Posted on 12/29/2021 5:14:09 PM PST by SeekAndFind
It took about 4 days for David Boulware, MD, MPH, to write the FDA emergency use authorization (EUA) application for fluvoxamine.
Yes, a doctor wrote an EUA application -- a task that has typically been relegated to pharmaceutical companies -- and yes, it was for a generic drug that physicians could technically prescribe off-label.
But Boulware, of the University of Minnesota, who is involved in a trial that's investigating fluvoxamine and other repurposed drugs -- along with a handful of other doctors and researchers -- took it upon themselves to apply because they believe the data substantiate its use in COVID-19.
"The big thing is, the data [are] available," Boulware said in an interview, referring to two published randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. "There should be enough data that the FDA would approve this under the normal review process to add a new indication for the drug."
He added that doctors may be "reluctant" to prescribe a drug off-label, or that "some health systems may have policies against it."
"I think most providers would feel more comfortable doing it if that therapy were FDA approved for that indication," said Carolyn Bramante, MD, MPH, also of the University of Minnesota.
Boulware said two randomized controlled trials support the use of fluvoxamine in preventing disease progression. In November 2020, the STOP-COVID study, led by Eric Lenze, MD, of Washington University in St. Louis, was published as a preliminary communication in JAMA. It showed that none of the 80 outpatients in the fluvoxamine group had clinical deterioration, compared with 6 of the 72 outpatients in the control group.
The TOGETHER trial, led by Brazilian researchers, included 1,497 COVID-19 positive outpatients with a risk factor for severe disease. Overall, those who took fluvoxamine spent less time in the emergency room and were less likely to transfer to the hospital than those who got placebo (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.88).
Boulware also mentioned a study -- though not a randomized controlled trial -- by David Seftel, MD, a doctor and CEO of Enable Biosciences, an antibody diagnostics company. Seftel conducted his own experiment, offering fluvoxamine to patients exposed to COVID-19 at a racetrack, and comparing those who accepted it with those who did not. None of those who took the drug were hospitalized, while 12.5% of those who refused the drug were, they reported in Open Forum Infectious Diseases.
Boulware was interested by the early data and helped Seftel write up the racetrack study, but he knew more data were needed. So he launched the COVID-OUT trial, with plans to enroll 1,160 COVID-19 outpatients. In addition to fluvoxamine, it will also test metformin and ivermectin for the early treatment of COVID-19.
The NIH also included a fluvoxamine arm in its ACTIV-6 study, Boulware said.
One of the main benefits of fluvoxamine is its decades-long safety track record. It's also easy and relatively inexpensive to manufacture, the researchers said.
Newer drugs like Pfizer and Merck's antivirals, meanwhile, are only available in limited supply. In Minnesota, Boulware said, only 880 treatment courses of molnupiravir have been distributed so far. And molnupiravir had a similarly modest effect on hospitalization and death.
Like the antivirals, fluvoxamine's effects won't be variant-dependent, unlike some of the monoclonal antibodies that have been rendered useless in the face of Omicron.
While the mechanism behind fluvoxamine's effects in COVID-19 isn't clear, one perspective published in Frontiers in Pharmacology posits that its sigma-1 receptor agonism has an anti-inflammatory effects. It also may reduce platelet activation, or increase melatonin, or act in other ways to help alleviate the "cytokine storm" brought on by COVID-19.
Also, Boulware said, fluvoxamine "is anti-inflammatory, but it's not necessarily [an] immunosuppressant," compared to using steroids to treat COVID-19, which he calls "kind of a big sledgehammer of an anti-inflammatory."
To be sure, the results of the TOGETHER trial aren't spectacular, Boulware said.
"It's a modest benefit, but 30% reduction in ER visits and hospitalization is a pretty good reduction if you think about it on a population scale, particularly if you have no alternative therapies," he said.
The problem, Boulware said, is that fluvoxamine "is a generic medicine and so there's no big pharmaceutical company that's going to take the effort and the time to apply [for an EUA] because it's made by six different companies or so in the U.S., and it's an inexpensive, $5-to-$10-treatment-course, kind of medicine."
So Boulware decided to file the application himself. He spent about 4 days compiling the data, explaining why there were few alternatives to the drug, and illustrating that the benefits outweighed potential risks of taking an antidepressant.
He said prior experience writing investigational new drug (IND) applications proved helpful, and he followed the agency's EUA submission guidance to a tee. He also had colleagues proofread the application.
Boulware noted that a company has expressed interest in supporting fluvoxamine, Boulware said. This company, which he said asked not to be named, provided the manufacturing information for the EUA application. It might also be first in line to make the drug should the EUA come through.
Other caveats, Boulware said, are the lack of clarity on proper dosage of the drug. A number of study participants in the TOGETHER trial couldn't tolerate the dose of 100 mg twice a day, quitting before the treatment was done. Nausea, sexual dysfunction, excess alertness, and sleep changes are among the side effects that might stop someone from taking the fluvoxamine. Researchers still need to pin down an appropriate dose, which will likely fall somewhere in between 100 mg twice a day and 50 mg twice a day -- the dose used in the racetrack study and in COVID-OUT.
There's also a stigma around taking antidepressants and similar drugs. "It's been brought to my attention that people may refuse it because it's an antidepressant, so that is unfortunate -- the concern that it might cause changes in psyche," said Bramante.
Still, "most people who are eligible would not have a bad effect from it," she noted.
Boulware and Bramante said SSRIs take weeks to affect mood, and would be highly unlikely to have a noticeable effect in just 10 days of treatment.
Boulware says he doesn't know when he'll hear back from the FDA about the EUA, but he said he received an emailed response from the agency confirming his submission.
His best guess is that he'll have a response in a matter of weeks: "There will be more trials coming, and so [the COVID-OUT] trial will be done in a month from now," he said. "And so if they say no, we need more data, we'll just reapply a month from now."
Florida is way ahead of this.
See here:
https://www.brudirect.com/news.php?id=134985
Dr. Joseph Ladapo, Florida surgeon general and secretary of the Florida Department of Health, issued a statewide public service announcement supporting commonsense Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) prevention strategies, including optimizing vitamin D levels, staying active, eating nutrient-dense food and boosting the immune system with supplements.
Florida’s Health Department also highlighted emerging treatments for COVID, such as fluvoxamine and inhaled budesonide. Fluvoxamine is an antidepressant pill, while inhaled budesonide is commonly used for asthma patients.
The department stated that physicians should now use their clinical judgment when recommending treatment options for patients’ health care needs, and may include emerging treatment options so long as there is appropriate informed consent of patients.
The evidence of vitamin D against COVID satisfies the criteria for causality in a biological system, with dozens of studies having been demonstrated that it helps reduce all risks associated with the disease.
The HealthierYouFL.org website has been urging Floridians to talk to their health care providers about how certain supplements or foods containing vitamins and minerals might help boost the immune system. These vitamins and minerals include zinc, vitamin D, vitamin C and quercetin, which are all known to have shown a positive impact on mitigating COVID-19 risks.
Vitamin D important for immune function
As early as September 2020, data from 14 observational studies showed that vitamin D blood levels are inversely correlated with the incidence or severity of COVID.
The body is well-equipped to handle infections, provided the immune system is working properly. Vitamin D receptors are found in large numbers of different tissues and cells, including immune cells. Meaning, vitamin D plays an important role in immune function.
Why couldn’t an enterprising Doctor do the same for Ivermectin?
Explain to me if there is an approved treatment why do we need a EUA?
Will never get it. Pfizer won’t allow it.
RE: Explain to me if there is an approved treatment why do we need a EUA?
Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin and Fluvoxamine are all APPROVED drugs by the FDA.... BUT NOT FOR COVID.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an acute respiratory disease caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Despite the second vaccination for SARS-CoV-2, the number of individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 variants (i.e., delta and lambda) has markedly increased worldwide. Although approximately 80% of individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 is mild to moderate, a part of them may convert to severe clinical stages in about 1 week, ultimately resulting in the intubation or death. Using drug repurposing, it is, therefore, necessary to discover drugs that can prevent clinical deterioration [1]. Here, we discuss the emergent use of the old antidepressant fluvoxamine which may block clinical deterioration in mild to moderate patients infected with SARS-CoV-2.
In November 2020, Dr. Lenze and his colleagues reported that fluvoxamine could prevent clinical deterioration in adult outpatients infected with SARS-CoV-2. In the study, clinical deterioration occurred in 0 of the fluvoxamine group (n = 80) and in 6 of placebo group (n = 72) [2]. Although sample size of this study was small, this study strongly encouraged further trials using a large sample size. In February 2021, Dr. Seftel and his colleague reported a prospective, non-randomized observational cohort study of fluvoxamine in outpatients (n = 113) infected with SARS-CoV-2 at the Golden Gate Fields horse racing track in Berkeley, California [3]. Incidence of hospitalization was 0 of the fluvoxamine-treated group (n = 65) and 6 of the observation alone group (n = 48). Two patients required intensive care unit stay with mechanical ventilation, one of them died. On April 23, 2021, fluvoxamine was added in the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) COVID-19 Guidelines Panel although there is insufficient evidence for the efficacy of fluvoxamine.
On August 6, 2021, the interim results of TOGETHER trial ( SEE HERE ) by a multinational group in Canada and Brazil were presented at the NIH symposium. They compared three compounds, fluvoxamine, the antidiabetic drug metformin, and the antiparasitic drug ivermectin. Although metformin and ivermectin did not show beneficial effects, fluvoxamine was much more promising. Among the randomized participants (n = 1,480), fluvoxamine significantly reduced the risk of disease progression by 29% (95% confidence interval 0.54–0.93) [4].
Detailed mechanisms of action of fluvoxamine for COVID-19 are currently unknown. In 1996, we reported that fluvoxamine binds to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) protein sigma-1 receptor with high affinity, suggesting a role of sigma-1 receptor in the mechanisms of its action [5]. Subsequent studies suggest that fluvoxamine is a potent agonist at sigma-1 receptor which plays a key role in inflammation [1, 5, 6]. Among the antidepressants, fluvoxamine was the most potent at sigma-1 receptor [1, 5, 6]. Furthermore, fluvoxamine has several beneficial effects, including reduction in platelet aggregation by serotonin transporter inhibition, decreased mast cell degranulation, interference with lysosomal trafficking of virus, inhibition of acid sphingomyelinase (ASM), and increased levels of metatonin by cytochrome P450 inhibition [7].
In October 2020, Gordon et al. [8] identified the sigma-1 receptor (encoded by SIGMAR1) as a functional host-dependency factor for SARS-CoV-2. Knockout or knockdown of SIGMAR1 produced robust reductions in SARS-CoV-2 replication, indicating a key role of the sigma-1 receptor in SARS-CoV-2 replication (Fig. 1). In 2019, Rosen et al. [9] demonstrated that the sigma-1 receptor is essential for the cytokine production in a mouse model of septic shock, and that fluvoxamine could protect against inflammatory response and lethal septic shock. Taken together, it is likely that the potent sigma-1 receptor agonists, such as fluvoxamine, might ameliorate inflammatory events (i.e., cytokine storm) associated with ER stress due to SARS-CoV-2 replication.
Fig. 1
A recent observational multicenter study (n = 2846) showed association between the use of functional inhibitors of ASM and reduced risk of intubation or death in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 [10]. The functional inhibitors of ASM include the antidepressants such as fluvoxamine, fluoxetine, and escitalopram. Interestingly, fluoxetine and escitalopram are also sigma-1 receptor agonists although they are less potent than fluvoxamine [1]. Considering the role of sigma-1 receptor and ASM in biological actions of SARS-CoV-2 in cells (Fig. 1), both fluoxetine and escitalopram may be prophylactic drugs for mild to moderate patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 although further clinical study is needed.
The advantages of fluvoxamine are favorable safety profiles, widespread availability, very low cost, oral administration and use for children and adolescents. If fluvoxamine is used in individuals with COVID-19 as quickly as possible after confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection, clinical deterioration might be prevented [1]. Importantly, fluvoxamine could be a prophylactic drug for COVID-19 in countries with low vaccination rates or low health system.
The authors did the reference search and wrote the commentary.
Dr. Y. Hashimoto and Dr. Suzuki have no conflict of interest. Dr. K. Hashimoto has received speakers’ honoraria from Abbott and Meiji Seika.
In the case of ivermectin, I think doctors are actually forbidden from writing it for Covid. They used to be able to do it as an off-label use, and they can still do that with these other drugs. But Biden and Fauci will probably close those off too.
They want to crush us all.
Ping for your interest
Steve Kirsch (rich vaccine resister) tried this. He put up the money for initial studies but his application was rejected without review because he could not find a pharm manufacture to join the application.
So even though IVM has been safely manufactured at-scale for years, the FDA declined to accept the application let alone review it.
RE: his application was rejected without review because he could not find a pharm manufacture to join the application.
Why do you need a pharm manufacturer to join the application? I’m not sure I understand the logic behind this.
Bkmk
FDA wants to review the manufacturing process too. This makes sense for a new drug that is being authorized. But it doesn't make sense for a repurposed drug.
In the posted article it mentions the applicants for Fluvoxamine EUA did have manufacturer lined up as part of the application.
It is not a sensible requirement for re-purposed drugs that are available at-scale and more or less off-the-shelf.
Well it does makes sense if the FDA is trying to protect a critical source of funding (Big Pharma). Also, important if you are an FDA executive/researcher that wants to graduate to private industry.
Note, the FDA is partially (46%) funded by user-fees. Pharma companies pay a lot of fees ($2.8 billion) to the FDA to process/review applications. Link: www.fda.gov/about-fda/fda-basics/fact-sheet-fda-glance
I googled it. One page said it’s obsolete and used for compulsive disorders. Wth?
These suggestions for a healthier lifestyle from the Florida surgeon general should’ve been coming from the federal government from day one of Covid. Instead they closed the playgrounds and parks and said stay inside, wear a mask and order your food to be delivered.
It isn’t that hard to get the ivermectin protocol these days.
Pushealth and the Front Line Doctors site will get you in touch with a doc that will help.
If this passes, look for Blackrock, Vanguard, or one of the drug companies to snatch up the company/companies making the stuff and exponentially raising the price.
It’s the hospitals and doctor groups that are bought and paid for that won’t give that stuff to patients. No money in it.
There are numerous stories of folks on their death beds, family wants to try Ivermectin, hospital denies, family sues, patient gets ivermectin and leaves the hospital and is fine. $3 worth of drugs. Or $1000s in hospital charges.
That is true, I’ve used them myself, but that is not the point.
The point is we need a way to overcome the “official” propaganda that Ivermectin does not work and is dangerous so we can do two things:
1. Save more lives.
2. Get rid of the EUAs shielding Big-Pharma from lawsuits.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.