[_Jim]

re: " “But Brazilians quickly discovered — through heart-wrenching personal experience — the limits of treating COVID-19 with ivermectin. Brazil suffered some of its worst death rates yet in late 2020 and early 2021, even in heavily ivermectin-dosed areas, as the more transmissible P1, or Gamma, variant spread quickly across the country.” "

NO CONTROL for co-morbidities, or age, or WHEN IVM was administered, nor if any vitamin regimens where administered too ... in short business insider lies by omission.

[DugwayDuke]

im wrote: “NO CONTROL for co-morbidities, or age, or WHEN IVM was administered, nor if any vitamin regimens where administered too ... in short business insider lies by omission.”

My first impression of this ‘study’ was that it read like a commercial for ivermectin. Then I saw this: “The evidence base for that protocol leaned heavily on data from Dr. Flávio Cadegiani, who’s now a member of the FLCCC, a US-based ivermectin propaganda machine.”

I find it amusing that those who constantly criticize ‘big pharma’ for profiting evidently have no issue with the profits made by those pushing these ‘alternative therapies’. Criticizing doctors and ‘big pharma’ for profiting from vaccines is as old as the hills. It’s one of the favorite arguments of those pushing these ‘alternative therapies’.