im wrote: “NO CONTROL for co-morbidities, or age, or WHEN IVM was administered, nor if any vitamin regimens where administered too ... in short business insider lies by omission.”
My first impression of this ‘study’ was that it read like a commercial for ivermectin. Then I saw this: “The evidence base for that protocol leaned heavily on data from Dr. Flávio Cadegiani, who’s now a member of the FLCCC, a US-based ivermectin propaganda machine.”
I find it amusing that those who constantly criticize ‘big pharma’ for profiting evidently have no issue with the profits made by those pushing these ‘alternative therapies’. Criticizing doctors and ‘big pharma’ for profiting from vaccines is as old as the hills. It’s one of the favorite arguments of those pushing these ‘alternative therapies’.
re: “ It’s one of the favorite arguments of those pushing these ‘alternative therapies’.”
What is the primary treatment for Covid-19?
Remdesivir?
Really?
Is that your ‘claim’?
You’re looking more and more disingenuous by the day ...
You bunch of disingenuous SOBs -
“Pfizer CEO Says Fourth Covid-19 Vaccine Booster Will be Required Sooner Than Expected”
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4021192/posts
ITS NEVER GOING TO END, YOU MORONS!!!! WITH YOUR APPROACH!!
These viruses are going to be with us FOREVER!!!
MAYBE, just MAYBE you need a basic, introductory EDUCATION in viruses ... THIS VIDEO will give you SOME idea of how prevalent VIRUSES ARE throughout the WORLD and in every living CREATURE:
“Are Viruses Alive?” And how prevalent are they - with Carl Zimmer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tryg5UCp6fI