[stylin19a]

not a pile on. You answered the question in Post 2181 ? not even.

I wasn't referring to photos. I was asking why your post 1915 comment was ok, but C.D.Y. had to take his post 1930 comment to your post 1915 to PM?
so no you didn't answer the question - you can't get around your post 1915.

Follow carefully

You responded to post 1886 with your post 1915.
Cletus respond to 1915 with 1930
You responded to 1930 with 1934
I responded to 1934 with 1955

Your hypocrisy in post 1934 - my post 1955 and I pinged C.D.Y

your thread postings are great - we all muck things up every now and again... Just admit you screwed up and be done with it.

your use of the troll word to CYA or disagree is starting to get boring.

Yes, your armpits do stink.
FRegards.

[grey_whiskers]

OK, wait a sec.

I didn't look up the post you were asking me about, I jumped to conclusions.

About half this time, I thought people were responding to the pic of Michael Flynn and Barky photoshopped into St. Michael and the Devil picture.

As Google Maps says, "recalibrating"...

My Post 2015 said "Only if you accept Sola Scriptura which is a late-arriving Protestant doctrine."

That was in reply to Post 1886 which said

"What makes you think this trolling? Seemed like a reasonable question to me."

Now Post 1886 also quoted in italics, my Post 1769

(and 1769 itself only *part of Post 1743

"Yes, of course, but where in scripture does it teach to honor the angels by feasts or praying? It would be helpful to back this up with scripture. Thanks."

For *that* controversy, the difference is that the one poster is accepting as a GIVEN, Sola Scriptura, which is not accepted by everyone.

My response was not "You'd better do it my way or else"; but a reminder that not everyone in Christendom (either geographically or temporally) necessarily agreed.

Point taken.