Posted on 07/21/2021 7:45:08 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
Description from site:
"I was an F-16 pilot for 18 years and now use those skills analyzing Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon. This video analyzes the three videos released by Jeremy Corbell - radar feed, thermal video, and optical video. Combined they make an amazing case that these are indeed objects that we currently can't explain or understand."
At least we have some of the answers as to what the UFO’s are and how they are monitoring us.
This is the best analysis I have seen so far of these UAP sensor recordings by a professional who knows how to interpret what has been recorded.
If you went and asked the NASA guys for a rule-book on how we’d leave this solar system and explore new worlds with potential beings...we’d also be silent, hide, and only observe.
Lol and I saw Luke Skywalket blow up the Death Star.
I think he was trying to insert a little humor there.;-)
They are basically interstellar Peeping Toms.
"I'm having space alien tonight."
Everything seen and captured from the displays was computer generated. Much of the systems are integrated meaning, a software glitch on one would be transferred to other devices in the network
All of this raises two questions in my mind.
1) Why would somebody in the Navy fake these “sightings”?
and
2) Why wouldn’t somebody in the Navy fake these “sightings”?
These videos have been confirmed by the Pentagon. So the DOD would have to be in on the fake.
Take it from me... what you seen in that video is simply an optical phenomenon in the camera system used.
Believe me or not, but I do know what I’m talking about more than 99.99% of the “scientists” (aka grant-whores) out there. I have personally hand-made and machine-made thousands of telescope optical systems for one of the largest telescope manufacturers in the world, as well as in my own shop. During that process I have scrutinized the minutiae of optical weirdness that happens when things are under high magnification, and I guarantee you what you see in that video is something out of focus and off axis just enough to be coming in and out of the optical path.
Exactly.
Ball lighting would not make q splash.
THANK YOU for bringing real knowledge and insight to this thread.
BTW, the specific video I’m talking about is the one at 25 seconds into that much longer video. I didn’t bother to watch the rest of it.
https://youtu.be/hUx6gHw3McM?t=25
You want a real world example of something like this?
Hold your right thumb up straight out in front of you at arms length and close your left eye. Look at your thumb. Without changing the direction that you are looking, slowly move your arm/thumb to the right. When you move your thumb about 6-8 inches it disappears, and then reappears when you move it a little farther. That’s more of a biological phenomenon than an optical one, but it’s a simple example of how the specific complexities in a given system do things like that.
Have you ever wondered why UFO and Sasquatch videos are blurry? Yeah, neither have I.
BFL
Yeah, well, if I kill myself trying to work out this “ thumb and left eye closed” thing while running the brush hog, it’s your fault.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.