AZ GOP Chairwoman Kelli Ward Exposes The Big Lie Behind Maricopa County Refusing to Permit Review of Router System During Ballot Audit

Conservative Treehouse ^ | 10 May, 2021 | sundance

[MtnClimber]

Arizona GOP Chairwoman Kelli Ward provided an update this morning about the Maricopa County audit.

The Maricopa board of supervisors previously denied the auditors access to the full electronic trail of ballot counting. The board held a closed-door emergency hearing and then stated allowing the auditors to review the rounter system, and/or providing passwords for the router network, would compromise sensitive law enforcement data. Kelli Ward debunks that claim by outlining that none of the electronic networks used in elections are connected to any other governmental agency or office.

There are no other networks or servers connected to the voting system. The boards justification is a fraud. The auditors are demanding a review of the electronic router system used in the ballot tabulation process. The auditors and State Senate are likely to battle Maricopa county in court.

[nagant]

**If they are on a separate VLAN and Subnet more would have to be configured to isolate them from other networks in Maricopa County...**

Maricopa’s governing democrats stated that the reason they are refusing to turn over voting system servers is that the servers also serve other systems with more sensitive data. Wouldn’t that be an indictment in itself? Shouldn’t a voting system stand separate where votes can’t be changed via access through other systems?

[polymuser]

Funny that in Michigan, per their contract with Dominion (see link below, page 127), there was to be one eDevice CellGo (cellular 3G internet modem dongle, link below) per precinct.

Look, Katie! They’re connected to the internet by a little thingy tucked inside a voting device.

How about in AZ?

https://www.michigan.gov/documents/sos/071B7700117_Dominion_555356_7.pdf

https://www.edevice.com/products/cellgo

[SGCOS]

Yup. And you only need one machine with a hidden wireless router to connect to all voting machines, which were ‘isolated’

[Mr. K]

"Not only do you block the inquiry, you enlist the help of powerful people and the media to stall it even further"

AND lied about routers revealing 'law enforcement data' when they were never connected to law enforcement networks

[I am Richard Brandon]

"Start tossing them in jail for contempt of court

Do it! Do it! Do it!

[AndyJackson]

Having witnesses to parallels samples which are sent to an independent lab for verification just in case someone decides to cook the books.

[rlmorel]

I have long assumed they are on a separate network but I don't know for sure, just speculating. Obviously, having it on a completely isolated network would be MOST secure, but that would be impractical on a County-wide system, particularly one that decides to use the Optional Modem Transmission. (Looking at this diagram below we see the "Optional Modem Transmission" as an alternative to the secure USB option which would be used to carry the ballot images to the Democracy Suite system.)

I also make the presumption that if there is network connectivity outbound to send ballot images instead of sneaker-netting them to the appropriate ingestion point, then there is also the possibility of a network connection back in order to...ahem...remotely configure the Imagecast Precinct, Evolution, BMD, and XSystem voting machines from the Democracy suite EMS Election Programming Station. (And just as likely, the Imagecast Central optical scanners).

All of which obviously would open up a lot of cans of worms.

Think of the Antrim County (Michigan) machines that had, on average, a 68% failure rate scanning in documents...that is AVERAGE across the county, and one precinct in particular had an 81% error rate scanning and ingesting ballots. The log files had been removed (this is my surprised face) but someone, in their inept sabotage, did not realize there were stored logs in a different location they neglected to delete and that is where they got the error rates from.

Again...from the connections possible from the EMS Election Programming stations or other entry points in the Dominion Democracy Suite systems? Don't know.

But I do know one thing: when I have to look at systems forensically in my line of work, and specific logs are missing that should be there...that I am USED to seeing there, that SCREAMS malfeasance to me. When you see that, someone is attempting to cover their tracks. Of course, you could always turn off logging in some systems (and I have seen it done deliberately if large log files were being generated) and forget to turn it back on, but...when I am in the American Southwest instead of the African Subcontinent and hear hooves, I think Horses, not Zebras.

This whole business stinks to high heaven.

[rlmorel]

It stinks.

And with each passing day, it makes me angrier and angrier. Where are the people out there (besides those like Kelli Ward) who would publicly point out this rubbish?

Where are they? Are they that cowed professionally that they won’t say how, on the surface, these claims are absurd?

[Dr. Franklin]

They are deathly afraid that the IP addresses from the routers will correspond to the IP addresses witnessed by others, like Mike Lindell’s NSA type expert on the election having been hacked by China.

[gr8eman]

Just send the Sheriff and a computer geek to retrieve it! The “state” owns the equipment. It’s their property!

[Billie Bud]

So in keeping with IP addresses, what happens to IP
Addresses in a system like Musk’s Starlink? Anyone know? Will there be any ? Or does Everythjng basically stay the same? I’m sorry if this is a dumb question, but I’m with the big anti-gas car independence push by the left, I’m suspicious of him.

[MtnClimber]

I agree. So where are the cries of COLLUSION! CHINA, CHINA, CHINA!!! which actually did happen!

[Lockbox]

All the election officials who used those machine claim they were not hook to the internet. Then why not let the Auditors confirm that detail?

[Dr. Franklin]

All the election officials who used those machine claim they were not hook to the internet. Then why not let the Auditors confirm that detail?

More to the point, if Maricopa County officials didn't have access to the admin account for the election, how could they know that it wasn't? They lacked the competence to know. Ergo, they were at best completely incompetent, and at worst complicit in the fraud. The pattern of obstruction suggests the latter.

[Chewbarkah]

“Kelli Ward debunks that claim by outlining that none of the electronic networks used in elections are connected to any other governmental agency or office.”

To frame that as a question: Hey, BoS, were the Maricopa election networks illegally interconnected with other networks, or are you lying?

Answer: “Both”. The BoS is desperate not to let auditors see the networks and routers, precisely because the election network was most definitely connected to other electronic networks. Thank you, idiots, for giving that away with your claim about endangering LEOs.

Thought 2: Is Kelli Ward signaling that the election networks were connected to something other than a “GOVERNMENTAL agency or office”?

[Deplorable American1776]

I’m hoping Kelli Ward found something...

[lepton]

There’s not a good reason for the routers and switches to be on the county administrative network, except perhaps in the broadest sense of ‘network’, such as including the internet. And yes, real routers and switches would be needed in order to run a large network, and they would be dedicated.

OTOH, you’d expect a lot of the routing data to be lost when they are turned off, unless they route-mapped everything.

[lepton]

They seem to be claiming that they can’t turn over the routers because it would reveal they are violating other laws.

[lepton]

They are deathly afraid that the IP addresses from the routers will correspond to the IP addresses witnessed by others, like Mike Lindell’s NSA type expert on the election having been hacked by China.

---

Or just IP addresses that are not associated with specifically appropriate ones.

[dartuser]

By the time they get the router the evidence will be destroyed ...