Posted on 01/16/2021 8:14:38 AM PST by Jan_Sobieski
“But wait! something’s coming up that will be Big ...tomorrow”
Canned Raviolis for lunch? Oh goody!
‘RadicalTrump supporters’
Omg. Plz stop watching the msm
Some Q sites were shut down tho
But they never doxxed "Q", never shut it down entirely. They had to make it look good. That's what made it work.
The Q phenomenon is no help to Trump or those who seek to clean the swamp. It kept them pacified while four years of coup efforts unfolded. It being an intelligence trick by part of our deep state and/or China has long been a likely possibility.
At best all it could do is delay things. Bullets do not have a shelf life. And Americans do not rush to use bullets to solve political problems.
Also a Q clearance is a Top Secret level compartment issued by the Department of Energy as defined in the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and covers nuclear weapons and related materials.
Has nothing to do with the FR Q topics we saw posted.
This is probably where the original Q-ster got the idea to claim a Q clearance.
“..... “Q” Clearance was a 1986 novel by Peter Benchley (Random House, ISBN 0-394-55360-8), satirizing Cold War secrecy and politics. ....”
Again BS.
Golitsyn and Q, AND OTHERS all deal with material covering propaganda, disinformation, false flags, psyops.
Saying Golitsyn spawned Q is like saying Karl F. Kuhn was copied by Halliday-Resnick-Walker because both produced textbooks covering physics.
Q is not Anon. The mashing of Q and Anon is a leftist media ploy to discredit Q. Q is an AI probalistic prediction program developed by a kernel within military intel.
People that try and stretch Q to this and that don’t know WTF they are talking about. They fall into the Alex Jones ahole category.
Here are a couple: We did not actively protest the lockdowns early enough to protect our economies and many lives. We did not engage in enough voter objection to the universal mail-in ballots or enough observation during the election. Others anyone? As someone else said earlier, we did not communicate or protest enough to the President about the swamp creatures he hired in good faith.
The Soviets created “Trust Operation”. Golitsyn merely wrote about it
I know. I’ve been saying Q Anon is a psy op for years.
It ended up damaging us, as planned.
From the little that I saw posted it sounded kinda “Hopey-Changey” to me.
This historical analogy is BULLSH!T
The Soviets created this psyop WHILE they were in power.
The Dems were NOT in power during Q.
Trump could’ve ended the whole Q movement with one tweet. IHMO he didn’t because it was seen as a harmless prank, but who knows?
Barr took flack from both sides but Ended the Mueller probe BS. Could he have done more? Probably, but he had to deal with the turncoats in the DOJ and a politicized Court system. (Hack "judge" Sullivan....(Here I figuratively spit on the ground.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYJGgr-ufLk&feature=youtu.be
Make what you want of it. If you don't like what the General says should take their complaints to him. At this point there are 25,000 NG troops in DC and they are apparently stopping people for ID at check points. I think at this point the only thing to do is watch this play out, anything else is just a waste of pixels.
When I see tortilla chips I always look for some salsa.
Military intel adopted many successful Soviet disinfo techniques and improved them. Two can play that game but our military intel plays it better.
The Marxist democrats and their enemy propaganda carriers are trying to destroy Q because Q wakes and unifies Americans which is the biggest threat to the left.
Take your Soviet Q mashup to Alex Jones and tell him I said to stick it up his fat a$$.
Don’t count it out. Some things are coming to past this weekend.
You assume you know Trump’s motivations and thoughts.
Doubt it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.