To: grayboots
OSU played five less games. That’s a lot of wear and tare they didn’t incur like everyone else did.
2 posted on
01/02/2021 5:14:32 AM PST by
ealgeone
To: ealgeone
“ OSU played five less games. That’s a lot of wear and tare they didn’t incur like everyone else did.”
*************
OSU was obviously bigger, stronger, certainly more motivated than Clemson. The only team that can physically match up is Alabama. Should be a heck of a game; good old fashion smash mouth football...
7 posted on
01/02/2021 5:30:03 AM PST by
snoringbear
(,W,E.oGovernment is the Pimp, )
To: ealgeone
"OSU played five less games. That’s a lot of wear and tare they didn’t incur like everyone else did."
It's a double-edged sword -- there is less wear and tear, but there is also less practice time and player development.
61 posted on
01/02/2021 7:35:59 AM PST by
Hetuck
("We will Barry you" - Nikita Khrushchev)
To: ealgeone
OSU played five less games. That’s a lot of wear and tare they didn’t incur like everyone else did.
It’s some less wear and tear. It’s a whole lot of less experience and tightening things up.
105 posted on
01/02/2021 1:42:33 PM PST by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson