Posted on 06/18/2020 12:12:38 PM PDT by OrangeHoof
Next time you encounter a BLM member, ask them a very serious question:
The Prophet Muhammad owned slaves! In our culturally-sensitive times, shouldn't organizations like BLM be picketing mosques? Shouldn't they demand statues and buildings named for the Prophet Muhammad be removed or renamed?
Here's an excerpt from the BBC acknowledging this fact:
"The Prophet Muhammad did not try to abolish slavery, and bought, sold, captured, and owned slaves himself. But he insisted that slave owners treat their slaves well and stressed the virtue of freeing slaves."
and
"writers argue that by regulating slavery the Prophet gave his authority to its continued existence, and that by having slaves himself he showed his approval."
In fact, it was those "white devils" who gradually persuaded the Moslems to stop slave trading:
"The Arab slave trade was most active in West Asia, North Africa, and Southeast Africa. Muslim traders exported as many as 17 million slaves to the coast of the Indian Ocean, the Middle East, and North Africa.[12] In the early 20th century (post World War I), slavery was gradually outlawed and suppressed in Muslim lands, largely due to pressure exerted by Western nations such as Britain and France."
So let them explain why they aren't protesting at mosques and Islamic centers and watch their heads explode.
The Prophet wasn’t white, so it doesn’t matter.
It’a all about the gibs, and nothing else.
Lets demand that anyone who says the name Mohammed should lose their jobs or get beaten up for supporting slavery.
Well duh. The coreanne allows that doesn’t it?
And some of his modern descendants still do today.
I’ll see that and raise you an ‘anyone NAMED moo-ham-head gets beat up for supporting slavery.’
Tear down the Muhammad statues.
(It’s a trick answer....there are NO statues in Islam.)
From what little I have read of slavery in North Africa, they did not treat slaves at all well. In fact treated them with true brutality.
Had they not read the Koran?
Has anyone brought this to the attention of Louis Farrakhan?
QUESTION:
Why did the black Africans sell their brothers & sisters to slave traders?
Perhaps reparations should be sought from black Africans?
Sure Mo owned slaves. They were Jews and other infidels. Doesn’t count.
/S
And they still do!
IIRC the prophet (pee be upon him) was a red head.
Any bets all his black slaves were castrated?
Mudslimes also don’t allow statues of Mo’HamHead to exist, but I do like the idea of suing mosques for their part in slavery.
Slavery goes on all across North Africa and the Middle East. What rock have you been living under?
But he (Muhammad )insisted that slave owners treat their slaves well ..:
Yeah well so did many American slave owners. So this makes Muhammad a swell guy ?
Why did the black Africans sell their brothers & sisters to slave traders?
Because there were buyers in North and South America.
...and Middle East muzzoids where it’s still an ongoing slave trade.
As was the United States until 1859
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.