Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michigan Judge Sides with Barber, Rejects Gretchen Whitmer Demand to Close Shop
Breitbart ^ | 11 May 2020 | KYLE OLSON

Posted on 05/12/2020 10:28:25 AM PDT by Hojczyk

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: dp0622
As for me I am going for a speakeasy haircut right now :-)

Funny you'd use the term "speakeasy" ... GF and I went out to dinner last Friday night. That's right: OUT TO DINNER. It was her birthday.

A friend who lives on a golf course knows the owner of the restaurant on the course. The owner has been opening for club members and kept everything on the QT. He's been opening every night for table service for a few weeks now so my friend went over to the restaurant on the course with us so the owner knew we were ok to come in (ie: not report him.)

We had a WONDERFUL dinner. We've so missed dining out. As we talked while waiting for dinner I said it had to be a similar experience to a speakeasy back during the prohibition days.

What a great night. Since I do the bulk of the cooking in our relationship it was nice to have someone else make the meal and clean-up the dishes for a change!

41 posted on 05/12/2020 1:42:16 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

The Barber was just on Howie Carr - he said the Governor is coming back at him with other charges


42 posted on 05/12/2020 1:49:52 PM PDT by EC Washington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

it sounds like it was a great time and I’m glad you to get a night out in this crazy time!


43 posted on 05/12/2020 1:50:36 PM PDT by dp0622 (Radicals, racists dont point fingers at me I'm a small town white boy Just tryin to make ends meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Rightwing Conspiratr1

The haircut black market can be found, if you have eyes to see it. Don’t ask me how I know this...


44 posted on 05/12/2020 2:00:18 PM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

mochigan needs a nuke.

most states will need a nuke.


45 posted on 05/12/2020 2:22:33 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: glennaro
Where the Constitution has not been suspended outright (e.g., California, Michigan, et al.) it most certainly has been compromised (i.e., threatened) in many other states by the actions of the governors.

From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_constitutional_law what looks to me like the basis of the democrats 'compromise'. They corrupt US with their changes then compromise US out of Liberty

United States constitutional law defines the scope and application of the terms of the Constitution, although not lawfully. The states created the US Constitution, and it is not for interpretation as it means exactly today what it meant when the document was created.

[“On every occasion [of Constitutional interpretation] let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying [to force] what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, [instead let us] conform to the probable one in which it was passed.” Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Johnson, 12 June 1823]

The US Constitution covers areas of law such as the relationship between the federal government and state governments, requires the rights of individuals be protected by those who serve within our governments - state and federal, and other fundamental aspects of the application of government authority in the United States.

It is a field of law that is by some considered broad and complex, although defined in writing for anyone to read and learn to understand by referring to the writings of those involved in the creation of the US Constitution. Some constitutional scholars maintain that the authors of the Constitution intended that it be vague and subject to interpretation so that it could be adapted to the needs of a changing society, and try to use the excuse that today is more complex so the US Constitution needs to be re-interpreted.

Others maintain that the provisions of the Constitution should be strictly construed and their provisions applied in a very literal manner as put into writing by those who created it so that all could understand the supreme Law of this nation.[2]

I broke the information into paragraphs.

46 posted on 05/12/2020 3:40:29 PM PDT by MurrietaMadman (when I want an intoxicant powerful enough to deceive a nation I ask for corona)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson