Posted on 04/15/2020 10:50:24 AM PDT by ransomnote
(Translated: I saw her before bags!)
I'm sure they believe it. I'm sure it makes them dangerous because they feel entitled to kill many to achieve their godlike desires.
Cletus D. Yokel And mankind said, “Let us make god in our image. It went downhill from there. Damn straight it did.
outinyellowdogcountry I had been taught that Genesis 6:1-4 referred to fallen angels uniting with humans. However, I have learned more fully and believe that not to be true.
Mon.,Wed., and Fri. I go with fallen angels. Tues., Thurs. and Sat. I go with the line of Adam. Either way it was cleaned up by the flood. Compelling arguments can be made that God sent the flood to wipe out the genetic corruption from the Nephilim. Compelling but not conclusive, I'm leaning toward fallen angels myself.
Walt StuartI think that depends on which of his assertions we are talking about. No mortal is 100% accurate. Few are 100% wrong or off the wall.
I'm talking about his assertion that God is part of some kind of council of elohim that are conferring with one another in the beginning of Genisis. To me that seemed to be the major thrust of his argument. (The part about the illuminati being Nephilim is rather late in the argument.) That is badly wrong and dangerous for people who don't have a full and proper grounding in the theology of God and the Trinity. Satan's first lie was about God's benevolence. "You will not surely die, but God does know that in the day you eat thereof you will be AS God (not like God but AS God...taking his place) knowing good from evil.
Most people miss that right there in Genesis it tells you what sin really is. She took the fruit and SAW THAT IT WAS GOOD. for food, pleasant to behold and much to be desired to make one wise. Go back and read Genesis chapter one. God saw that it was good. God saw that it was good. God saw that it was very good. over and over. Who declares the standard of good and evil? God or man? Sin is standing in god's place and declaring good that which God has declared evil. It is a usurpation of God's prerogative as God. Did God tell them the fruit would be good for them or bad for them if they ate it? God said bad, they decided good based on the lie that God was withholding something good from them by withholding the fruit. The reality is that humans are not capable of discerning good from evil in much other than the simplest of things because we cannot see all of the consequences of our actions down through time. Therefore God has revealed to us in His word how we should live in order to enjoy the maximum amount of blessing, or happiness.
Think about homosexuality. God declared it an abomination humans have declared it to be good. Abortion? Lust? Adultery? the list goes on. My point is that it starts with a wrong conception of God that then encourages us to question His character which leads to a rejection of His word which then gives us license to justify our own wicked desires. This process could be exacerbated by the idea that God is just one of a committee of Elohim, why should I listen to him?
And, that's a point where I believe the "Book of Enoch" as we have it is flawed, wrong.
This is why the book of Enoch is merely psuedepigraphal. It was not considered to be scripture when the Bible was canonized. Its date is between the 2nd and the 1st century B.C. Enoch as you well know lived in the days of Noah, so the reliability of any oral tradition is suspect as well as is the assertion that the sayings were even those of the Biblical Enoch in the first place. I don't accept it. You need strong evidence to go against the accepted canon. Enoch is not even included in the apocryphal books, but is an psuedepigraphal book (Greek for false writings)
Walt Stuart Now, THAT'S the part I'm thankful that NEON REVOLT has raised and discussed. Some folks can receive that from him who could not receive it from other sources.
I agree with you there, but it just really concerns me that those same people will believe this very wrong idea about God.
She is a sexy little number, aint' she.
#RassleYaForIt
I'd rather #RassleHer
#NoHomo
The only "real" error is the word "ere". "Ignore" follows a period in W.H.O. and most applications automatically capitalize after a period. Coronavirus, with the capital 'V' has been a common treatment of the word for some time. Now, about that "ere". Most see that as a misspelled 'are' but, in the context, that does not fit; 'are' is present tense. 'were', OTOH fits the context as POTUS is referring to the past actions of WHO. Within the sentence structure, the combo of 'did..make' makes the context past tense. So, we have a MISSING 'W'.
Zing!
#GotMe
CIA training must be great. Anderson Cooper can keep a straight face through anything.
Regarding this topic: Satan is a fallen angel.
You are correct.
We covered this topic in my Bible Study. Lucifer was the angel who wanted to be “above God” in every way. After he was cast out of heaven with his follower fallen angels, he was named Satan.
For anyone on this thread who is interested in reading the actual Scripture:
Ezekiel 28
Isaiah 14
Good explanation on Christianity.com “How did Lucifer fall and become Satan” is the title of the article.
Yep! Oh well!
Michael
Gabriel
Lucifer
OK...I lied, kinda, but not on purpose.
I can’t find all the issues I saw not less than 14 days ago. I also didn’t look in every box (xmas & t-giving & easter boxes) and some of those are mis-labeled.
I found the last issue of George under wraps. I found the Trump issue and I found the Bono issue.
My wife said she had the first issue under wraps which I can’t find, though I swear I saw it - some lady (Julia Roberts ?) in a George Washington looking outfit ?
and she seems to think it and others are packed away somewhere in her office.
I’ll keep diggin.
sorry...
It’s the story of my investment life. Buy a stock and watch it tank.
Hell, I had Uranium 1 at one time! I’m so embarrassed.
Michigan Sheriffs Reject Governor’s Excessive Lockdown OrderMichigan Sheriffs Reject Governor’s Excessive Lockdown Order 👇https://t.co/4xmOn8uEbQ— Dan Bongino (@dbongino) April 17, 2020
Earlier this week, we reported on Democrat Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer’s asinine lockdowns, which included prohibitions against buying anything she considers “non-essential,” banning motor-boating, entering any residence that one doesn’t own, driving to a second house one may own, or standing less than six feet apart against someone (which carries a $1,000 fine). We also reported that on Wednesday, hundreds of cars and trucks went to the state capitol in protest of the governor’s edicts.
Now, it looks like the protesters and anyone against Whitmer’s draconian measures have friends in law enforcement.
According to the Daily Wire, a statement released by four sheriffs from northern Michigan counties said that they will not be enforcing some of Whitmer’s orders, due to the governor’s edicts’ excessive overstep of her executive authority.
Absolutely. I’ve thought ever since Q said the first arrest will shock the world, that it would be 0bola.
Placemark to check the two twitter things.
Go Big or Go Home. It’s alright. We still love ya.
EVERYONE of the current Q drops have attached graphics that start with EV.
Each has a second V in it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
What is the significance?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.