Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Cats’: Film Review: Nine may not be enough lives for some of the stars to live down their involvement in this poorly conceived and executed adaptation of Andrew Lloyd Webber’s hit musical.
Variety ^ | December 18, 2019 | Peter DeBurge

Posted on 12/19/2019 6:21:35 AM PST by C19fan

Back in the summer of 2015, the co-directors of Disney’s “Zootopia” went rogue, disregarding the advice of their corporate colleagues and appearing onstage at the Annecy animation festival disguised as the talking-animal cartoon’s fur-covered lead characters, an anthropomorphic rabbit and her foxy best friend. The audience ate it up, but behind the scenes, the Disney suits were sweating. For decades, the family entertainment company had been dealing with a very specific group of enthusiasts, identified as “furries,” who get off on dressing up in full-body animal costumes, drawing inspiration wherever they can find it. By now, Disney lawyers know how to deal with that crowd, but other studios have to learn the hard way.

I mention this because it’s just one of dozens of things the folks at Universal seem not to have taken into consideration before making a movie version of Andrew Lloyd Webber’s long-running musical “Cats” — another being the need to define, for generations uninitiated, the meaning of “Jellicle,” a nonsense word repeated nearly six dozen times in the opening number alone. Fans of the original show may embrace it; so too will furries, I’d wager. But it’s not enough to take a blockbuster Broadway phenomenon with one iconic earworm — Lloyd Webber’s unforgettable “Memory” — and a loose plot about a community of street cats competing for a chance to be reborn, and trust it to work on the big screen.

(Excerpt) Read more at variety.com ...


TOPICS: Music/Entertainment; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: cats; costumes; furries; hollywood; legwarmers; musicals; weirdstuff
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: Rinnwald

Michael Bay?


41 posted on 12/19/2019 9:14:47 AM PST by Seruzawa (TANSTAAFL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Taylor Swift is in the movie. She owns 3 cats.... so far.


42 posted on 12/19/2019 10:38:30 AM PST by minnesota_bound (homeless guy. He just has more money....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa
Michael Bay?

Don't tempt me.

43 posted on 12/19/2019 12:38:36 PM PST by Rinnwald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

It’s at 19% on Rotten Tomatoes. Bet it will flop at the box office.


44 posted on 12/19/2019 2:18:53 PM PST by EdnaMode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

From the director who ruined Les Miserables.


45 posted on 12/19/2019 3:12:16 PM PST by gymbeau (I refuse to be anonymous. I am THEnonymous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Well “Cats” Bombed Big Time at the BO, gross on Friday at 3800 screens a whopping $2.2 Million. It’s huge failure and poor Taylor Swift goes down in Inglorious Flames, couldnot happen to more deserving person.


46 posted on 12/21/2019 2:55:49 PM PST by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson