Meghan Markle targeted by tabloids because she’s biracial: Hillary Clinton

1 posted on 10/13/2019 4:27:23 PM PDT by simpson96

Oh, good grief.

FReepers have been as hard on her as anyone on the internet, and I can’t recall anyone here making a fuss or even mentioning about her ethnicity

Being an entitled whore, yes.

2 posted on 10/13/2019 4:30:12 PM PDT by digger48

They treated her worse than a black dude with tits, or was horrible.

3 posted on 10/13/2019 4:30:41 PM PDT by BusterDog

Everybody is a victim.

4 posted on 10/13/2019 4:31:09 PM PDT by Don Corleone (nothing upsets the left more than the truth)

Shame on everybody? You’re not God, you frigging, dried up bitch. Die already!

5 posted on 10/13/2019 4:31:12 PM PDT by coaster123 (Distrust everyone under fifty.)

Constant victims, those 2....really are shining examples of strong women. /S

6 posted on 10/13/2019 4:32:46 PM PDT by BookmanTheJanitor

“I do want to say that the way she’s been treated is inexplicable,” the former Secretary of State told The Sunday Times of London in an interview.

“If the explanation is that she’s biracial, then shame on everybody,” Clinton said...

If it was inexplicable wouldn’t there be no explanation???

7 posted on 10/13/2019 4:34:30 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)

Bill Clinton was from Arkansas. He had racial hate in all he did in Little Rock. His Governor’s mansion was staffed by all blacks for low jobs. I saw it.

8 posted on 10/13/2019 4:34:36 PM PDT by Lumper20 (Our Congress must be stripped of FERS and AFGE union insurance..)

9 posted on 10/13/2019 4:34:45 PM PDT by Fungi

10 posted on 10/13/2019 4:35:48 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist

Respect from one grifter to another.

11 posted on 10/13/2019 4:37:25 PM PDT by TADSLOS (You know why you can enjoy a day at the Zoo? Because walls work.)

Neither here nor there, but who decided that "breaking the mold" was a good thing?

OK, so you "broke the mold". So what. That makes you so "special"? Kind of like breaking a Ming vase?

12 posted on 10/13/2019 4:39:06 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie (Everything I Needed to Know About Islam I Learned on 9/11)

She who knows everything must express an opinion. Vile, odious.

13 posted on 10/13/2019 4:39:10 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Apoplectic is where we want them)

Meghan Markle is targeted because she believes she is entitled.....what she is is an entitled biotch.

14 posted on 10/13/2019 4:40:23 PM PDT by originalbuckeye ('In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act'- George Orwell..?)

Is there anything Hillary Clinton is not an expert on? Just curious.

15 posted on 10/13/2019 4:40:27 PM PDT by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)

Homemade Controversy

OCTOBER 9, 2019 BLIND GOSSIP

[Blind Gossip] We’re here to serve up some homemade controversy!

The sudden flurry of legal activity around this actress and her husband seems poorly timed, doesn’t it?

After all, the events they are supposedly upset about happened over a year ago, and there was no outcry then.

In addition, the couple was just coming off a round of badly-need good publicity. Why create headlines that immediately took away from that? That is completely illogical.

Well, we might have the answer!

Yes, it was poorly timed, but their hand was forced. They needed a distraction to get ahead of the photos and video. They wanted to scare off the media so they would hesitate or decline to run the new story.

What are these photos and video?

It’s her. Allegedly, allegedly, allegedly. Sans clothing.

The photos show multiple occasions where a woman who looks like her has “her girls” out. Some look like they were taken by invasive paparazzi with a long lens. Others look more purposeful, as if they were taken by her or someone with her. Some have been published before. Some are new. If published, the photos would certainly create controversy.

The video is of a woman engaged in very explicit, consensual relations with a man. The woman strongly resembles her. However, much of the time her face is contorted in… umm… excitement. Thus, an exact match is challenging. We don’t recognize the man. It’s a homemade video, not a studio production. The camera was obviously set up by the couple and she faces the camera much of the time.

We honestly don’t know if it’s her. It looks like her… but it could be a doppelganger.

So, there you go. If you were wondering why their legal announcements were so out of the blue and so poorly timed, this might be the reason.

Risque selfies and homemade videos and legal action… they’re as American as apple pie!

Similar: Secret Video Of A Movie Star

Couple:

[Optional] What do you think is the real reason behind their legal actions?

16 posted on 10/13/2019 4:40:58 PM PDT by Bratch (IF YOU HAVE SELFISH IGNORANT CITIZENS, YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE SELFISH IGNORANT LEADERS-George Carlin)

The Royals have never had over the top tabloid coverage until Merkle. Sure thing.

Hillary is so stupid.

17 posted on 10/13/2019 4:41:53 PM PDT by ilgipper (The mob only destroys. Never creates.)

Liberals invent reasons to be victims.

18 posted on 10/13/2019 4:42:47 PM PDT by simpson96

To: Leaning Right

Is there anything Hillary Clinton is not an expert on? Just curious.

The male anatomy?

19 posted on 10/13/2019 4:42:50 PM PDT by Bratch (IF YOU HAVE SELFISH IGNORANT CITIZENS, YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE SELFISH IGNORANT LEADERS-George Carlin)

No, Hillary-it isn’t because of her racial makeup-it is because she is a clueless attention whore and gold digger-and she’s dumber than a box of rocks...

20 posted on 10/13/2019 4:44:19 PM PDT by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys-you've got to draw a hard line"...)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794