Skip to comments.
'LEAKED' LETTER CLAIM Meghan Markle ‘invaded her OWN privacy by leaking letter to dad at centre...
The Sun ^
| 10/4/2019
| emily andrews
Posted on 10/04/2019 5:06:56 AM PDT by RummyChick
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: yldstrk
Of course.. However, I think she could have been one tenth as manipulative and STILL got around Harry, with no trouble at all.
He’s such a mark
21
posted on
10/04/2019 5:50:29 AM PDT
by
SMARTY
("Nobility is defined by the demands it makes on us - by obligations, not by rights".)
To: SMARTY
He is a victim. When you are dealing with an evil narc like Megan, it is hard to even get out of bed in the morning. Life sucks for Harry.
22
posted on
10/04/2019 5:52:39 AM PDT
by
yldstrk
(Bingo! We have a winner!)
To: RummyChick
"she may have to swear on oath she did not give her friends permission to discuss the letter."Wouldn't it be awful if she got thrown in gaol for perjury!
23
posted on
10/04/2019 5:53:28 AM PDT
by
Savage Beast
(You'd think they'd learn from the Roadrunner Cartoons, but they just send off to Acme and try again.)
To: yldstrk
He wasn’t showing a lot of discretion, even before he met her. He was trying very hard to be ‘cool’ and got into one jackpot after another.
There was always a camera around, too. He should know better.
24
posted on
10/04/2019 5:55:43 AM PDT
by
SMARTY
("Nobility is defined by the demands it makes on us - by obligations, not by rights".)
To: RummyChick
this girl is a pain in the ass and an attention whore.
25
posted on
10/04/2019 6:00:11 AM PDT
by
ronniesgal
(so I wonder what his FR handle is????)
To: yldstrk
It’s really sad that now there’s a child involved.
26
posted on
10/04/2019 6:01:48 AM PDT
by
pnz1
(#IMNOTWITHHER)
To: nikos1121
Yes! The Brits thought Wallis Simpson was bad!
27
posted on
10/04/2019 6:01:56 AM PDT
by
Savage Beast
(You'd think they'd learn from the Roadrunner Cartoons, but they just send off to Acme and try again.)
To: Cecily
"They seem to have outsmarted themselves"It wasn't difficult.
28
posted on
10/04/2019 6:03:35 AM PDT
by
Savage Beast
(You'd think they'd learn from the Roadrunner Cartoons, but they just send off to Acme and try again.)
To: quilterdebbie
Wallis Simpson Not a proper analogy. For Harry to be similar to Edward VIII, he would need to have royal blood.
Harry has none.
To: yldstrk
Harry a victim? He certainly is an unconvincing one.
30
posted on
10/04/2019 6:06:56 AM PDT
by
Savage Beast
(You'd think they'd learn from the Roadrunner Cartoons, but they just send off to Acme and try again.)
To: RummyChick
Her father was the one who released the letter.
Her friends may have mentioned it (among many other things), but he released it.
To: RummyChick
She wrote the letter to her estranged Father, so it seems logical he might be the source of the leak.
32
posted on
10/04/2019 6:08:20 AM PDT
by
mac_truck
(aide toi et dieu t'aidera)
To: mac_truck
I don’t think that is in dispute. He gave the letter to the publisher.
The point is that when he DID NOT leak it, Meagain Markle pushed the issue by having her friends leak information on it.
thus forcing his hand
33
posted on
10/04/2019 6:11:03 AM PDT
by
RummyChick
("Pills, money .. this city is wicked. Your best friend will kill you here." Smoove about Baltimore)
To: nikos1121
"Reminds me of the American divorcee who married Edward (?)...What a despicable pair they were."VIII
Despicable? Like cozying up to Adolf Schicklgruber? Rather like Prince Harry cozying up to Obama, eh what?
34
posted on
10/04/2019 6:12:19 AM PDT
by
Savage Beast
(You'd think they'd learn from the Roadrunner Cartoons, but they just send off to Acme and try again.)
To: RummyChick
https://theconversation.com/meghan-markle-letter-what-the-law-says-about-the-press-privacy-and-the-publics-right-to-know-124619
Who has copyright?
Under UK copyright law, the owner of a piece of work is usually the person who created it. Once a person owns copyright in a piece of work, the law allows them to restrict others from copying or sharing that work without permission. So, the content of the letter belongs to the writer of the letter – although the actual physical letter belongs to the recipient.
This means that in order to share the content of a letter, the permission of the writer would be required in order to avoid copyright infringement.
35
posted on
10/04/2019 6:16:02 AM PDT
by
RummyChick
("Pills, money .. this city is wicked. Your best friend will kill you here." Smoove about Baltimore)
To: RummyChick
Harry....what were you thinking.
To: Savage Beast
Yeah, she’s a skank...through and through....
To: mac_truck
Problem for her is that no one is interested in her relationship with her father. She uses it to get sympathy. No one cares.
38
posted on
10/04/2019 7:23:07 AM PDT
by
dandiegirl
(BOBBY)
To: boycott
The Royals get a stipend from the government. While they were independently wealthy, it’s not like they have unlimited government money.
Of course, the family has so much money that it would seem unlimited for you and me.
To: Cecily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson