Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Putin Needs to Bury This Relic of Stalin
Moscow Times ^ | Aug 2019 | L. Bershidsky

Posted on 08/25/2019 6:48:46 PM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege

As Europe marks 80 years of the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, which carved up eastern Europe between the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany, Russia is trying to defend the agreement again. There is no political benefit to doing this. President Vladimir Putin needs to abandon his Stalinist inheritance of a foreign policy based solely on national interest.

If Moscow needed any reminder that many in eastern Europe still hold the treaty against it and still consider it a threat, plenty came on the anniversary. The governments of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Romania – the countries directly affected by the pact’s secret protocol – issued a joint statement saying the document “sparked World War II and doomed half of Europe to decades of misery.”

Russia is fighting back. In Moscow, the original of the treaty is now exhibited alongside documents relating to both the 1938 Munich Agreement, where British and French leaders sanctioned the Nazi annexation of the Sudetenland, and Poland’s subsequent invasion of part of Czechoslovakia.

At the opening of the exhibition earlier this week, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov spoke of Britain and France’s treachery: By cozying up to Hitler, they forced the Soviet Union to sign a deal with the Nazis to ensure its own security, he said.

In 1989, the Soviet Union, too, officially condemned the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact — but subsequent Russian communications about it, including an entire article signed by Putin himself in the Polish daily Gazeta Wyborcza, have come with the caveat that lots of others were at it, too.

These excuses are a major reason other European countries don’t trust Russia: To them, Putin and his subordinates are saying that Moscow would do something like this all over again if its interests dictated it, small countries be damned.

(Excerpt) Read more at themoscowtimes.com ...


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: hitler; putin; russia; stalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 08/25/2019 6:48:46 PM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

‘At the opening of the exhibition earlier this week, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov spoke of Britain and France’s treachery: By cozying up to Hitler, they forced the Soviet Union to sign a deal with the Nazis to ensure its own security, he said.”

Well, I can’t disagree much with that. All the countries of Europe (including those in Eastern Europe) were jockeying around for position in 1938-1939.


2 posted on 08/25/2019 6:53:40 PM PDT by CondorFlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondorFlight

Stalin was always forced to act. He was such a kind and gentle person who would have never ordered the cold blooded murder of at 20,000 poles unless other people forced him to.

He was forced to fake evidence about their deaths at the Nuremberg trials. He was forced to lie about their fate to his allies during and after the war.

He had no choice.


3 posted on 08/25/2019 7:04:22 PM PDT by highpockets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: highpockets

Interesting. Trump/Putin the same as 1939. Trump is not naive but the Germans are.


4 posted on 08/25/2019 7:22:30 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Putin is Stalin....


5 posted on 08/25/2019 7:33:13 PM PDT by rrrod (just an old guy with a gun in his pocket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

The American left adores Stalin and they will never admit it or may not even know it. FDR gave Stalin the keys to post WWII world.


6 posted on 08/25/2019 7:46:39 PM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Actually, while the feeling may have been mutual, the national socialist in Germany and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics did ink the deal to divide Eastern Europe.

Western governments really did not know the extent, but did suspect something bad, and were afraid. There were attempts to try and ascertain what was up.

At the same time, Germany was in part strategically posturing out of fear of the Soviet Union. Hence the effort to ink in a deal for taking the spoils Eastern Europe, even if it was not really the goal.

Stalin was an even more horrific and brutal monster than Lenin, since the death of Lenin in 24.


7 posted on 08/25/2019 8:02:37 PM PDT by patriotfury ((May the fleas of a thousand camels occupy mo' ham mads tents!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shanover

“FDR gave Stalin the keys to post WWII world.”

>
That was why FDR was the greatest President.

He didn’t let Russophobe Hitler & Hirohito get the keys.


8 posted on 08/25/2019 8:04:19 PM PDT by granada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: patriotfury

the western governments had already betrayed and abandoned pathetic Eastern Europe. The Munich Agreement.


9 posted on 08/25/2019 8:10:04 PM PDT by granada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

But hey, why should Stalin worry, when he could get double the returns from FDR than he would get from Adolf, in exchange for an inked in agreement to help us take down Russia’s long time impediment Japan, as long as we would move allied forces out of China. You know... to help provide an easier path for the Russians to help us out and all. And... so that Russia could finally have a path to spread communism into China.

What could possibly go wrong in the future with such a compromise. /S


10 posted on 08/25/2019 8:16:05 PM PDT by patriotfury ((May the fleas of a thousand camels occupy mo' ham mads tents!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: highpockets

With all the respect to these people who didn’t deserve to die their deaths were a rather minor thing in a grand scheme of things. And for Poland too because the Nazi killed millions there.


11 posted on 08/25/2019 8:19:43 PM PDT by NorseViking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: granada

There was a plan of alliance after a Spanish civil war between USSR, France and UK to join forces in case of Nazi attack on any of the above.
Poland was a Nazi ally complicit in dismembering Czechoslovakia at the time and refused a transit rights to the Soviet army in case of such event.
Then France and UK decided Hitler would leave them alone and would be busy in East Europe establishing ‘Lebenstraum’.
At this point Stalin had two choices. To attack Germany all alone and to become a condemned aggressor or appeasement. It was too obvious to do the very same everyone else were doing.
The universal condemnation of Molotov-Ribbentropp Pact is a result of Limey and Frog butthurt. They didn’t deserve to get attacked for their appeasement!
Poland wasn’t that fluffy little kitten it tries to portray itself.
I have a deep respect towards Polish people but there are moments in the past they should be ashamed of.


12 posted on 08/25/2019 8:34:13 PM PDT by NorseViking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: granada

Agreed!

Hence one of the reasons Trump got all up into Mercle’s grill about $150-$200 Billion in energy deals with Moscow, again, at the expense of Eastern European security in the face of Putin.

Slightly different circumstances today, although there were commodities in the calculus back then as well. Regardless, we have an oximoronic Moscow/Berlin axis of sorts, as well as great Eastern European concern right now.

And our posture has been trying to be a break or match for a very rapid Russian build up, in both EUCOM and CENTCOM AOR’s

What’s old is new. Strategically, it is about control of the flow of energy, as well as military superiority, in an attempt to gain a dominant influence over European and even Asian economic and foreign policy.

As well, the Eastern Med, and the shipping lanes are at stake right now as well.


13 posted on 08/25/2019 8:39:46 PM PDT by patriotfury ((May the fleas of a thousand camels occupy mo' ham mads tents!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NorseViking
Poland was a Nazi ally complicit in dismembering Czechoslovakia at the time and refused a transit rights to the Soviet army in case of such event.

Horseshit.

14 posted on 08/25/2019 8:40:43 PM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Yes not pretty but it did happen. Josef Beck a Polish secretary of state was in Germany in January 1938 to discuss annexation of Zaolzie as Germans were planning taking over Sudetenland.
On May 12, 1938 the Soviets promised the Czechs intervention in case of a German attack. France backed the Soviets.
Then Poland declared it would refuse Soviet military transit rights in case of both German invasion or Czechia or France.
These are facts regardless do people like it or not.


15 posted on 08/25/2019 8:54:28 PM PDT by NorseViking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NorseViking

Czechs took advantage of the Poles saving Europe from Bolshevism in 1920 and took that area, even though it was mostly inhabited by Poles.

The Germans didn’t care what the Poles did, because they knew they’d have it all in due time anyway.


16 posted on 08/25/2019 8:58:35 PM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

That’s true as well. The same partly applies to Molotov-Ribbentrop.


17 posted on 08/25/2019 9:00:14 PM PDT by NorseViking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NorseViking

But to claim that Poland and Nazi Germany were ever allies is just plain ludicrous.


18 posted on 08/25/2019 9:03:53 PM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

You might be technically right but the same once again applies to Molotov-Ribbentrop.
Although some might think the refusal of Soviet transit rights has certain features of siding with Germany against France, let alone Czechia.


19 posted on 08/25/2019 9:14:24 PM PDT by NorseViking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

“Controversial problems [between Germany and Russia] did not, in my opinion, exist anywhere along the line from the Baltic Sea to the Black Sea and to the Far East. In addition, despite all the divergencies in their views of life, there was one thing common to the ideology of Germany, Italy and the Soviet Union: opposition to the capitalist democracies in the West.”—Julius Schnurre, Nazi trade rep to Russia.

Rise and Fall of the Third Reich by Shirer. Page 501 in my copy,


20 posted on 08/25/2019 9:48:02 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson