Posted on 07/23/2019 3:19:17 PM PDT by EdnaMode
British actor-comedian Ricky Gervais has been branded transphobic by LGBT activists after he defended the right of women not to wax the testicles of a transgender person who identifies as a woman.
The debate started after Gervais weighed in on a recent controversy in Canada, where an immigrant woman who ran a Brazilian waxing business was forced to shut down after being sued for refusing to wax a transgender womans genitalia. Another fifteen other female business owners have also been taken to court by the same trans individual, who argues that their refusal amounts to gender discrimination.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
There are plenty of women out there who wax gay guys.
This was another organized “Cake Attack”
Some of these activists will start disappearing one day.
And society will be better for it.
L
If it has testicles it’s not a woman.
99% of all “feminists” are traitors to their own cause.
If you cut them off it wouldn’t change anything!
It would be a man with no testicles - a Rat politician!
Gervais is big into gay rights so, yet again, it’s another case of not being LGBTQ-friendly enough. At this rate, the next civil war might end up being trans vs gay/lesbian!
” being sued for refusing to wax a transgender womans genitalia.”
For all the out-and-proud nonsense aside, the “transwoman’s genitalia” consists of a penis and testicles.
Why so coy now when the contingent has never been shy, coy, or reticent about using terminology that would make the most profane stevadore blush?
Come on! The “transwoman’s genitalia?’
Say it loud. The worker did not want to handle a penis and balls.
And she had every right to refuse.
As a father with two daughters in sports I am now in a position of being called some kind of phobic if I do not want my daughters to compete against a male who claims to be a female?
This is so preposterous it sounds like a Saturday Night Live skit from only 10 years ago. To borrow from Churchill with some license, “never before in history have so many been controlled by so few.”
This is insane.
Precisely. The tubby little Englishman gets it right.
Can the woman owned businesses sue for sexual assault?
Regardless of how a man dresses or what he calls himself, he should have no expectation that any woman would be willing to touch his genitals in the guise of a business transaction. Sounds to me like this guy has a fetish about getting women who dont know him to touch him, and hes come up with a clever way to act out his fantasy. From the fact that 15 other woman business owners have also complained, it sounds like he is a serial pervert.
“Another fifteen other female business owners have also been taken to court by the same trans individual”
Vendetta.
I hear you.
One shows up and acosts my grandchildren in a public bathroom or anywhere else and granny lets one fly.
My perceived species is Neanderthal and I identify as Lion Clan. Culturally, decking people with a left to the chin is a love tap.
Try that on for size. After all, according to the left, perception is reality.
It is totally insane, but look at the bright side: The left is utterly destroying their chances when it comes to elections. The more insane they get the more they are turning people off. People are seeing that Trump is right about a lot of things. Remember his criticism about the corrupt politicians in Puerto Rico and all the leftists called him racist? Now people are seeing he was spot on 100% right.
Freaks
How did our society get so far off the rails?
Rhetorical question. We all know the obama Administration enabled this nonsense that would have been unthinkable before he and his fellow freaks made this happen.
Um...I’m still stuck on the pain this would/could cause...
If you cut them off it wouldnt change anything!
It would be a man with no testicles - a Rat politician!
You mean a Ryno
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.