Aside from the surface message, my next reaction to that is that it used to be the IBM motto. Significant?
Govco and MSM so infiltrated with corruption it takes control of the military to win back our freedom.
Me? I don’t know. Too many irons in the fire.
It’s a thought.
Happy Hunting!
>> Some have proffered an idea that “Q” might be AI
I have never seriously considered that as a possibility. Until now!
I have a “rough sketch” for a predictive algorithm for some s/w I’m writing, but the Q stuff is so far beyond that. Not impossible to imagine, but definitely mind-boggling!
If Q is an AI, then I’d bet that Q scrapes the internet/headlines to use in decision-making. And clearly Q posts a lot of links.
And if Q is an AI that scrapes the internet for info to post, that would completely eliminate the possibility of anyone being Q and therefore there is no Q who is prosecutable. The only persons who could be in danger of prosecution would be if someone posted something illegally that Q scraped.
Remember how the Krassenstein brothers were always 1st to respond to POTUS tweets? I assume they had s/w that alerted them and/or auto-posted replies.
So how to explain all of the Q proofs when Q beat POTUS? It could be that there were predefined key words along with times given to Q AI and also given to POTUS (or someone using POTUS twitter acct). That could have accomplished the synchronization.
Many of them are. Though every post would have to be approved. Using the chess board to tell us of a nuclear missile attack in advance was a good example. To express this you have to explain the attack in reverse.
It's like telling an elaborate story with the starting point of a single object. Which most novels are made this way but you have to know the ending before you create the object/beginning.
I would say its both. advanced AI with exceptionally intelligent humans giving it life. They need both.
Remember "Q" are psycops. it's legal now to give us false propaganda under Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012. Never forget that. That doesn't mean they're not on our side.