Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Durham investigating FBI AND Hillary
CBS ^ | 5/31/2019 | CBS

Posted on 05/31/2019 10:15:25 PM PDT by struggle

JAN CRAWFORD: Um, what's the status of Huber's investigation in Utah? I think the former Attorney General Sessions had asked him to look at this.

WILLIAM BARR: Right, so Huber had originally been asked to take a look at the FISA applications and the electronic surveillance but then he stood back and put that on hold while the Office of Inspector General was conducting its review, which would've been normal for the department. And he was essentially on standby in case Mr. Horowitz referred a matter to him to be handled criminally. So he has not been active on this front in recent months and so Durham is taking over that role. The other issues he's been working on relate to Hillary Clinton. Those are winding down and hopefully we'll be in a position to bring those to fruition.

JAN CRAWFORD: So he won't be involved in this really at all then?

WILLIAM BARR: No.

JAN CRAWFORD: This is his role, it's done?

WILLIAM BARR: Right.

JAN CRAWFORD: And now Durham is going to pick up--

WILL BARR: Yes, right.

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: donothingsob; durham; faketitle; fbi; hillary; hube; huber; smallgroup
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: struggle

“Protecting sources and methods”

Isn’t that the point here? Sources and methods were criminal. No need to protect. Expose!


61 posted on 06/01/2019 4:54:11 AM PDT by mom.mom (...our flag was still there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: struggle

So Horowitz found nothing that could be charged criminally t
O refer to Huber? That really gives me confidence that any of these crooks will be held accountable.


62 posted on 06/01/2019 5:16:16 AM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ballplayer

They are not. This is going nowhere. Barr is a longtime DC insider. Comey, McCabe etc....he knows them as well as he knows mueller. This is a show. Barr wants to gain our trust so we “accept it” when he says nothing chargeable. It is all show.


63 posted on 06/01/2019 5:31:48 AM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

The first thing Barr did was to end the Mueller sh!t show. Next he woke Huber up and bum rushed his worthless a$$ out of town. I’m hoping when Barr gets Horowitz’s second whitewash he’ll say, “f that, I’m declassifying every word”.


64 posted on 06/01/2019 5:41:14 AM PDT by hardspunned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

Fruition - it’s an interesting choice of words from someone who selects them carefully.


65 posted on 06/01/2019 5:50:56 AM PDT by Beach333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

“And those saying Horowitz and Huber (Sessions) were frauds have been proved right.”

All we can do is wait and see.


66 posted on 06/01/2019 5:56:24 AM PDT by semaj (We are the People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jazminerose

Would you mind telling us what you see as the trap? TIA


67 posted on 06/01/2019 5:57:28 AM PDT by Beach333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: struggle
But I just view that- I don’t view it as a bureau wide issue.

I do, how come not one single FBI agent came forward as a whistle blower. Not a one.

68 posted on 06/01/2019 6:02:02 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Re: Worked for Pres Reagan - what else do we need to now?

Plenty.

Most important, all eight Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee voted to confirm Barr as Attorney General in 1991.

That was the same gang of Democrats that destroyed Robert Bork, and tried to destroy Clarence Thomas.

But they voted 8-0 to confirm William Barr.

So far, so good with the 2019 version of Barr, but I'll wait another year before I decide how Conservative he is.

69 posted on 06/01/2019 6:05:53 AM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: struggle

If Hillary were being seriously investigated her IT guy, the one that destroyed her server and lied to the FBI about it would be in jail. Huber was a Sessions head fake, he ain’t doing squat. We’ll see what Barr and Durham do, if they don’t arrest the IT guy then you know they are not doing squat either.


70 posted on 06/01/2019 6:07:08 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

Huber is doing a great job.


71 posted on 06/01/2019 6:09:05 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Isn't it funny that the very people who scream "My body, my choice" wants a say in your healthcare?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: atc23

In the meantime— would like to know if this crazed lesbo still has a security clearance— because it most certainly should have been removed.

I ask this because, yesterday here on FR, there was a posting of this harridan, this horror, this criminal— being hired as a “keynote” speaker at a major Cyber security conference- the conference of those “bidders” for cyber security to the US govt. In other words the Beltway trough eating siphoners of federal dollars for “cyber security services”... who are interested in contracts, and who provide un secure and in some cases “resold” security to US mil and intel “agencies” (the lesser ones and some of the major ones). The corrupt people.. like CrowdStrike (a russian entity, imho).

Thought it was a joke but it is not- former secState Cybercriminal- who sold her office for donations to her grifting “charity” organization from our enemies and every country she carried a bag into-— this person hired to speak on ... Cybersecurity. What, is she going to be on a pane with Comey chatting-— for 500K?

People still pulling OUR fed dollars out of the labyrinthine govt. coffers-— for useless corrupt shiite. And maybe selling it to Foreign intel or intermediaries. Tiring.


72 posted on 06/01/2019 6:16:33 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

A BIG part of the Clinton Crime Family SLUSH FUND was moved to CANADA because they have a LAW that you CANNOT find out who DONATES to any “charity”!


73 posted on 06/01/2019 6:18:35 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: struggle

Where is there a quote that Hillary is being investigated?


74 posted on 06/01/2019 6:19:46 AM PDT by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

Huber is a joke. He should be liable to the tax payers for wasting money.


75 posted on 06/01/2019 6:21:04 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: struggle

I think AG Barr is enjoying this...actually having fun.


76 posted on 06/01/2019 6:31:19 AM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: struggle

The way I read it it says that Huber is investigating Hillary.


77 posted on 06/01/2019 6:37:06 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

Sadly I think you are right.

Let me remind people of this.

In 2018, I began a research project to find out what, if anything was happening in Little Rock.

I located Cody Hiland, Sessions’ appointee there. (Right there, you know we’re in trouble). He supposedly was investigating the Clinton Crime Family Foundation (CCFF). Did he have a Grand Jury empaneled? Were there infamous “sealed indictments?”

Well, I found a phone number for the office of the Little Rock grand jury, which handles jurors, etc. It confirmed there was a Grand Jury. Yay.

Next I began reading local Little Rock papers. There were two really big issues: drug gangs and a corrupt state level pol from LR.

I located 60 “sealed indictments” from that region. Now comes the bad news.

After a couple of months, the prosecutor’s office unsealed half of the 60 sealed indictments. ALL 30 were gun charges. Now, it’s possible that some of the remaining 30 were related to Cankles, but highly, highly unlikely. Almost certainly the remaining 30 were drug charges related to the gun arrests that were being used as leverage.

Next, the Little Rock papers announced that said pol had been convicted of crimes. Almost certainly that was what the Grand Jury was looking at. Meanwhile, not a word from Cody Hiland on anything to do with the CCFF.

The final piece of news is this: months later, a Little Rock TV station announced a federal jet was loading boxes. The station SPECULATED that these were from the CCFF (which would make no sense. If there was a prosecution, the feds would have far more chance of getting Cankles in LR than in a VA court). Anyway, the report was derived from a LR conservative talk radio host who said, “Do we know that these boxes contain material from the CCFF? WE DON’T.” It was all, 100%, pure speculation.

Oh, and earlier in 2018 I corresponded with an atty in the NOVA area who was familiar with “sealed indictments” in the DC region-—you know, the so called “60,000 sealed indictments” that were gonna be used in front of “military tribunals”? In this case there were about 200. He looked at the information provided by the court on these-—yes, there is info that includes dates and case numbers, but no names. Well, virtually all of them, he said, looked like standard cases that reflected continuances, changes of venue, and other court housekeeping items that every trial goes through. (Remember how Flynn had a dozen “sentencing” appearances, only to have a continuance?). His conclusion was that only one or two even remotely appeared to be a new case and that those almost certainly were drug cases.

FWIW.


78 posted on 06/01/2019 7:04:47 AM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: struggle

The most interesting thing Barr (PrisonBarrs) said was that Huber had done nothing in over a year. He stood aside for Horowitz . . . who could do nothing except report.

So all the stuff over a year that “Huber is coming” was a joke.

Now, I do believe PrisonBarrs is “more” serious about looking into this, but a reality bath came last week when an unnamded Deputy Assistant Director (almost certainly Peter Stzrok-—Deep Stroke) was given a pass: “declined to prosecute” was the phrase.

Folks, if they can’t get Deep Stroke, they can’t get anybody. So I have a feeling-—and I really hope I’m wrong-—that Bull Durham and PrisonBarrs will find a ton of inconsistencies, non-standarad behavior, blah, blah boilerplate language, but will “decline to prosecute.”

Oh, and remember last year we had a similar unnamed FBI agent and “decline to prosecute?” And the Awans? “Decline to prosecute?”


79 posted on 06/01/2019 7:08:25 AM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: struggle

Nothing sticks to the Queen of Teflon.


80 posted on 06/01/2019 7:52:44 AM PDT by bgill (when you badmouth women, you are badmouthing your mama and the good women on FR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson