How so? BOTH Amash and Tlaib swear up and down that their loyalty is the U.S. constitution and that Trump needs to be impeached because "the constitution demands it" (Tlaib even circulated a tweet to her colleagues with a book that makes the case for that), so there's no difference in there in using a "my voting record is solely to defend the U.S. Constitution" talking point to shield themselves for criticism for their treasonous actions/votes. They say they're just doing for "Constitutional" reasons and not because of any personal bias. They'd have us believe that the framers somehow forced them to vote the way HAMAS wants.
BOTH of them are likewise the children of Palestinian "refugee" immigrants, from a Michigan Arab community who vote the position of the Palestinian Authority far more than they vote the way American citizens want. Amash is loyal to communist China because he has invested critical businesses overseas in China to boot.
BOTH are vehemently against Trump's foreign policy, record on Israel, actions to crack down on radical Islam, immigration policies, etc., and have been outspoken against Trump since day one, long before the Mueller report or anything happened.
The only noteworthy difference is that Tlaib identifies as a Democrat and a Muslim whereas Amash identifies as a "Republican" and a "Christian". But doesn't change the fact he has far, far more in common with a Muslim Democrat than he does his "fellow" Christian Republicans.
You can’t get beyond the one thing Amash said because of your blind loyalty to the president, no matter what. If you look at Amash’s whole record over his years in Congress, he has a very high liberty score and a demonstrated fealty to constitutional principles.
Tlaib, OTOH, has a record that shows her utter contempt for the Constitution, America, and liberty. She clearly has a foreign loyalty — as does Omar — and I wouldn’t be surprised f she’s a foreign agent.
You have to look at the entire record.