Skip to comments.
Killer asteroid flattens New York in simulation exercise
Phys.org ^
| 05/04/2019
Posted on 05/04/2019 7:42:52 PM PDT by BenLurkin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: BenLurkin
Simulated women and minorities hardest hit...
21
posted on
05/04/2019 8:59:55 PM PDT
by
OrangeHoof
(Trump is Making the Media Grate Again)
To: cdcdawg
$5 billion in improvements.
22
posted on
05/04/2019 9:00:06 PM PDT
by
rktman
( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: EasySt
Is that a book or a movie. Looks interesting. Anytime I need a ride off this rock, I use my Electronic Thumb. And a towel. Always have a towel handy.
To: Redcitizen
Just something I nicked in my travels... ;-)
24
posted on
05/04/2019 9:15:03 PM PDT
by
EasySt
(Say not this is the truth, but so it seems to me to be, as I see this thing I think I see #KAG)
To: BenLurkin
Nothing ruins property values more than an impending asteroid strike, except muslimes moving into the neighborhood. Tbats worse.
25
posted on
05/04/2019 9:25:24 PM PDT
by
griffin
To: Vermont Lt
Did you mean Deep Impact?
26
posted on
05/05/2019 2:15:27 AM PDT
by
ozaukeemom
(9/11/01 Never Forget. Never.)
To: BenLurkin
This 'exercise' is nothing but scare mongering. It's so unrealistic that it's not even disguised. The land area of large cities around the world is tiny compared with all the rest of the millions of square miles of totally uninhabited area. The odds of an errant asteroid hitting, not one, but two of the largest cities in the US, is vanishing small. Just think of throwing random darts at a spinning globe of the earth. What are the odds of one of the darts hitting, not one, but two US large cities? Note that the known meteor 'explosions' over the last century, or so, hit mostly uninhabited areas.
The line that indecisiveness prevented a second deflection attempt is equally absurd. It was demonstrated that the first deflection strike actually worked. How could anyone prevent another, especially when the new target is New York City?
27
posted on
05/05/2019 4:10:21 AM PDT
by
norwaypinesavage
(Calm down and enjoy the ride, great things are happening for our country)
To: Governor Dinwiddie
If only. Too bad it's only a simulation. You are not alone.......
28
posted on
05/05/2019 4:22:32 AM PDT
by
metmom
( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
To: BenLurkin
AND..................that’s a BAD thing?
29
posted on
05/05/2019 4:27:00 AM PDT
by
Flintlock
("FIRST the Saturday people, THEN the Sunday people"--gee whatever do they mean by that?)
To: BenLurkin
Gee, I was hoping it would be DC....
30
posted on
05/05/2019 4:36:25 AM PDT
by
unread
(Joe McCarthy was right.......)
To: ozaukeemom
Oh jeez..yes. Sudden impact was on the other day. It was in my head. I got the names confused.
31
posted on
05/05/2019 4:58:28 AM PDT
by
Vermont Lt
(If we get Medicare for all, will we have to show IDs for service?)
To: BenLurkin
So in about 8 years there’s a 1% chance that an asteroid will hit earth. OK, but how do they come up with the idea it will hit a major city in the US such as Denver or NYC?
Have they calculated the exact trajectory of the object relative to what part of the earth will be in that path at that exact minute? (keeping in mind the earth is both rotating around the sun and spinning at the same time)
IMO this is climate change grade science at work creating fear. The so called scientists live in their big city democrat bubble and only worry about a rat infested metropolis. If they knew for fact it would hit Rapid City, SD they could care less about those people and worry about the dust fallout drifting towards rat cities.
To: Vermont Lt
Meteor gas been floating around YouTube, maybe some of the PTBS can watch it.
33
posted on
05/05/2019 6:49:02 AM PDT
by
wally_bert
(Disc jockeys are as interchangeable as spark plugs.)
To: MIchaelTArchangel
“most impacted”
heh, heh. Is that like “most squashed”?
To: BenLurkin
If it was a simulation, then why couldn’t they tune a few parameters to assure 100% success? How do you program a simulation to predict failure?
I suppose they used Monte Carlo Simulation and ran a hundred thousand simulation runs with a fault tree and assigned probabilities.
The notion of us unintentionally breaking off a chunk of the asteroid which then hits the earth has been around a long time.
To: TigersEye
“Simulations dont provide adequate training exercises.”
Absolutely. We need to run some carefully controlled experiments.
To: MIchaelTArchangel
Women, children and minorities most impacted.
Hello, I’m from the DHS and I want to order
150 million doses of Exlax...
37
posted on
05/05/2019 9:21:51 AM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: EasySt
To: 75thOVI; Abathar; agrace; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AnalogReigns; AndrewC; aragorn; ...
39
posted on
05/05/2019 11:23:35 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
To: redfreedom
Have they calculated the exact trajectory of the object relative to what part of the earth will be in that path at that exact minute? (keeping in mind the earth is both rotating around the sun and spinning at the same time) Celestial mechanics can do some pretty nifty computations.
40
posted on
05/05/2019 1:46:29 PM PDT
by
Roccus
(When you talk to a politician...ANY politician...always say, "Remember Ceausescu")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson