|
Posted on 03/22/2019 12:47:30 PM PDT by ransomnote
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this transformation as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3028)
We discuss Q drop content on our threads to learn the truth about the capture of our country, after a lifetime of reading, watching and listening to lies and distortions used to control us and tame the American spirit. The truth shall set us free.
For summaries of Q drops (i.e., posts) discussed on our threads, I invite you to read the latest editions of The Oracle, which include helpful links and quotes to explain Q drop content.
Q drops can be found here in their original format.
Links to our Q threads, and Q drops posted on our threads, are listed in this table.
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?" Another excellent source for identifying Q's involvement with President Trump is found at the website titled Qproofs.com.
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between Good and Evil, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. The changes heading our way and the information revealed will, at times, be very difficult to face, but we will face it together. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger for having reclaimed the truth and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Note: Links in the post above are included in a resource table in Post #1 below, along with many additional excellent links to the best Q analysts and informations sources we've identified.
Actually those were answer tweets to Posobiec, not statements from him. Howie Carr is a Boston radio talk show host, and at the time was the court room reporter for most of the Bulger proceedings
Thread is probably now closed, I am behind, but thanks for the reply.
In these strange and extraordinary times, I am apt to believe that the Assange incident could be possible.
Eyes wide open now.
ThankQ.
thanks
Re: child porno chart of evil doers/revolting deeds
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Wow, what a bunch of scumbags.
Sicko pedos at every turn.
Rhetorical Q...what is wrong with these people?
Thread prob closed, late in catching up.
Thanks for sharing the diagram of degenerates.
Or a mozlum named Omar?
My understanding is that an independet counsel (Ken Starr, for example) must work independently of all agencies and develop its own evidence. That law was sunsetted. A Special Counsel works for the Dept of Justice under the Attorney General or his/her designee.
Democrats press for full release of Mueller’s report.
*************************************************************************************
In martial arts, if someone throws a punch, you don’t directly hit that fist with your own. Instead you dodge the punch, and grab the arm and take the whole body in the direction that was already started.
So the DEMS will likely get what they ask for, and too late realize the trap they have sprung on their own heads.
Release it ALL!!!
This post begins the ANTARCTICA DIG REPORT, “ANTARCTICA - WHAT’S GOING ON?”
with 12 Parts. In an effort to try to fulfill the requests for two different formats, here follows the LONGER VERSION:
All of these posts can be found as replies to post seven of this thread:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3736607/posts?page=7#7
ANTARCTICA - WHAT’S GOING ON?
PART ONE
There I was. Just minding my business, drinking my covfefe, and enjoying lurking on the Q thread. As often happens, a FReeQ posted something that assaulted my curiosity.
In this case,
Gen it was completely unfair. I had no fighting chance! I had not heard about all that regarding the famous people going to Antarctica. Or maybe I had, and just had not pondered it at all.
Down the bunny hole I went. I had not realized the extent of the numbers of prominent people who had been there. I don’t know why, but I arbitrarily fastened my attention on John F’n Kerry first. I dimly recall reports of him going there, but really had not followed it.
So, why did he go? And when?
It turns out that John F’n Kerry (did you know he served in Viet Nam?) went to Antarctica at a VERY strange time, given his position as Secretary of State.
Max Bearak reported in the Washington Post of November 7, 2016 that JOHN F’N KERRY - WHO SERVED IN VIET NAM - WENT TO ANTARCTICA ON ELECTION DAY, 11/8/16!
Well, there was no turning back. The boiler plate of the story was that he had planned it long in advance and that it was all about Climate Change being the reason for the visit.
Perhaps so.
I kept searching about his visit. I was not able to find anything from good sources, aside from the aforementioned “Climate Change” which is the explanation for the visit.
But I did find a press release from the Pew Trusts….From MARCH 18, 2013, which shows Kerry’s interest and involvement in the subject.
In this article we are told that The Pew Trusts organized a big meeting about protecting the Southern Ocean.
“Pew to host diplomatic gathering as Ross Sea decision approaches
“With less than four months until a long-awaited decision on new protections for portions of the Antarctic Southern Ocean, The Pew Charitable Trusts today will welcome U.S. Secretary of State John F. Kerry and ambassadors from around the world to discuss proposed marine protected areas in the Southern Ocean, including the U.S.-New Zealand effort to create the largest marine protected area on Earth in the Ross Sea….”
“…The Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources, or CCAMLR, was formed in 1982 to address the conservation and sustainable use of marine life in the Southern Ocean. It makes decisions by consensus….”
They had tried earlier in 2011,
“…But the commission could not reach consensus,”
So, March 18, 2013, they planned to try again. Pew Trusts was hosting the international gathering in Bremerhaven, Germany.
Perhaps it should be noted Hillary Clinton resigned from the Office of Secretary of State on Feb. 1, 2013. Only a month and a half later, John F’n Kerry (W.S.I.V.N.) was involved in a huge international meeting regarding ANTARCTICA and the waters around her.
And then, on election day, potentially the last day he would hold power as Secretary of State, without potentially being a lame duck, guess where he is? ANTARCTICA. Of course for another international meeting.
The 2013 press release by The Pew Trusts makes much of their activities in support of the various environmental issues regarding the Southern Ocean. Joshua Reichert, the executive VP of the Pew Charitable Trusts, makes much of global warming. I suppose they had not gotten the memo yet that people were starting to see through that and that we would soon be talking about “climate change:”
“…”The Ross Sea is one of the most pristine places left on Earth,” said Joshua Reichert, executive vice president of The Pew Charitable Trusts. “It now faces challenges, brought on in great part by the warming of the earth’s climate, that threaten to alter the fragile web of life that has endured for millennia. While we cannot prevent some of these changes from taking place, we can protect it from other types of pressures such as industrial fishing that will further exacerbate disruption….”
I wondered about this paragon, Mr Reichert, and looked for other work by him in the Pew Trusts web site. There were several stories I found, with more available at some links which I did not follow. The oldest one I saw reached back to 2006.
I noticed a list of names in the left margin. I did not know any of them…..until I saw…the name of a famous person.
We will get into that in the next part.
END PART ONE
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
This post begins the ANTARCTICA DIG REPORT, “ANTARCTICA - WHAT’S GOING ON?”
with 12 Parts. In an effort to try to fulfill the requests for two different formats, here follows the LONGER VERSION:
All of these posts can be found as replies to post seven of this thread:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3736607/posts?page=7#7
ANTARCTICA - WHAT’S GOING ON?
PART ONE
There I was. Just minding my business, drinking my covfefe, and enjoying lurking on the Q thread. As often happens, a FReeQ posted something that assaulted my curiosity.
In this case,
Gen it was completely unfair. I had no fighting chance! I had not heard about all that regarding the famous people going to Antarctica. Or maybe I had, and just had not pondered it at all.
Down the bunny hole I went. I had not realized the extent of the numbers of prominent people who had been there. I don’t know why, but I arbitrarily fastened my attention on John F’n Kerry first. I dimly recall reports of him going there, but really had not followed it.
So, why did he go? And when?
It turns out that John F’n Kerry (did you know he served in Viet Nam?) went to Antarctica at a VERY strange time, given his position as Secretary of State.
Max Bearak reported in the Washington Post of November 7, 2016 that JOHN F’N KERRY - WHO SERVED IN VIET NAM - WENT TO ANTARCTICA ON ELECTION DAY, 11/8/16!
Well, there was no turning back. The boiler plate of the story was that he had planned it long in advance and that it was all about Climate Change being the reason for the visit.
Perhaps so.
I kept searching about his visit. I was not able to find anything from good sources, aside from the aforementioned “Climate Change” which is the explanation for the visit.
But I did find a press release from the Pew Trusts….From MARCH 18, 2013, which shows Kerry’s interest and involvement in the subject.
In this article we are told that The Pew Trusts organized a big meeting about protecting the Southern Ocean.
“Pew to host diplomatic gathering as Ross Sea decision approaches
“With less than four months until a long-awaited decision on new protections for portions of the Antarctic Southern Ocean, The Pew Charitable Trusts today will welcome U.S. Secretary of State John F. Kerry and ambassadors from around the world to discuss proposed marine protected areas in the Southern Ocean, including the U.S.-New Zealand effort to create the largest marine protected area on Earth in the Ross Sea….”
“…The Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources, or CCAMLR, was formed in 1982 to address the conservation and sustainable use of marine life in the Southern Ocean. It makes decisions by consensus….”
They had tried earlier in 2011,
“…But the commission could not reach consensus,”
So, March 18, 2013, they planned to try again. Pew Trusts was hosting the international gathering in Bremerhaven, Germany.
Perhaps it should be noted Hillary Clinton resigned from the Office of Secretary of State on Feb. 1, 2013. Only a month and a half later, John F’n Kerry (W.S.I.V.N.) was involved in a huge international meeting regarding ANTARCTICA and the waters around her.
And then, on election day, potentially the last day he would hold power as Secretary of State, without potentially being a lame duck, guess where he is? ANTARCTICA. Of course for another international meeting.
The 2013 press release by The Pew Trusts makes much of their activities in support of the various environmental issues regarding the Southern Ocean. Joshua Reichert, the executive VP of the Pew Charitable Trusts, makes much of global warming. I suppose they had not gotten the memo yet that people were starting to see through that and that we would soon be talking about “climate change:”
“…”The Ross Sea is one of the most pristine places left on Earth,” said Joshua Reichert, executive vice president of The Pew Charitable Trusts. “It now faces challenges, brought on in great part by the warming of the earth’s climate, that threaten to alter the fragile web of life that has endured for millennia. While we cannot prevent some of these changes from taking place, we can protect it from other types of pressures such as industrial fishing that will further exacerbate disruption….”
I wondered about this paragon, Mr Reichert, and looked for other work by him in the Pew Trusts web site. There were several stories I found, with more available at some links which I did not follow. The oldest one I saw reached back to 2006.
I noticed a list of names in the left margin. I did not know any of them…..until I saw…the name of a famous person.
We will get into that in the next part.
END PART ONE
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
This post begins the ANTARCTICA DIG REPORT, “ANTARCTICA - WHAT’S GOING ON?”
with 12 Parts. In an effort to try to fulfill the requests for two different formats, here follows the SHORT VERSION:
All of these posts can be found as replies to post seven of this thread:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3736607/posts?page=7#7
It was generally who posted the following:
“Twitter rumor:
Why did one Jeffrey Epstein’s planes fly to Antarctica on July 23rd 2019 while he was locked up? July 23rd was the day Epstein had been found semiconscious in his cell with marks on his neck...what’s in ANTARCTICA?”
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EB_ysLiWwAA_Oof?format=jpg&name=900x900
“IDK if the rumor is true, but Antarctica seems to be a focal point for a lot of people at a lot of odd times. JF’nK went there on election eve/night in 2016. The pope was there. Can’t remember right now, but a few other significant people have gone there for no apparent reason.”
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3772004/reply?c=464
Well, naturally I had to look into it.
The first thing I learned was that John F’n Kerry not only went to Antarctica - he went on ELECTION DAY 2016: NOV. 8, 2016 to be precise.
I learned that back in 2013, the PEW TRUSTS had organized an international meeting in Germany about preserving the oceans around Antarctica - and John F’n Kerry attended that, showing that he has had some interests in Antarctica for a while before his 2016 visit.
There were some other press releases from PEW TRUSTS which caught my eye. In particular I was focusing on JOSHUA REICHERT, the executive VP of the Pew Charitable Trusts. I found some papers he had written, as well as a list of names in the margin of the page listing the papers. I was unfamiliar with all but one of the names. Those papers and The Famous Name are examined in PART TWO.
END PART ONE
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
More please,
ANTARCTICA - WHAT’S GOING ON?
PART TWO - LONG
So who was at least peripherally involved with the Pew Trusts’ list of important people?
THEODORE ROOSEVELT IV.
And guess what?
He wrote a paper with Joshua S. Reichert about the “GLOBAL OCEAN LEGACY HAWAII.”
Treasure Islands
https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/about/news-room/opinion/2006/06/15/treasure-islands
OPINIONJune 15, 2006
“Global Ocean Legacy Hawaii”
https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/projects/archived-projects/global-ocean-legacy-hawaii
by Joshua S. Reichert, Theodore Roosevelt IV
“President Bush is expected to declare the northwestern Hawaiian Islands a national monument today, thereby creating the largest marine reserve on earth….”
I know this isn’t about Antarctica right now, but please bear with me. Pew seems to be a big player down there, so perhaps it isn’t wasted time to poke around them a little.
On the same page on which I found the article with co-author Teddy IV, I also found this story blurb. Without clicking on the article, I could not see any connection to either Reichert nor to Teddy IV. But it seemed interesting in light of the Uranium I scandal.
It may have nothing to do with that, but is a possible dot in our huge constellation of dots before us, which we are assured by Q need connecting:
Search Blurb:
Protect the Grand Canyon from New Uranium Mining
https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/fact-sheets/2011/11/15/protect-the-grand-canyon-from-new-uranium-mining
FACT SHEET
November 15, 2011
Campaign for Responsible Mining
https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/projects/archived-projects/campaign-for-responsible-mining
“In October of 2011, the Obama administration announced its support for a long-term ban on new mining claims on roughly 1 million acres of national forest and other public land around Grand Canyon National Park. Unfortunately, H.R. 3155 would bypass t…”
OK…. That sounds interesting. Let’s click on “Campaign for Responsible Mining” and see what might be there:
https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/projects/archived-projects/campaign-for-responsible-mining
Mining of hardrock minerals—gold, uranium and other metals—on U.S. public lands is governed by the General Mining Law of 1872. Virtually unchanged since it was signed by President Ulysses S. Grant to promote development of the West, this frontier-era statute is no match for today’s modern mining. Under the 1872 law:
Mining companies—even those that are foreign-owned—are allowed to take approximately $1 billion annually in gold and other metals from public lands without payment of a royalty.
There is scant regulation of the nation’s top-polluting industry and few resources to clean up abandoned mines. The Environmental Protection Agency has documented more than $2 billion in taxpayer spending over the past decade on mine cleanup.
Mining is given priority status, on most public lands, making it nearly impossible to prohibit or restrict it, even near national parks and other iconic places, like the Grand Canyon.
The Pew Campaign for Responsible Mining is a national effort to educate and encourage the public and policy makers to adopt a modern framework for mining in the West. Today:
Taxpayers lose a conservatively estimated $100 million a year because, unlike with the coal, oil and gas industries, mining companies can extract valuable resources from public land essentially for free.
[Well, yeah, I can get behind that point.]
Taxpayers face a multi-billion dollar mining cleanup bill. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, the mining industry releases more toxic pollution than any other.
Federal agencies give hardrock mining on public lands priority status over other uses. It remains nearly impossible to restrict mining near national parks. Important water sources, wildlife and local communities are also vulnerable.
[Yes….And yet there are ways to make mining and other mineral extractions environmentally safe and clean. A balancing act always ensues when there is mining. Miners / mineral extractors are not all bad guys. Here in Oklahoma, there are a lot of oil fields and coal mining sites which the companies are careful to clean up and reclaim.]
The law allows claimholders to buy public land for $5 an acre or less, and to use it for anything from condominiums to casinos. Congress has temporarily halted the practice.
[Interesting, I did not know that. IMHO that statement would need to be verified.]
Worse yet, a new rush is on in the West. In recent years, mining claims for uranium, gold and other metals on public lands have increased dramatically. Many of these new claims lie near treasured national lands, as well as highly populated urban areas and tribal lands.
[Hmmmm wonder if it is possible Hillary/U-1 fits in here somewhere?]
It’s time to reform the 1872 Mining Law and reclaim our public lands for future generations.
[Maybe…. But not in a derpish way.]
OK let’s look at that other link associated with this story:
Protect the Grand Canyon from New Uranium Mining
FACT SHEET
November 15, 2011
[Here is an excerpt, and the reason it shows up in the search is because it has a reference to Teddy IV’s presidential forebear.]
Oppose H.R. 3155, the “Northern Arizona Mining Continuity Act of 2011”
“In October of 2011, the Obama administration announced its support for a long-term ban on new mining claims on roughly 1 million acres of national forest and other public land around Grand Canyon National Park. The move, following more than two years of study, came after Interior Secretary Ken Salazar issued a temporary halt to claimstaking in response to the skyrocketing number of new claims, mostly for uranium, around the park. The administration’s decision would apply a 20-year moratorium under the Federal Land Policy and Management Act, an authority that has been used to protect other places from new mining claims, including Yellowstone National Park and Oregon’s Coos Bay.
Unfortunately, H.R. 3155 would bypass this process and ensure that every one of this million acres around the Grand Canyon remains open to new uranium mining.”
“The one great sight which every American should see.”
President Theodore Roosevelt
“The Obama administration’s action to protect the Grand Canyon applies only to future claims; current mining and existing valid claims are not affected. In fact, several uranium mines are operating now, and the Interior Department predicts that another seven may be developed, even with the administration’s moratorium.
Without the 20-year “withdrawal,” however, at least 30 mines and more than 725 exploration projects are predicted, potentially transforming an irreplaceable natural treasure into an industrialized mining region….”
Well now, isn’t that interesting? Could it be that the Obama Admin did a feel good regulation, and then put a tooth puller in it….which dedicatedly religious environmentalists would find objectionable?
Hmmmmmm. I’m wondering just exactly what IS Pew Trusts? Do they actually care about the environment?
In addition to the amazing sea life around Antarctica, the southern continent there also has amazing mineral resources. To back up that assertion, here is a duckduckgo search blurb on that:
https://www.azomining.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=239
Antarctica: Mining, Minerals and Fuel Resources
“With mineral and fuel resources depleting in other parts of the world, China and Russia have expressed their interest in exploring the region for minerals and fuel. Without this ban on mining, most mining experts agree that Antarctica is a very inhospitable and expensive place to conduct any mining related activities.”
So who REALLY is Pew Trusts? Are they only involved in environmental issues?
We will explore that a bit in the next post.
END PART TWO L
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
:-D It’s coming! LOL!
ANTARCTICA - WHAT’S GOING ON?
PART TWO - SHORT
[I really DID shorten it a bit, but it is kinda long for a “short.” Oh well. ]
The famous name was Theodore Roosevelt IV. He wrote a paper with Joshua Reichert, the executive VP of the PEW CHARITABLE TRUSTS. It was about the oceans surrounding Hawii.
Treasure Islands
https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/about/news-room/opinion/2006/06/15/treasure-islands
OPINIONJune 15, 2006
“Global Ocean Legacy Hawaii”
https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/projects/archived-projects/global-ocean-legacy-hawaii
by Joshua S. Reichert, Theodore Roosevelt IV
This isn’t Antarctica, but because the Pew Charitable Trusts have a lot to do with Antarctica, it might be useful to detour a little bit to see what Pew is up to.
On the same page on which I found the article with co-author Teddy IV, I also found this story blurb. Without clicking on the article, I could not see any connection to either Reichert nor to Teddy IV. But it seemed interesting in light of the Uranium I scandal.
Search Blurb:
Protect the Grand Canyon from New Uranium Mining
https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/fact-sheets/2011/11/15/protect-the-grand-canyon-from-new-uranium-mining
AND
FACT SHEET
November 15, 2011
Campaign for Responsible Mining
https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/projects/archived-projects/campaign-for-responsible-mining
“In October of 2011, the Obama administration announced its support for a long-term ban on new mining claims on roughly 1 million acres of national forest and other public land around Grand Canyon National Park. Unfortunately, H.R. 3155 would bypass t…”
OK…. That sounds interesting. Let’s click on “Campaign for Responsible Mining” and see what might be there:
https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/projects/archived-projects/campaign-for-responsible-mining
Mining of hardrock minerals—gold, uranium and other metals—on U.S. public lands is governed by the General Mining Law of 1872. Virtually unchanged since it was signed by President Ulysses S. Grant to promote development of the West, this frontier-era statute is no match for today’s modern mining. Under the 1872 law: [the laws are cited at the link]
We learn that:
The Pew Campaign for Responsible Mining is a national effort to educate and encourage the public and policy makers to adopt a modern framework for mining in the West.
PEW Trusts points out some areas of concern with mining that are a detriment to the environment and to the tax payers.
URANIUM and other metals and the increase in claims on public lands, with concerns about those enumerated. I was wondering if/how Hillary and U-1 might fit in here. Reichert was advocating for changes to the 1872 mining laws.
The following link was examined:
Protect the Grand Canyon from New Uranium Mining
FACT SHEET
November 15, 2011
[Here is an excerpt, and the reason it shows up in the search is because it has a reference to Teddy IV’s presidential forebear.]
Oppose H.R. 3155, the “Northern Arizona Mining Continuity Act of 2011”
“In October of 2011, the Obama administration announced its support for a long-term ban on new mining claims on roughly 1 million acres of national forest and other public land around Grand Canyon National Park. The move, following more than two years of study, came after Interior Secretary Ken Salazar issued a temporary halt to claimstaking in response to the skyrocketing number of new claims, mostly for uranium, around the park. The administration’s decision would apply a 20-year moratorium under the Federal Land Policy and Management Act, an authority that has been used to protect other places from new mining claims, including Yellowstone National Park and Oregon’s Coos Bay.
Unfortunately, H.R. 3155 would bypass this process and ensure that every one of this million acres around the Grand Canyon remains open to new uranium mining.”
“The one great sight which every American should see.”
President Theodore Roosevelt
“The Obama administration’s action to protect the Grand Canyon applies only to future claims; current mining and existing valid claims are not affected. In fact, several uranium mines are operating now, and the Interior Department predicts that another seven may be developed, even with the administration’s moratorium.
Without the 20-year “withdrawal,” however, at least 30 mines and more than 725 exploration projects are predicted, potentially transforming an irreplaceable natural treasure into an industrialized mining region….”
Well now, isn’t that interesting? Could it be that the Obama Admin did a feel good regulation, and then put a tooth puller in it….which dedicatedly religious environmentalists would find objectionable?
Hmmmmmm. I’m wondering just exactly what IS Pew Trusts? Do they actually care about the environment?
END PART TWO S
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
ANTARCTICA - WHAT’S GOING ON?
PART THREE LONG
I found it difficult to find good unbiased info at the Pew Trusts web site, so I went to Mr. Wiki and his completely unbiased Pedia: </sarc
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pew_Charitable_Trusts
It is really quite interesting.
“The Pew Charitable Trusts is an independent non-profit, non-governmental organization (NGO), founded in 1948.
With over US $6 billion in assets, its stated mission is to serve the public interest by “improving public policy, informing the public, and stimulating civic life.”
“The Trusts, a single entity, is the successor to, and sole beneficiary of, seven charitable funds established between 1948 and 1979 by J. Howard Pew, Mary Ethel Pew, Joseph N. Pew, Jr., and Mabel Pew Myrin — the adult sons and daughters of Sun Oil Company founder Joseph N. Pew and his wife, Mary Anderson Pew. Honoring their parents’ religious conviction that good works should be done quietly, the original Pew Memorial Foundation was a grantmaking organization that made donations anonymously. The foundation became the Pew Memorial Trust in 1956, based in Philadelphia, the donors’ hometown.…”
“Although today The Pew Charitable Trusts is non-partisan and non-ideological, Joseph Pew and his heirs were politically conservative. The modern day organization works to ENCOURAGE RESPONSIVE GOVERNMENT AND SUPPORT SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ON A WIDE RANGE OF ISSUES, INCLUDING GLOBAL OCEAN GOVERNANCE, CORRECTION REFORM, AND ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE.”
[Well, that is scary and sounds derpetoid to me.]
“Early priorities of the Pew Memorial Trust included cancer research, the ***American Red Cross,*** “
[YIKES!!!!]
“and a pioneering project to assist historically black colleges. Later beneficiaries included conservative organizations such as the JOHN BIRCH SOCIETY, THE AMERICAN LIBERTY LEAGUE, AND THE AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE, as well as environmental organizations such as the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Oceana, and MAINSTREAM THINK TANKS LIKE THE CENTER-LEFT BROOKINGS INSTITUTION. The Trusts continues to fund charities in Philadelphia.”
[[I had not heard of the American Liberty League, so here is the first paragraph from Mr Wik on THAT subjecti:
“The American Liberty League was an American political organization formed in 1934, primarily of wealthy business elites and prominent political figures, who were conservatives opposed to the New Deal of President The American Liberty League was an American political organization formed in 1934, primarily of wealthy business elites and prominent political figures, who were conservatives opposed to the New Deal of President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Its principles emphasized private property and individual liberties. Its leader Jouett Shouse called on members to:
‘defend and uphold the constitution of the United States ... to teach the necessity of respect for the rights of persons and property as fundamental to every successful form of government ... teach the duty of government to encourage and protect individual and group initiative and enterprise, to foster the right to work, earn, save, and acquire property, and to preserve the ownership and lawful use of property when acquired. Its principles emphasized private property and individual liberties.’
It was highly active in spreading its message for two years. Following the landslide re-election of Roosevelt in 1936, it sharply reduced its activities. It disbanded entirely in 1940.” ]]
We are most of us here familiar with the “mainstream... center-left Brookings Institute.” I also think most of here don’t see that as very “center” left, but full on left.
OK, so here where I am with all this right now about Pew Trusts…. (And I suspect our FReeQs will see lots of things I miss. )
Provisionally, I think it is possible they really do care about the environment at some level. However, I do think all issues coming from the derps regarding the issue are tainted with the “sustainable” and controlling aspects of what they say it takes to keep the environment protected.
I think a case can be made that there have been some patriots involved in the Pew organization founders, and perhaps some, especially more recent generations, have been duped by believing the PR rhetoric of such things they have supported as the RED CROSS. They have also supported the JOHN BIRCH SOCIETY…but we have learned that at that $6 billions mark, the likelihood, as we are so unfortunately learning, most of the big money guys are eventually turned to the Derp Side.
We also see ROOSEVELT’S OFFSPRING OF a few generations removed, being involved with the Pew Trusts efforts at ocean management. Time changes everything, because the founders of the Trusts were apparently not very much in favor of President Roosevelt’s policies.
And here is another little factoid about Pew Trusts.
The Pew Trusts is the mother organization for the very well known Pew public opinion polls, at Pew Research Center. As I understand it, it is one of the more reputable polls out there…. But they do indicate that they are for “IMPROVING PUBLIC POLICY.”
I have not studied the various polls, but I am now wondering if the Pew polls and surveys are as honest as they seem, or do they indulge in their own fancies when it suits them to “improve public policy, inform the public, and stimulate civic life.”
Well, you and I both know that their statement can mean a lot of things. And we also need to bear in mind Pew Trusts do have their eyes on a lot of things….including Antarctica.
Now, let’s get back to ANTARCTICA and see if we can learn anything about who... and why are prominent people going there. And there may be a detour along the way…
END PART THREE L
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
ANTARCTICA - WHAT’S GOING ON?
PART THREE SHORT
More about the PEW TRUSTS.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pew_Charitable_Trusts
“The Pew Charitable Trusts is an independent non-profit, non-governmental organization (NGO), founded in 1948.
With over US $6 billion in assets, its stated mission is to serve the public interest by “improving public policy, informing the public, and stimulating civic life.”
The Trusts, a single entity, is the successor to, and sole beneficiary of, seven charitable funds established between 1948 and 1979 by J. Howard Pew, Mary Ethel Pew, Joseph N. Pew, Jr., and Mabel Pew Myrin — the adult sons and daughters of Sun Oil Company founder Joseph N. Pew and his wife, Mary Anderson Pew. Honoring their parents’ religious conviction that good works should be done quietly, the original Pew Memorial Foundation was a grantmaking organization that made donations anonymously. The foundation became the Pew Memorial Trust in 1956, based in Philadelphia, the donors’ hometown.…”
“Although today The Pew Charitable Trusts is non-partisan and non-ideological, Joseph Pew and his heirs were politically conservative. THE MODERN DAY ORGANIZATION WORKS TO ENCOURAGE RESPONSIVE GOVERNMENT AND SUPPORT SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ON A WIDE RANGE OF ISSUES, INCLUDING GLOBAL OCEAN GOVERNANCE, CORRECTION REFORM, AND ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE.”
Early priorities of the Pew Memorial Trust included cancer research, the ***American Red Cross,*** “
[YIKES!!!!]
“and a pioneering project to assist historically black colleges. Later beneficiaries included conservative organizations such as the JOHN BIRCH SOCIETY, THE AMERICAN LIBERTY LEAGUE, AND THE AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE, as well as environmental organizations such as the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Oceana, and MAINSTREAM THINK TANKS LIKE THE CENTER-LEFT BROOKINGS INSTITUTION. The Trusts continues to fund charities in Philadelphia.”
[[[[I had not heard of the American Liberty League, so here is the first paragraph from Mr Wik on THAT subjecti:
“The American Liberty League was an American political organization formed in 1934, primarily of wealthy business elites and prominent political figures, who were conservatives opposed to the New Deal of President The American Liberty League was an American political organization formed in 1934, primarily of wealthy business elites and prominent political figures, who were conservatives opposed to the New Deal of President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Its principles emphasized private property and individual liberties. Its leader Jouett Shouse called on members to:
‘defend and uphold the constitution of the United States ... to teach the necessity of respect for the rights of persons and property as fundamental to every successful form of government ... teach the duty of government to encourage and protect individual and group initiative and enterprise, to foster the right to work, earn, save, and acquire property, and to preserve the ownership and lawful use of property when acquired. Its principles emphasized private property and individual liberties.’
It was highly active in spreading its message for two years. Following the landslide re-election of Roosevelt in 1936, it sharply reduced its activities. It disbanded entirely in 1940.” ]]]]]
[A little more discussion of the above beneficiaries is in the LONG version.]
Texokie speculations about the TRUSTS:
I think a case can be made that there have been some patriots involved in the Pew organization founders, and perhaps some, especially more recent generations, have been duped by believing the PR rhetoric of such things they have supported as the RED CROSS. They have also supported the JOHN BIRCH SOCIETY…but we have learned that at that $6 billions mark, the likelihood, as we are so unfortunately learning, most of the big money guys are eventually turned to the Derp Side.
We also see Roosevelt’s offspring of a few generations removed, being involved with the Pew Trusts efforts at ocean management. Time changes everything, because the founders of the Trusts were apparently not very much in favor of President Roosevelt’s policies.
And here is another little factoid about Pew Trusts.
The Pew Trusts is the mother organization for the very well known Pew public opinion polls, at Pew Research Center. As I understand it, it is one of the more reputable polls out there…. But they do indicate that they are for “IMPROVING PUBLIC POLICY.” I have not studied the various polls, but I am now wondering if the Pew polls and surveys are as honest as they seem, or do they indulge in their own fancies when it suits them to “IMPROVE PUBLIC POLICY, INFORM THE PUBLIC, AND STIMULATE CIVIC LIFE.”
Well, you and I both know that can mean a lot of things. And we also need to bear in mind Pew Trusts do have their eyes on a lot of things….including Antarctica.
END PART THREE S
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
Do you mean to be posting these on a retired thread, TEXOKIE ?
Do you mean to be posting these on a retired thread, TEXOKIE ?
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Yes. I am posting them there and will then transfer the links to the current thread. More coming with explanations.
Cool! Post on.
I have begun posting the ANTARCTICA DIG REPORT on a retired thread. Some of you FReeQs, (from whom nothing can be hidden!) have twigged onto that.
My plan is to post the articles on the retired thread so as to not put inordinate walls of text on the current thread. I am doing this at the suggestion of our Mother of Dragons, ransomnote.
The plan is to try to fulfill the expressed desire of FReeQs for my content in two different modes by posting them to the retired thread, pick up the links, and post the links to the current thread - in this case probably the NEXT thread, because we are now (I suspect) in FESTIVAL for this thread.
It is my request, and also (likely) of ransomnote too, to:
PLEASE DO NOT POST RESPONSES TO THE RETIRED THREAD!
I know this is awkward, but we are trying, as I said before, to take care of two kinds of FReeQy needs! Some want the full leaded Great Walls of Text, and others have expressed a desire for the shorter versions. I have sought to achieve that AWAY from the current thread.
Please note that I am unable to link to the posts without actually posting them! ransomnote suggested the retired thread option....but we DO NOT WANT TO RESURRECT THE RETIRED THREAD FOR DISCUSSION!!!
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR PATIENCE - AND FOR THE INTEREST AND HONOR YOU HAVE SHOWN ME FOR WANTING TO SEE THE CONTENT I PUT TOGETHER!
Unless the New Thread Beginner People create a new thread, I will shortly be posting links to the first three of the twelve part series, despite this being FESTIVAL, since the interest seems to be high to see the Antarctica report.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
