Skip to comments.Pelosi Triggered as Trump Issues First Veto Over National Emergency
Posted on 03/17/2019 10:14:39 AM PDT by McQ444
President Donald Trump signed his first veto Friday as he took action to block moves designed to sabotage his national emergency declaration on border security.As promised, President Trump saved his declaration against a resolution passed by the House and Senate to end the emergency at the US Southern Border.The move against the emergency was intended to halt construction of the long-promised border wall and twelve Senate Republicans sided with Democrats on the issue.
(Excerpt) Read more at nnettle.com ...
While subverting/ undermining America and our core values is the major theme of todays soroznazi- controlled DNC party central machine, theyve still made a tactical mistake criticizing pdjt for trying to defend our borders. This is the primary responsibility of a president and therefore the area of greatest presidential authority. Not only is the president duty- bound Constitutionslly to defend America as our commander in chief but congress ( before soroznazis big subversion moves, of course) has specifically authorized it ( not that a president even needs any statutory authorization or approvals to defend the country). Theres no perceptible acrnerio whereby the soroznazi- funded- traitors or anyone else could stop a president in this particular arena
“....and 12 Senate RINOs joined with the democRATS....”
Send the next caravan to her house.
The demonic Botoxian has spoken!!!!
Trigger was Roy Roger’s horse, a fitting ride for the “King of the Cowboys”, and the “Smartest Horse in the World”.
How did that get tied to the ignorant reactions of snowflakes?
Praying she sees Jesus forthwith.
Scary looking creature!
I doubt Pelosi’s triggered in the least bit......both parties are well aware of what the other is up to and as well the plays possible. She knew this was coming as everybody did long ago..
Will Nancy visit the Pope ? LOL
Truman had 250, Ike 181.... then they started going away... 44 for GHWBush (in 4 years), 37 for Clinton (8 years... averaging 4.6/yr), 12 for GWBush (8 years... 1.5/yr), 12 for Obama (8 years... 1.5/yr), and now 1 in 2 years (0.5/yr) for Trump the Tyrant (according to the MSM).
You have to go back to the 1800s for Garfield to find a president with zero.
She’s ALWAYS triggered by something.
And yes, Border Patrol should escort the next caravan to HER walled compound, and SHE can put them up on her dime and her property.
We’ll see how “compassionate” and “for the people” she is then.
(You have to go back to 1825-1829, John Quincy Adams, to find a full term President with zero vetoes.)
I saw an interesting comment somewhere on Friday that I’ve not seen explored further elsewhere but would seem to make sense legally. If/as so then Nancy stepped out of line and this whole thing in sequence + context is amazing.
There are two aspects of an EO - in this case the national emergency. There’s the declaration designating who can + will do what. Then there’s the implementation actually then executed upon such designation. These are two separate events with accompanying distinctions in legal realm.
POTUS issued the declaration but it was NEVER acted upon until Friday afternoon when Barr officially executed the order on Friday 3/15 at 3:24 PM.
The nuance of the National Emergencies Act and whatever legislation has since followed is unknown (to me at least) and even if/as so, it’s going to be up to the SCOTUS to ultimately settle this - as a PROCESS issue.
1. POTUS issues national emergency.
2. House votes to deny.
3. Senate affirms (thanks RINO-12)
4. POTUS vetoes.
5. Barr signs & executes order implementing national emergency.
SHOULDN’T #5 be #2 ???!?!?!?!??!?!
Until #5 happened it would seem any action is moot except to the degrees that a Sense of Congress is issued.
Otherwise it’s another nail in the coffin for Pelosi to fight legally using the weight of the House.
BUILD THE WALL! :)
those 12 RINO- Quislings we MUST replace ASAP!
they voted against a president/commander in chief
trying to defend our very borders, and to do it in the most humanitarian method possible...
OF ALL THINGS TO VOTE AGAINST!?
unimaginable just how traitorous those 12 are!
they must be replaced!
I have a different take on this...
What if the Senate voted for the POTUS and therefore was at odds with the House? The whole issue would still be unresolved and Trump still would not have the funding.
HOWEVER- by voting the way the Republicans did and siding with the House, Trump could now veto the bill...and get his wall...
Back room politics on the part of the Senate Republicans? Could be....I'm just sayin'.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.