Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

City sold property for $1. Now it wants to rent it back for $27M
the star ledger of newark ^ | 02.20.19 | Karen Yi

Posted on 03/13/2019 2:43:19 PM PDT by Coleus

Less than two years after Newark sold a piece of property for $1 to its parking authority, city officials are pushing a deal to lease it back.

The total cost for the city: More than $27 million over 30 years.

The Newark Parking Authority plans to develop the land on 43-67 Green Street into a five-story parking deck with administrative offices and retail space. The city would then rent storage space for its municipal court, relocate its finance department there and get 258 parking spots for use during business hours.

But the proposal is befuddling some members of the city council, who say Newark should have kept the prime real estate and developed it on its own. The lot, currently providing parking for city employees, is steps from City Hall and the Prudential Center.

“This was land that we transferred to the parking authority for a dollar and now we are paying the parking authority at $27-a-square-foot a year to rent the building that we could have constructed ourselves and maybe rented space to them,” At-Large Councilman Carlos Gonzalez said at a recent council meeting. “I don’t know why we’re doing it.”

Lawrence Crump, general counsel for the parking authority, did not respond to multiple emails and messages from NJ Advance Media. But, during a council meeting he said the deal offered Newark new offices without the obligation of repaying bonds they would have needed to take to build the structure.

“What this does is allow the city to have the space without the burden of paying back that money,” he said. The lease payments are less than what the city would pay to finance the project, Crump said.

(Excerpt) Read more at nj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy; Local News; Society
KEYWORDS: newark; nj; oldnews; parkinggarage
I smell a rat. Where is booker to the rescue?
1 posted on 03/13/2019 2:43:19 PM PDT by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Coleus

I suspect this is the same town that elected Spartacus as mayor.......


2 posted on 03/13/2019 2:46:24 PM PDT by patriot torch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

$105K for a part-time job. City council members just gave themselves big raises.

Newark’s City Council agreed to increase their own salaries by more than $30,000 on Tuesday, after voting last month to give the mayor a $50,000 raise.

The measures cap off a series of recent pay boosts for the mayor, his aides and other city administrators.
Council President Mildred Crump will earn $105,000, a 48 percent increase from her $71,000 salary. The other eight members of the council will earn $95,000, up from $64,000.

https://www.nj.com/essex/2019/03/105k-for-a-part-time-job-city-council-members-just-gave-themselves-big-raises.html


3 posted on 03/13/2019 2:47:40 PM PDT by SMGFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Be interesting to investigate the financial ties and arrangements of the Newark Parking Authority.

Of course that won’t be happnin’


4 posted on 03/13/2019 2:49:19 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

These type of tax-money-laundering & kickback schemes have become SOP in local politics.
Taxpayers have surrendered their rights & their power.
IT’S OUR MONEY. ANY taxpayer has the right to challenge this crap. All this stuff is PUBLIC RECORD. We can access it & sue to stop it.


5 posted on 03/13/2019 2:50:13 PM PDT by mumblypeg (I've seen the future, brother. It is murder. --L. Cohen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mumblypeg

Question: If you are a resident of this municipality, why aren’t you and your like-minded colleagues suing?


6 posted on 03/13/2019 3:03:05 PM PDT by erkelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
“I don’t know why we’re doing it.”

I am fairly sure I can gue$$...

7 posted on 03/13/2019 3:06:34 PM PDT by Bitman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

The lease payments are less than what the city would pay to finance the project,

How is that possible?


8 posted on 03/13/2019 3:06:50 PM PDT by DariusBane (Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept? Vive Deo et Vives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

I smell kickbacks.


9 posted on 03/13/2019 3:12:27 PM PDT by Old Yeller (Auto-correct has become my worst enema.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Jersey is loco.


10 posted on 03/13/2019 3:19:33 PM PDT by waterhill (I Shall Remain, in spite of __________.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: erkelly

I’m not a resident of that particular municipality.
However, I & my neighbors have already stopped one taxpayer boondoggle, & are in process of stopping a second.
FWIW, we didnt actually need to sue in the 1st instance. The crooks (mayor’s cronies) dropped their plans & hightailed out of town when we examined public records & publicized their shenanigans. In 2nd case, so far $250k already blown before taxpayers knew of plans, but we’ve frozen them in their tracks & they’re unlikely to proceed. We may need to sue to get the taxpayer funds returned.
The issue us our local council keeps raising our taxes & fees while diverting that tax money into private pockets; meanwhile, our streets & water system falling apart. We want it to stop & taxes be used for intended purposes.
MAGA needs to happen at the local level. It can be done.


11 posted on 03/13/2019 3:43:03 PM PDT by mumblypeg (I've seen the future, brother. It is murder. --L. Cohen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All

This stinks like a dead skunk in the middle of the road.


12 posted on 03/13/2019 4:03:23 PM PDT by Retvet (Retvet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

“befuddling”

Not when you realize the goal is to increase spending.


13 posted on 03/13/2019 4:04:20 PM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Yes they want to rent it back but only after hundreds of million of dollars in improvement have been made. This has the smell of a good business deal.


14 posted on 03/13/2019 4:44:49 PM PDT by dirtymac (Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country! Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson