“Plaintiff States collectively stand to lose millions in federal funding that their national guard units receive for domestic drug interdiction and counter-drug activities, and millions of dollars received on an annual basis for law enforcement programs from the Treasury Forfeiture Fund, harming the public safety of Plaintiff States.”
I believe their argument is moot. The wall
is being built to address and support
the stated concerns. I’m curious to know
if any of the states objecting have
placed national guard troops on the
border.
Plaintiff States collectively stand to lose millions in federal funding that their national guard units receive for domestic drug interdiction and counter-drug activities, and millions of dollars received on an annual basis for law enforcement programs from the Treasury Forfeiture Fund, harming the public safety of Plaintiff States.
I believe their argument is moot. The wall
is being built to address and support
the stated concerns.
BRILLIENT REASONING! You get an A+