Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Lean-Right

“Plaintiff States collectively stand to lose millions in federal funding that their national guard units receive for domestic drug interdiction and counter-drug activities, and millions of dollars received on an annual basis for law enforcement programs from the Treasury Forfeiture Fund, harming the public safety of Plaintiff States.”

I believe their argument is moot. The wall
is being built to address and support
the stated concerns.

BRILLIENT REASONING! You get an A+


11 posted on 02/27/2019 1:58:01 PM PST by street_lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: street_lawyer

“Plaintiff States collectively stand to lose millions in federal funding that their national guard units receive for domestic drug interdiction and counter-drug activities, and millions of dollars received on an annual basis for law enforcement programs from the Treasury Forfeiture Fund, harming the public safety of Plaintiff States.”

I believe their argument is moot. The wall
is being built to address and support
the stated concerns.

BRILLIENT REASONING! You get an A+
it’s also Brilliant as well lol


12 posted on 02/27/2019 1:59:18 PM PST by street_lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: street_lawyer

There’s one other point to make.
Trump has already declared a national
emergency on the opioid epidemic.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/opioids/
For the rats to claim that moving money
from the military defense budgets creates
a hardship on the enforcement of drug
interdiction, it is not true. The money
is there for the opioid emergency declaration.
I believe it’s funded thru the dept of health.


15 posted on 02/27/2019 10:38:12 PM PST by Lean-Right (Eat More Moose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson