Posted on 12/10/2018 10:18:07 PM PST by ransomnote
That article was posted on FR front page ... Very topical ;)
mark
>> Time’s “person of the year”
It may turn out to be a great choice, but not in the way they intended.
It will call attention to the fake news, eventually to the real story behind this, and to how self-centered and navel-gazing the media are. Most normal people are not this obsessed with journalists and journalism. Most of us could think of dozens, probably hundreds, of people we think are more noteworthy this year.
I would pick Q. :-)
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I don’t get out much.... who IS the “TIME’S PERSON OF THE YEAR”????
The missing letters / word is “age” ... What are we to glean?
Google CEO, leftist d-bag ;)
“”I’m holding the opinion that the next CoS will be military, Colonel or higher.
All non-MIL names are chaff.””
I wouldn’t rule out Mark Meadows. His standing in the Freedom Caucus makes me think he’s already party of the Q team.
Read this Q post from yesterday bottom to top;
POTUS
NSA
UNITED STATES MILITARY (G)
THE FREEDOM CAUCUS (EST)
FOREIGN & DOMESTIC PATRIOTS
2015
THE FIGHT TO SAVE THE WORLD
Q
Would this mean that members of the Freedom Caucus were part of the “design” to elect Trump and prosecute the “swamp”?
Trump was the final piece of the puzzle.
Meadows as COS would make sense, imo. He’s already involved and knows what needs to be done.
“””That article was posted on FR front page ... Very topical ;)”””
Whut?
Excerpts from ABC article Q2583:
“Some experts say placing respected civilians on the Bush terror tribunals, such as retired U.S. generals, or former secretaries of defense or attorneys general, would go a long way toward shoring up international support for such commissions. “”
“The Bush team is also reportedly looking at rules of procedure drawn up for Korean War-era military commissions that never took place. “
“The Bush Nov. 13 order establishing such commissions has already said the tribunals might not carry the “reasonable doubt” burden of proof or other principles generally recognized in U.S. civilian courts. “
https://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92098&page=1
Q posts for context?
Kelly gonna be too busy for CoS???
Bad sleep. Busy. Heard Q Drop. Post 2583. I lurk moar now. In/out.
I saw that, too but the article is dated yesterday. I’m guessing it was about Bush and it set up the very question that Graham asked Kavanaugh. Old news that’s vital for current events? We’re still at war and the Clinton/Obama administration DID collude with the enemy. Treason!
you sure ?
Brilliant! With cameras running he had Pelosi and Schumer begin a debate over The Wall and we see how nasty these two are--especially Schumer. ("Elections have consequences, Mr. President.")
Boy! Did these two hate having to speak in front of the press. I hope the public sees this.
My intuition is screaming...It looks to me like they had to go back and retrieve the documents. Did the derps taint the chain of custody in attempt to disallow all the WB’s evidence? Was this the counter? Future will prove past.
It’s clear from the Q drop that the document collection was solely to preserve chain of custody and protect the whistle blower. And inferring that the derps wanted to get the documents and likely harm the WB.
It’s clear from the Q drop that the document collection was solely to preserve chain of custody and protect the whistle blower. And inferring that the derps wanted to get the documents and likely harm the WB.
******************************************
And with the docs gotten there’s no upside to killing the WB anymore.
Posting blind....
I was reading the article in The Hill referenced in in Q# 2582.
“...17-minute exchange...”
I’m sure I’m among a veritable chorus of FReeQs noting that.... but it IS cool, is it not???
as long as they aren’t regular civilians that would pull an OJ...
Posting blind....
I was reading the article in The Hill referenced in in Q# 2582.
“...17-minute exchange...”
I’m sure I’m among a veritable chorus of FReeQs noting that.... but it IS cool, is it not???
who IS the “TIME’S PERSON OF THE YEAR”????
It seems to be 4 people, all journalists. But I think the main one is Khashoggi. This, IMO, is going to backfire on them.
P.s. I was the Time magazine “Person of the Year” in 2006.
I really should add that to my resume.
Live links for 2584:
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/mark-levin-a-time-for-truth
https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/briefing/Senate_Impeachment_Role.htm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.