Posted on 11/10/2018 9:04:20 AM PST by freedomjusticeruleoflaw
I love it how Freepers are so sure that they know how to avoid be punked. Your assumption, that I and others who casually follow Q are easily fooled, ignores some simple truths.
1. Sometimes the world is round, not flat. (get it?)
2. Information is always good.
3. Discernment is always good.
4. Censorship is always bad.
5. Q is not the issue here. The issue is deplatforming.
Except for .... Q did say that the Q posts would be used for disinformation from time to time.
You may very well be right, BUT, he has the right to say what he thinks. YOUTUBE does NOT have the right to censor IMHO.
I subscribed to his channel on BOTH YOUTUBE and VIMEO.
My feelings exactly. I am amused and intrigued by all the Q stuff, but I do not wait with bated breath for every Q post. But, just like the religious, Q anons have a right to talk about what they believe. Efforts to ban it make me wonder if there might be something to it.
I any event, banning will hasten the development of alternative platforms. They more they tighten their grip, the more blogs will slip through their fingers. :-) (My new tagline!)
I do not want to regulate their social media. I want to develop alternatives so that people don’t even go on their websites. For anything.
Nonsequiter
Spelling aside... Let me help you. How come Twitter wasn’t deplatformed?
I guess you think I frequent Infowars. Do you understand how many people would consider Free Republic to be no different than Infowars? Divide and conquer. Internecine wars make us weak. And one more time for the learning disabled...
This is about deplatforming, not Q.
Meh...you-tubers get strikes for all sorts of reasons.
They could of flagged this guy for any number of things, including content he did years ago.
Until there’s more evidence I’d mark this down as a self imposed exile, rather than an attempt to de-platform.
Also waiting for all the other channels in on the scam to get notices.
Let me help you.
Your initial post referred to a "NON bomber" on Gab. Your "NON bomber" was not on Gab. The synagogue murderer was. I think I'm being clear here. You seem to be having difficulty expressing yourself clearly and unambiguously. But that's ok. I've seen enough.
Semantics... which are evidently your intellectual Easter basket.
You keep arguing Q, when I keep arguing deplatforming.
I watched and read the first appearances of “microchip” and his claims on reddit about being part of Q. I also saw his claims and his total inability to sustain his claims of expertise and even knowledge about Q and Q’s postings by experts in each. He is outed as a non-expert in the programming he claimed, dancing around the subject trying to explain away even basic simple errors he posted in his claims, posted faked videos of his "logs" as recorded on his iPhone, on which he claimed he did the Q posting. But, that actually is not possible as iOS defaults excess spaces down to just two spaces and Q frequently used multiple blank spaces in Q drops. Those would not have been uploaded from an iOS device as anything EXCEPT double spaces. In addition, his faked logs all showed the same time stamp on screen, 9:41, the same time stamp Apple uses on their sample iOS device images on Apple.com . . . every single one of the logs showing him making specific Q entries in the past had that time stamp regardless of the time stamp of the Q posting.
In addition, his "logs" did not take into account that the Q drops had been edited and changed since their original posting, which "microchip" seemed to be totally unaware Q had done and his log did not match what he claimed.
Finally, as microchip’s ultimate proof, he asserted that Q was going to no longer be posting any more drops since he was now "outed." The next day, Q was posting again after a ten day hiatus. The Microchip story re-appeared after a twenty-three day hiatus, with his proponents citing the same cessation as proof. . . and the very next day, Q restarted posting.
So, in other words, microchip was outed as not possessing his claimed programming expertise, posting faked proofs of "historical logs" showing him posting Q drops, and those logs did not match the original drops. I.e. microchip is the hoaxer.
Yeah, I saw all of that. But obviously you have me beat when it comes to Q info. I only knew that a few days after the article was posted here, to the delight of unthinking hordes, I was quickly learning that Q had not been debunked at all. Suffice it say that the OAN(?) video had done its job, which was to offer cover for every Freeper who was to lazy to watch a few Q proof videos. The lie makes it half way around the world before the truth can get its boots on.
Yup!
It is absolutely critical that this cult that brainwashes people to think and research for themselves be stopped before it gets out of hand!
;-)
There is no reason for anyone to have the anger or personal animus Q provokes on here. That alone should make normies interested, even if Q hadn’t posted exactly 30 days, to the minute listed on John McCain’s death certificate, that McCain would be in the news in a month. Or that Q correctly predicted McCain would die on National Dog Day, a month and a half before he died - on national dog day.
David Ickes has been around forever saying there is a secret cabal of reptilian shapeshifters that runs everything in the world, and they are actually dinosaurs who evolved technological advancement 60 million years ago, and now they use hologram technology to look like us and hide as they rule things from behind the scenes. You will even see people crop up who swear this famous guy or that famous guy shapeshifted in front of them into a scaled lizard.
Nobody on here gets emotional about Ickes assertions, or the fact there is a contingent around who will tell you it is true. I could post it here as if I believe it, and I am pretty sure people would poke fun at me, but not get as personal about it. So I don’t buy they are morally concerned about the spread of disinformation. And if you look on youtube you will see no end of videos purported to show various celebs shapeshifting into lizard people when their 60 million year old holographers begin to break down. Nobody gets banned at youtube over that, even though those videos violate copyrights and insult the famous people they portray as evil.
The emotion over Q makes it feel as if the big secret in plain sight about Q, is that his fervent opposition is so prolific on every board online - and always has been, even before Q.
It feels like these people are not so emotional about him because they are so concerned that everyone believe truth. It feels personal.
And that makes me wonder, do we think Obama left this board completely alone during his eight years? Or might be have had a few of “his people” posting here to affect opinions?
If so, how many posters do you think Obama/Shareblue/Brock/Media matters would have on here? 5? 10? 20? Might they maintain several accounts, to, if they wanted, make it seem as if there are a lot of them holding a specific position? Do you think the GOPe maintained any accounts, to try and pimp a candidate like Jeb over a Trump? How many of those would you think there might be? What about lone wolves from the left? Might many of them maintain several accounts to give the impression there were a lot of people for Jeb who thought Trump was a NY liberal who would ruin the party?
I have wondered if all the people trying to denigrate the Q people are something bigger which has lurked here for a while, trying to mold perceptions of this site.
I admire your “deplatforming, not Q” passion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
