Q Anon: 10/10/18 Trust Trump's Plan

qmap.pub ^ | 10/10/18 | FReepers, vanity

[867V309]

Q made the gravest mistake of his or her life entrusting his or her disclosure to the fools the write these horrifically constructed FR announcements.

nevertheless, it is entertaining.     like watching a dumbocrap female politician beauty pagent.

[greeneyes]

You know what happens? Whatever behavior you notice is what you get more of. I simply ignore them. Your theory makes a lot of sense.

[blu]

Please note my ignoring of the uber smelly dumpster diver.

[ssschev]

OH Gee Eddie01 who pissed in your Wheaties, We love you F’tards too. :)

[JockoManning]

You seem to be desperately in need of an educational experience. Please allow me:

1. The Q-team of mostly military intel and 3 civilians have not ordered or directed anything about our Q threads on FR.

2. To decide if something is good/bad, worse/better; etc. one needs to know: (A) The goal related (B) How one measures whether the goal has been reached or not. (C) The context,

3. The Q-team affords Trump's efforts and strategies an impressive array of motivating and red-pilling 20-60 million Q followers gearing up to help red-pill the population at large when the dramatic things really start breaking out in the MSM.

4. It is a novel and new phenomenon. Past standards and criteria will likely not fit well in assessing the project--regardless of the omniscient arrogance pretending to do a quality assessment.

5. With 2300+ drops, we have a vast database that has been brilliantly dissected, analyzed, interpreted, generating a great number of quality commentaries--all in behalf of restoring and protecting The Republic. Folks not aware of that data commonly make exceedingly ignorant, stupid naysaying assaultive comments--rendering themselves looking like clueless, narrow, rigid, exceedingly ignorant jerks.

So you have joined a smallish group of folks making skunks smell like Chanel #5 by comparison.

As to ransomnote, she has done a massively herculean job with great tireless diligence; brilliant thoroughness that is still quite readable by the vast majority of us; significant organizational skills and faithful attention to the original Q drops as well as other quality inputs about such. She deserves huge amount of praise if not a Congressional Medal, imho. Certainly she deserves FR's applause.

[kelly4c]

How come the Q threads don’t really state anything new regarding Q posts though? I feel like I’m missing something here. Is he/she still actively posting stuff? If not, what are these threads for?

[ssschev]

Eddie01 is mad, Oh, Eddie01 is mad, HO HO Eddie01 has lost its brain. Where has Eddie01’s brain gone???? Should we pick it up from the floor, or let it drool out the door?

[ransomnote]

We have some activity on the thread that I encourage all to ignore. :)

(repost from #38 of this thread)
Lately I've noticed trolls and a few of the anti-Q posters are switching to "provoke" tactic. A few threads back, a troll (you wouldn't guess which one) that pretends it doesn't read our threads misunderstood something posted and thought I was angry; it quickly sent me an insulting pm in an attempt to provoke an angry response. I think that's that's the strategy now among trolls and some anti-Q's who want our threads gone -> some claim were crazy and a cult, then they claim we are H8ters if we rebut them. That's what tonight's gambit seems like to me.

We saw that with Kavanaugh - insult him and then complain loudly that he's belligerent when he responds. I think that may be what is being done on our thread (similar post to me a few threads ago) and to some of our posters who travel the forum. Please ignore it - it means nothing. Leave them starving for attention. :D

MAGA!

[ransomnote]

We have some activity on the thread that I encourage all to ignore. :)

(repost from #38 of this thread)
Lately I've noticed trolls and a few of the anti-Q posters are switching to "provoke" tactic. A few threads back, a troll (you wouldn't guess which one) that pretends it doesn't read our threads misunderstood something posted and thought I was angry; it quickly sent me an insulting pm in an attempt to provoke an angry response. I think that's that's the strategy now among trolls and some anti-Q's who want our threads gone -> some claim were crazy and a cult, then they claim we are H8ters if we rebut them. That's what tonight's gambit seems like to me.

We saw that with Kavanaugh - insult him and then complain loudly that he's belligerent when he responds. I think that may be what is being done on our thread (similar post to me a few threads ago) and to some of our posters who travel the forum. Please ignore it - it means nothing. Leave them starving for attention. :D

MAGA!

[ssschev]

Well said Jocko,
I am in a pissy mood and would rather btch slap the well btchs.. and happy to do so. I feel so much better now... Kek.

[right way right]

Maybe if someone were to decrypt maybe 10 main Q drops that have been of greatest effect, people could see that something is going on.
Or not.

Why does Q NEED to be so encrypted?
That is what seems so pointless to so many. Why the encryption when the enemy can just watch the drops too?

[lyby]

MAGA

[JockoManning]

You can check out the most popular commentators and interpreters for the added info, conjectures etc. Many are quite brilliant. Most are on youtube unless being censored for their conservative perspectives etc. Some are on Patreon. Some are on Gab. Some are on BitChute. My favorites:

PRAYING MEDIC
STROPPY ME--the AUSSIE
DUSTIN NEMOS
TRACY BEANZ
DECEPTION BYTES
SUNDANCE
and a few others I'm not recalling at the moment.

And, there is a long thread on GOPBR--which includes a ton of links to such videos, twitter threads etc. Most of those links are without a lot of commentary. Some have a lot of commentary with a fair amount of new information. Volume 1 had 64,000+ views. Vol 2 has 14,000 views or so currently. VOL 2 is here

http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,328649.new.html#new

I think of FR's Q threads as more like a vast brainstorming session to kick around the latest Q drops and what seems to be presented in them; possible implications; sources; interpretation options etc. I don't know that our major goal is to find new information, per se. We are thrilled when we dig out new information but I don't think it's our top priority.

bagster might have a better response to your critique.

[JockoManning]

Understandable feelings.

[right way right]

I guess eddie was too unsteady.

I bet he just got a time out.