thanks. I’ve been chasin this for a long time.
at least you looked at some stuff.
What leads you to believe NYPD let some things out within 24hrs ? 24 hours of what date ?
What makes you think Lynch quashing a NYPD investigation is believable, when there really is no proof NYPD is involved in the first place ?
as FYI:
The IG report:
“Weiner” is mentioned 463 times
“Laptop” is mentioned 739 times.
“NYPD” is mentioned 0 times
“police” is mentioned 3 times. None is related to New York.
“lynch” is mentioned 565 times, none is related to NYPD
I need to suspend disbelief to think that NYPD is involved but not mentioned in the IG report.
I would like to hear your whys.
Thanks.
1. Because of the NYPD SOURCED public assertions within 24-48 hours of the first major event about Weiner’s arrest/laptop.
2. Those same initial assertions were quickly removed, buried, denied, squelched, removed. That immediately said to me they were accurate.
3. I felt in my spirit that the assertions as horrible as they were—that they were the tip of the iceberg and solidly true.
I’m not that surprised that the NYPD was not mentioned in the IG report. TONS of stuff was left out of that initial IG report. It is clear to me that the disclosures are to be made in very calculated iterations over significant periods of time. Perhaps to enable the culture to absorb such without disintegrating.
The video at this link has some interesting data on the issue
at about minute 20:00—28:00
imho, you are as wrong as rain about Shrillery and her horrific child abuse . . . and about the NYPD’s awareness of such.
The evidence for such is somewhat around the edges of the major media and even a lot of the alternate media.
However, the evidence is available if one searches thoroughly enough.
SHIPP has the clearance and history and connections to know what he’s talking about.