[JockoManning]

1. Because of the NYPD SOURCED public assertions within 24-48 hours of the first major event about Weiner’s arrest/laptop.

2. Those same initial assertions were quickly removed, buried, denied, squelched, removed. That immediately said to me they were accurate.

3. I felt in my spirit that the assertions as horrible as they were—that they were the tip of the iceberg and solidly true.

[stylin19a]

repeating an assertion doesn’t answer the questions I have posed.

When\what date was the first major event about Weiner’s laptop\arrest ?”

I don’t take any issue with the contents of weiners laptop. I take issue that NYPD has any role in this.

Riddle me this:
It there were NYPD SOURCED public assertions and they were removed ( completely ? from the entire world wide web ? ) how do YOU know they even existed ? Did you see them ? with quotes from named NYPD sources ?

Here is the True Pundit story - please note if there is any concrete sourceable info in it.

https://truepundit.com/breaking-bombshell-nypd-blows-whistle-on-new-hillary-emails-money-laundering-sex-crimes-with-children-child-exploitation-pay-to-play-perjury/

Heres Princes interview 2 days later - please note if there is any concrete sourceable info in it - see if anything matches True Pundit report?.

https://www.breitbart.com/radio/2016/11/04/erik-prince-nypd-ready-make-arrests-weiner-case/