Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/01/2018 10:31:06 AM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Dick Bachert

It has Germs


2 posted on 08/01/2018 10:33:36 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dick Bachert

What!? They didn’t tell us?!!!

Wait, I remember this in high school economics. College economics, Grad school economics.

And you know what. The value of money has been more stable on a year to year basis since we’ve had fiat money than when we were gold backed.

With the exception of the Great Depression (Fed was still learning) we’ve not had deflationary depressions at all.

I call that a win for anybody who is not trying to store cash in their mattress for 50 years.


3 posted on 08/01/2018 10:35:47 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dick Bachert

What!? They didn’t tell us?!!!

Wait, I remember this in high school economics. College economics, Grad school economics.

And you know what. The value of money has been more stable on a year to year basis since we’ve had fiat money than when we were gold backed.

With the exception of the Great Depression (Fed was still learning) we’ve not had deflationary depressions at all.

I call that a win for anybody who is not trying to store cash in their mattress for 50 years.


4 posted on 08/01/2018 10:35:47 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dick Bachert

What!? They didn’t tell us?!!!

Wait, I remember this in high school economics. College economics, Grad school economics.

And you know what. The value of money has been more stable on a year to year basis since we’ve had fiat money than when we were gold backed.

With the exception of the Great Depression (Fed was still learning) we’ve not had deflationary depressions at all.

I call that a win for anybody who is not trying to store cash in their mattress for 50 years.


5 posted on 08/01/2018 10:35:48 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dick Bachert

It may be the devil.
It may be the Lord.
But you gotta serve somebody.

-—Bob Dylan

That phrase allows someone like me to understand what you are saying and still have peace. I’m thinking The Serenity Prayer.


6 posted on 08/01/2018 10:35:49 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dick Bachert

Money, it’s a hit.


8 posted on 08/01/2018 10:36:33 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dick Bachert

The Rothchilds have done a hell of job, leave them alone. Do you really think a world this rich isn’t going to be run by someone? They’ve been at this a long time, and I’ve had 50 good years, and so have many millions. You have no idea what the alternative might be like.


10 posted on 08/01/2018 10:45:54 AM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Hmmm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dick Bachert

AND WHY NOBODY IN THE SWAMP WANTS TO PAY THE NATIONAL DEBT.

the house of Rothchild har started wars to grow sovereign debt. Making citizens into slaves of rising taxes is a money machine.


12 posted on 08/01/2018 10:51:54 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dick Bachert

Printed, fiat money, and manipulated interest rates (and hence the Federal Reserve) are the bedrock and foundation of the progressive-left nanny state, and all their social-engineering schemes.

Conservatives will NEVER win against socialism / progressivism while we have our present monetary system. Sorry to say it, but you are wasting your time with your posting, voting, demonstrating, etc... as the state and socialism will always win in the end as long as they have unlimited money they control.


13 posted on 08/01/2018 10:57:41 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dick Bachert

Bitcoin is the future (not a joke)


14 posted on 08/01/2018 10:58:45 AM PDT by Scythian_Reborn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dick Bachert

the unnecessary deaths of your kids in banker arranged wars


Nuts much?


15 posted on 08/01/2018 10:59:25 AM PDT by sparklite2 (See more at Sparklite Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dick Bachert

Tricky Dick took us off the gold standard by executive order, which I don’t think he had any authority to do. Trump could revoke that executive order.


17 posted on 08/01/2018 11:01:36 AM PDT by TBP (Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dick Bachert

“Rothschild family criminal enterprise”

uh, yeah. paper money is de jews fault because paper money never existed before de jews ... i believe there was some former big-wig leader in Germany that blamed the world’s woes on de jews too ...


23 posted on 08/01/2018 11:27:54 AM PDT by catnipman ((Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dick Bachert

Two issues here. The fed reserve system and the (unnecessary) dredging up of the old “Rothschild” conspiracy crap. The fed is a compromise between “public interest” or governmental power, and capital markets. It is imperfect almost by definition... I’d characterize it as a marriage of convenience if not necessity. Not much there to really love. And, I don’t like some of its policies, such as the deliberate depreciation of the currency over time as an “economic stimulus” measure. However, nobody’s offered a better system, imho. Giving full economic power to the politicians in government may very well be worse. And, giving the capital markets full power the same. You could say that shared power between these two “devils” is a very crude sort of “ checks and balance system” that can sometimes, not always, ameliorate or limit the damage that giving just one of them would enable , lead to. At any event, the rothschilds are nowadays minor players - they were far more significant a couple hundred years ago- or even 100. Today, 99 percent of banking is controlled by other people. If someone wants to criticize bankers or question their conduct or power - fine, just focus on the banks that actually wield most of that power today. Always going back to the rothschilds misses the main target ( and raises a question of motivation that we needn’t deal with I think here). Think Barclays Swiss Deutschbank hsbc and anerica’s Big four banks - for starters. Thanks


42 posted on 08/01/2018 12:12:59 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ( "Politicans aren't born, they're excreted." -Marcus Tillius Cicero (3 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson