Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Should Pay for the Mistakes on NASA’s Next Big Telescope?
The Atlantic ^ | 7/18 | Marina Koren

Posted on 07/27/2018 3:59:09 PM PDT by LibWhacker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: LibWhacker
Budgets and schedules are secondary to diversity awareness and high Engagement Scores on the annual Gallup Survey.

Obama, Bush and Clinton destroyed our defense contractors' effectveness.

Allowing a consolidation which resulted in only three major defense contractors also reduced competitiveness.

21 posted on 07/27/2018 5:44:16 PM PDT by caltaxed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii
Part of the Hubble mirror problem was the yearly budgeting.

The "work" done on it was not continuous, for one thing.

Can't remember the lack of lack of gravity compensation when the mirror was "built" and "tested" in Earth's gravity.

22 posted on 07/27/2018 6:45:29 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Had Congress not changed the original specs


23 posted on 07/27/2018 7:08:19 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke

Wasn’t it President Reagan that said an elephant was a mouse built to govt. specs?


24 posted on 07/27/2018 7:55:59 PM PDT by skepsel (Apres moi, le deluge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: lee martell
From an original cost estimate of $500 Million, now over 8.8 Billion, 17 times the original cost.
It freaks me out just wanting to make a comment about this thread. Other than both sides are at fault, accepting a contract loose enough to allow this to happen.

Moving right along...

25 posted on 07/27/2018 8:34:15 PM PDT by publius911 (Rule by Fiat-Obama's a Phone and a Pen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

You mean like the F35 fighter aircraft?


26 posted on 07/28/2018 1:23:23 AM PDT by prophetic (Trump is today's DANIEL. Shut the mouth of lions Lord, let his enemies be made the Cat Food instead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke

And the requirements were all hammered out using the waterfall method which is a very right management implementation style. Has anyone tried the Agile method recently?


27 posted on 07/28/2018 1:26:44 AM PDT by prophetic (Trump is today's DANIEL. Shut the mouth of lions Lord, let his enemies be made the Cat Food instead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
That's what happens when one tries to stay "cutting edge" instead of building what was originally designed and then moving on to the later technologies - delays and huge cost overruns.

This happens because they know that once a project is being funded, it is easier to modify it to many times the original cost than it is to scrap it and replace it with a new project....ran into this crap a LOT when developing courses for NSA...idiots kept demanding unnecessary integration so even programming a switch (maybe done once every 3-6 months) could be done from main consoles instead of via the console developed specifically for programming the switch....they kept crying, "Gotta stay cutting edge" and I kept telling them that if they didn't pick a point and finish, they would be chasing that cutting edge after Jesus returned....and never have an operational suite.....I wasn't their favorite person at any of the meetings...

28 posted on 07/28/2018 4:12:10 AM PDT by trebb (Too many "Conservatives" who think their opinions outweigh reality these days...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prophetic

I would be happy if the products specified were still readily available at the time of execution.


29 posted on 07/28/2018 4:40:05 AM PDT by KC Burke (If all the world is a stage, I would like to request my lighting be adjusted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: RedStateRocker

Yup. But NASA is notorious for change orders and the contractors rape us taxpayers on them.


30 posted on 07/28/2018 4:50:31 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (If I knew when I was going to need my gun, I wouldn't need my gun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

The reason why we and other “aliens” cannot contact each other is because of cost overruns.....


31 posted on 07/28/2018 3:15:25 PM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

That’s the other half of the equation.
NO CHANGE ORDERS> PERIOD. It should bed written into law for all government contracts- NO change orders, no delays, to exactly balance the absolutly enforced obligation of any and all contractors to deliver.

Some things should be absolute and unchanging; any contract for design, building or implementation should be so on both sides.


32 posted on 07/29/2018 9:13:58 AM PDT by RedStateRocker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson