Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lisa page will not Appear
https://twitter.com ^ | 31 minutes ago | Paula Reid ‏ Verified account @PaulaReidCBS

Posted on 07/10/2018 6:41:23 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper

Interesting stuff!


61 posted on 07/11/2018 1:29:11 AM PDT by Paul R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper

“AG Sessions and/or the President should fire her,”

She’s already resigned.

L


62 posted on 07/11/2018 3:17:21 AM PDT by Lurker (President Trump isn't our last chance. President Trump is THEIR last chance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Jail.
63 posted on 07/11/2018 4:25:56 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul R.

Yes. It is often done as a courtesy, but it isn’t a legal requirement.


64 posted on 07/11/2018 5:21:25 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

She should be awaiting execution by firing squad.


65 posted on 07/11/2018 5:26:36 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

100 years form now this period in US history will be known as the “great ‘deep state’ coup d’etat attempt of 2016”.


66 posted on 07/11/2018 5:29:34 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Speaking of not testifying, anyone know if it’s still on for Peter Strzok today? Time? Hope to be able to watch some here at work.


67 posted on 07/11/2018 5:33:07 AM PDT by CodeJockey (Trump... The exorcist of Cultural Marxism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Did anyone really think justice would be served in all of this?


68 posted on 07/11/2018 5:38:03 AM PDT by Baynative ( "If you don't have a seat at the table, you're on the menu.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeJockey
In a sane world this is how her day should really be going...


69 posted on 07/11/2018 5:38:31 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: central_va

After a fair trial and conviction, a rope awaits these criminals.


70 posted on 07/11/2018 5:39:28 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Paul R.

They are probably not allowing her to see the documents she produced.


71 posted on 07/11/2018 5:44:55 AM PDT by AppyPappy (Don't mistake your dorm political discussions with the desires of the nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
I don't care... if people meddling with our elections are named Pyotr Sergey, or Peter Strzok...

I don't care if "Pyotr's" two-bit whore is called Larisa or Lisa...

I don't care if they work for the FBI or KGB or FSB or DOJ...

I CARE THAT ENEMIES OUR OUR COUNTRY WORKED TO OVERTHROW A DULY ELECTED PRESIDENT.

IF PETER STRZOK AND HIS WHORE ATTEMPTED TO OVERTHROW A DULY ELECTED PRESIDENT AND NULLIFY THE VOTES OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THEN THEY ARE ENEMIES OF OUR COUNTRY.

And should be tried for treason.

72 posted on 07/11/2018 6:25:41 AM PDT by GOPJ (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-s1_nfs7f4 STOP https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-IsingvI_I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

Enforce the subpoena.


73 posted on 07/11/2018 6:28:41 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears; CodeJockey; MadMax, the Grinning Reaper; a little elbow grease; Paul R.; Lurker; ...
I don't care if people meddling with our elections are named Pyotr Sergey, or Peter Strzok...

I don't care if "Pyotr's" two-bit squeeze is called Larisa or Lisa...

I don't care if they work for the FBI or KGB or FSB or DOJ...

I CARE THAT ENEMIES OUR OUR COUNTRY MEDDLED IN OUR ELECTIONS AND WORKED TO OVERTHROW A DULY ELECTED PRESIDENT.

When Peter Strzok and his squeeze worked to overthrown a duly elected President and nullify the votes of the American people they became traitors and should be tried for treason.

74 posted on 07/11/2018 6:48:16 AM PDT by GOPJ (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-s1_nfs7f4 STOP https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-IsingvI_I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

This is all part of the “STALL” Plan! Statue of Limitations don’t work for Reps(Manafort) but do work foe every Dem. The rest run interference. Page was on Meuller’s Team from June 2017 until UNK. There is no information on why she was there, what she did and/or why she left. Then she returned to the FBI for a few months and then left again. No one bothered to document anything. No one bothered to ask.

Page will never testify. She has a fake deal like the Clinton staff. Probably given immunity a year ago. In return she is required to “do nothing”. DOJ has exonerated Lerner, Awans, Podestas, Blumenthal, etc... Its okay. Sessions has 1.3 Trillion Sealed Indictments! /s


75 posted on 07/11/2018 7:00:07 AM PDT by DrDude (Waiting for the Game to start. Gotta move the Goal Posts again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt; Luke21; Lurker
"Who is the LEO branch of Congress?

There isn’t one."

Actually, there is.

Sergeants at Arms - is the chamber’s principal law enforcement official

2 U.S. Code § 5605 - Law enforcement authority of Sergeant at Arms - The Sergeant at Arms of the House of Representatives shall have the same law enforcement authority, including the authority to carry firearms, as a member of the Capitol Police.

Congress Has a Way of Making Witnesses Speak: Its Own Jail:

From the Republic’s earliest days, Congress has had the right to hold recalcitrant witnesses in contempt — and even imprison them — all by itself. In 1795, shortly after the Constitution was ratified, the House ordered its sergeant at arms to arrest and detain two men accused of trying to bribe members of Congress. The House held a trial and convicted one of them.

In 1821, the Supreme Court upheld Congress’s right to hold people in contempt and imprison them. Without this power, the court ruled, Congress would “be exposed to every indignity and interruption, that rudeness, caprice, or even conspiracy, may mediate against it.” Later, in a 1927 case arising from the Teapot Dome scandal, the court upheld the Senate’s arrest of the brother of a former attorney general — carried out in Ohio by the deputy sergeant at arms — for ignoring a subpoena to testify.

The Congressional Research Service issued a report in July (2007) that confirmed Congress’s inherent contempt powers. It explained how they work: “The individual is brought before the House or Senate by the sergeant at arms, tried at the bar of the body, and can be imprisoned in the Capitol jail.” Congress can do this, the report concluded, to compel them to testify or to punish them for their refusal to do so.


76 posted on 07/11/2018 10:35:34 AM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

I forgot about them. Thanks.


77 posted on 07/11/2018 10:50:57 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt
Indeed! It's something that has been used so infrequently, that most don't remember congress has that authority...backed by the courts.

Only, this (R) controlled congress is so gutless, they are afraid to assert their lawful authority on many levels.

78 posted on 07/11/2018 10:57:20 AM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: bitt

In a sane world she would be locked up.

Isn’t it Failure To Appear or some such thing?


79 posted on 07/11/2018 6:26:47 PM PDT by Califreak (Take Me Back To Constantinople)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Califreak

she gets a choice - appear tomorrow with Stzrok; appear Friday for a private deposotion; or both. If she doesn’t appear by 10:30 am Friday, they will place her in contempt.

What they do after that is ?????

They would refer her to the Sargeant at Arms, and he would take her into custody? Or refer her to the DOJ (let me LOL here...


80 posted on 07/11/2018 8:55:58 PM PDT by bitt (Obama was eloquent with his lies, ..Trump is brutal with his truth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson