Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Q Cult, and the First White House Advisor Calls For Dismantling The FBI {video}
https://www.youtube.com/ ^ | roypotterqa Published on Jul 2, 2018

Posted on 07/03/2018 12:18:03 AM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK

Steven Miller says the FBI is criminal and should be abolished. The Q cult has turned vitriolic and attacks established, proven patriots. It is NOT intell from a White House insider loyal to Trump, but a campaign by HRC, Obama, Media Matters, Soros and the IC to misinform and divide Trump's base and destroy Trump and MAGA.

The Q Cult, and the First White House Advisor Calls For Dismantling The FBI


TOPICS: History; Reference
KEYWORDS: agentsprovocateur; commiepsyops; drugassisted; hypnosis; ncppf; q; stevenmiller; waronthefbi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 07/03/2018 12:18:03 AM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

The FBI is a proven mixed bag.
It contains bot patriots and traitors of the highest orders.

I don’t worship the FBI, nor do I try to follow the Q stuff.

Establishing a replacement and then shutting down the FBI is reasonable.


2 posted on 07/03/2018 12:53:56 AM PDT by MrEdd (Caveat Emptor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

If the Dems think shutting down ICE is sensible, then they should have no qualms over remaking the FIBs.


3 posted on 07/03/2018 1:41:55 AM PDT by Zack Attack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

If you think Q is what what it claims to be, that’s easy to prove: Just ask Trump directly, or ask his Press Secretary. Claiming to be an insider group deeply and closely allied with Trump practically demands that this be done.

So why has no one done it?


4 posted on 07/03/2018 1:43:30 AM PDT by sourcery (Non Aquiesco: "I do not consent" (Latin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

It would have a little more merit if he wasn’t quoting from a Steven Miller parody account. LOL


5 posted on 07/03/2018 1:51:42 AM PDT by No_Doll_i
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

The FBI should be torn down and rebuilt, like the military was after the Vietnam War. Or just torn down, either way.


6 posted on 07/03/2018 1:53:07 AM PDT by Dr. Pritchett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sourcery

Q is BS !

Old time Freepers will remember “Quidam” from the Clinton impeachment.

Quidam impressed the naive with his supposed “insider knowledge”.

Quidam also had the vague oracle style and urged us all to “Trust Starr”.

Then when the predicted impeachment didn’t happen, big “insider” Quidam told us “many are compromised”.

Here’s a hint. If there is anyone with big insider knowledge of what is really going on, like Rosenstein and his senior staff, they don’t post it on 4Chan or FR !


7 posted on 07/03/2018 2:06:00 AM PDT by Reverend Wright (Liberals are filled with fury because their time is short.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Wright
Q is BS !

O contrare, mon frer.

Bagster

8 posted on 07/03/2018 2:19:10 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Wright

Just ask Trump, or his Press Secretary, what the official White House stance is on Q Anon. No fuss, no muss. It really is that simple.

Why has no one done this? Especially, why haven’t those who insist Q Anon is a LARP done this?


9 posted on 07/03/2018 2:28:08 AM PDT by sourcery (Non Aquiesco: "I do not consent" (Latin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

It seems to me that people in the White House, at a minimum, know about the Q phenomenon. If Q were a hoax, if Q were spreading false information, I think the president would tweet something, or make some public comment to blow it apart and tell his followers that they should pay no attention to such silliness.

But the president has not made a move to disavow Q. And there seems to be some evidence that the president supports Q. I don’t think it’s a hoax.


10 posted on 07/03/2018 2:31:54 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (If you beleive the dog, then take his advice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Wright; raiderboy
Do some research at the provided link regarding Nunes and what he's up to with regards to this article. Ya just might larn sumpin'.

https://qanon.pub/

Bagster

11 posted on 07/03/2018 2:33:56 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Wright

Not to be a nit picker, but Clinton WAS impeached. Just not convicted.


12 posted on 07/03/2018 2:39:48 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sourcery

And if you ask the first question, then the immediate follow up question will hound them until the end of the administration.

Is it real?
Who is it?

Once the question is asked, Q is finished. (With either answer.)


13 posted on 07/03/2018 2:42:23 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK; kcvl
The Dean of the Gitmo Bar http://www.weeklystandard.com/sites/all/files/imagecache/teaser-large/images/teasers/15-27.Theissen.jpg Meet Michael Ratner, lead terrorist defender. Mar 29, 2010, Vol. 15, No. 27 • By MARC A. THIESSEN In recent weeks, controversy has erupted over demands that the Obama administration release the names of lawyers working in the Justice Department who once represented or advocated for captured al Qaeda terrorists. But amid the debate, one name has thus far mostly escaped mention: Michael Ratner. Don’t know him? You should. Ratner is the president of the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR), the organization that is leading the legal crusade on behalf of the al Qaeda detainees. The center was founded in 1966 by William Kunstler and a group of radical lawyers. Its name is an Orwellian play on words—implying that the organization’s purpose is to defend our constitutional system when its real objective is just the opposite. As Kunstler once told the New York Times, he considered himself a “double agent” whose goal was “working within the system to bring down the system.” http://www.weeklystandard.com/keyword/Michael-Ratner 24 posted on ‎9‎/‎21‎/‎2012‎ ‎6‎:‎26‎:‎53‎ ‎PM by kcvl

Ratner was involved in the NCPPF, Sami al Arian's group, which was established to go after the FBI and US intelligence agencies...

Ratner's thinking, naturally, means from the inside.

14 posted on 07/03/2018 2:48:17 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Roy Potter = "roypotterqa" of the thread's linked Youtube video, and Roy has some credibility "considerations"
15 posted on 07/03/2018 2:59:39 AM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

unfortunately when it was formed there was not enough defined oversight, our country has become too large to manage fbi, cia, etc, it is now obvious that legally we cannot hold them accountable so in the name of caution, because of the damage renegade agencies can do all intel agencies should be disbanded, and reformed with specific division scopes of action, each closely supervised..

At this point the danger from a runaway intel is greater than not having one..we cannot abide any unlawful, unaccountable agencies as we have had for decades, as far as I am concerned the same with our debt etc..I would rather have dirt roads I own than diamond plated sparkle which generations owe for...


16 posted on 07/03/2018 3:12:16 AM PDT by aces
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt
Once the question is asked, Q is finished. (With either answer.)

You haven't thought this through. The reason they don't ask the obvious question is, they know it's real. Once they ask, and the President affirms, we move on to the discovery phase. ALL THE Q POSTS.

Think about what that means. Q had this to say about that. This partial Q post of a couple days ago was in response to an inquiry about asking "the question." Q had previously said "why don't they ask" about Q. He had said that they may have to "force it" since they aren't asking. Here is his explanation of why.

It must happen.
Conspiracy no more.
Think of every post made.
It would force us to prove everything stated to avoid looking crazy, correct?
What do they fear the most?
Public awakening.
---
Q

Anyway. We shall see who is right soon enough. No sense bitching about it.

Bagster

17 posted on 07/03/2018 3:15:06 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
So why has no one done it?

Because the leg-tingling media are acting as prosecutors in regards to President Trump. In court you never ask a question unless you expect the answer to help your case.

18 posted on 07/03/2018 3:20:52 AM PDT by JustaTech (A mind is a terrible thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JustaTech
So why has no one done it?

Because they know that asking the question will destroy them.

They are stupid, but just smart enough to know that much.

Also, they do what the Mockinbird tells them to. Nothing more, nothing less.

Bagster

19 posted on 07/03/2018 3:26:04 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK

Video pimping?

And preposterous.


20 posted on 07/03/2018 3:29:10 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson