Posted on 07/02/2018 9:44:18 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK
Right on. Every conservative needs to have a cup of STFU. Get activated. We own this republic, act like it.
levine is certifiable. if we had listened to him, Trump would NOT be president. nuff said.
+1 - the America we have now is unrecognizable as is
“They ignore the Constitution as it is now!!! How will changing the Constitution make socialists obey it?? “
That’s exactly why I say repeal the 17th Amendment before you do anything else. Such an amendment could not be cheated.
I’ve been seeing this CoS pushed by Levin and others for a couple of years.
I’ve NEVER seen anything about what their ultimate goals are if such a CoS was actually successful.
Anyone here familiar with what the hell they want?
If this phony wasn’t cheerleading torture, rendition, and all the other abuses of the Bush II disaster, I’d be more interested. He’s a discredited hack who shouts loud.
It seems to me that a COS would be a boon for states rights and could get some good amendments passed. Congress has done a very poor job amending and protecting the Constitution.
Yes:
Amendment to repeal the 17th (direct election of Sinators)
Amendment for Congressional term limits (eg, 12 years, any combo for Rep terms and Sinator terms)
While the “balanced budget amendment” is older, and on a different path, the current COS may advocate for some financial-related amendments in that vein.
Term limits on federal judges
Basically, what the States themselves view as limiting the power of the feds, and restoring federalism - that has been increasingly usurped over the last century by congress. And, amendments that congress itself would never think of coming up with.
Read the article. Read other articles on COS.
A great deal changes when you shift the power from one where representatives are population-based (congress), to where the delegates vote in a one-state-one-vote basis (COS).
The following link seems to list ten “Liberty Amendments” that Levin proposed in his book of the same name (with commentary on them by the author of the linked blog page)
https://constitutionalism.blogspot.com/2013/08/mark-levins-liberty-amendments.html
Read the article; read other articles; can't happen no-way no-how. period.
The whole purpose of the COS is to eek congresscritters out of the process, and to propose amendments that congress would NEVER propose on their own, because it's for limiting fed power. ALL delegates will emerge from their individual states.
And, most of all as a protector of what you fear, it shifts the voting power to states that elected Trump, and 'R's in general.
Well, I read through the list, and the blogger disagrees with most of them. So at least it gives another viewpoint of them.
I clicked on a recommended link on the page [amend-it dot org] and Bitdefender blocked it saying:
This page is blocked by Bitdefender Antifraud filter.
Is this just the dreaded ConCon with a new name?
As I understand everything would be on the table.
For starters, how long do you think Amendment 2 would last?
Guaranteed first item changed.
Bingo Bango bongo. I am all in with the SMART FOLKS who recognize the CONSTITUTION is Not the problem, and amending it through an Article V convention is not the solution.
I got almost twenty years on you dude. I’d be happy to have the 80’s back. Regan was president then.
Bingo Bango Bongo I don’t want to leave the Congo!
Noticing your tag line, I have to ask, is your response perhaps a line from a movie?
Careful. A whole lot more municipals and other Democrat interests are wanting that convention more than conservatives who want it. And many commie local and state government interests (see government unions including teachers’ unions) would love to be the gate keepers of all of the Senate and many other levers of power.
I don’t recognize America from just 10 years ago.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.