Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Herbert Hoover and the largest tax increase in American History
PGA Weblog ^

Posted on 06/30/2018 10:06:38 AM PDT by ProgressingAmerica

I like how the constant harping and carping about tariffs these days gets invoked together with fearmongering about Smoot Hawley and the Great Depression. What is missing? The Revenue Act of 1932. After the 1929 crash there was a small tax cut, but this was overshadowed by Smoot Hawley just months later. In the middle of bad economic times, you simply don't raise taxes, and yes, a tariff is a tax. But let's get to the meat of the numbers, shall we?

The Revenue Acts of 1918 and 1921 had a top tax rate of 73%.

The Revenue Act of 1924 reduced this to a top tax rate of 46%.

The Revenue Act of 1926 reduced this again to a top tax rate of 25%.

It was not raised from this number until The Revenue Act of 1932, which had a top tax rate of 63%. This was lower than the ninteen-teens tax rates of 73%, but considering the jump of 25% to 63%, this is over a 100% increase and it indeed was at the time the largest peacetime tax increase in American history.

But that is not what we received in 2017. For all its flaws, the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act does a reverse-Hoover by lowering taxes. I can explain; there is a certain formula here:

1929: poor economy, raising tariffs, largest tax increase in American history. (From what I can tell, they were not lowering burdensome regulations in 1929 either)

2017/2018: decent economy, raising tariffs, lowering taxes as well as lowering regulation.

See the stark differences here? Most of the time we hear that these tariffs should not exist and they will only lead to trade wars and other issues. But in reality it is the 16th amendment which should be repealed. The only thing they get correct when talking about this issue is that a mixture of income taxes and tariffs is a deadly combo. They should not be mixed. But it isn't the tariffs which should be eliminated, it is the income tax which should die a horrible and bloody death.

The Founding Fathers used tariffs as the only (or at least main) form of taxation, and that is probably the most proper way of taxation. The irony of tariffs is that they are in general taxes only on the rich - the problem is that it does not grant the kind of authoritarian domestic controls that income taxes bring, which is really what the progressives love and seek.

Even with taxes, the issue is not actually the issue. For progressives, control is the issue and control is always the real issue. Everything else is merely window dressing. It's always been about control and it has been this way going back to 1906 when income taxes were first proposed by the president in his SOTU that year. It's all about control.


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: progressivism; tariff; taxes; taxincrease
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: fieldmarshaldj; MUDDOG; TBP; LS; BillyBoy; GOPsterinMA; NFHale; stephenjohnbanker; ...

Amen. God damn the liberal historian scum for character assassinating a great President, Warren Harding, placing him at or near the bottom when he belongs near the top.


21 posted on 07/01/2018 5:14:37 PM PDT by Impy (I have no virtue to signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Impy; ProgressingAmerica

Guys, I’ll say it again as you’ve probably heard it from me possibly many times.

To achieve our goal of MAGA by restoring our Free Constitutional Republic, we MUST do the impossible job of dismantling the unconstitutional 80% portion of the federal government.

Do that, and we can easily have a flat tax of 10%-15% and the IRS would become a storefront. In the meantime, our economy would hit the stratosphere as has never been seen.

Impossible yes, but our God, the same Divine Providence that impossibly birthed our nation, is with us and I believe with Him it can and MUST be done.

Take heart and keep fighting the good fight of faith and freedom.


22 posted on 07/01/2018 6:29:50 PM PDT by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Then the progressives win.

You happy with that outcome?


23 posted on 07/04/2018 4:01:46 PM PDT by ProgressingAmerica (We cannot leave history to "the historians" anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

The progressives win if I pay more for goods on top of other taxes? I don’t follow.


24 posted on 07/04/2018 4:29:26 PM PDT by Impy (I have no virtue to signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Do the progressives win if we surrender and allow the 16th amendment to continue?


25 posted on 07/04/2018 4:45:13 PM PDT by ProgressingAmerica (We cannot leave history to "the historians" anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica
1906 when income taxes were first proposed by the president in his SOTU that year

Might be reaching out on a limb here bit pretty sure Jeff Davis and the Sons of the Founders would have let me keep my cash.

26 posted on 07/04/2018 4:49:36 PM PDT by Rome2000 (SMASH THE CPUSA-SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS-CLOSE ALL MOSQUES-GOD WITH US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

Hey I’m all for repealing it. But I’m not optimistic it will ever happen. I hope it does. Simply abolishing the income tax without repealing it would be far easier, requiring only majorities in Congress and the President’s signature.

In the meantime, don’t put new taxes on top of the income tax cause then we’re paying both.


27 posted on 07/04/2018 4:50:48 PM PDT by Impy (I have no virtue to signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

Yet another great post, thank you.


28 posted on 07/07/2018 11:34:54 AM PDT by Weirdad (Orthodox Americanism: It's what's good for the world! (Not communofascism!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson