Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Repealthe17thAmendment

I think you are mistaking a figure of speech for a dogmatic assertion. We all use figures of speech in common everyday language. “I love meatballs,” or “I’m sweating my ass off.” There are literally thousands of examples. The scientist saying “that shouldn’t be there” is using a figure of speech to say it is something unexpected, something new to add to his knowledge and to be explored. Not arrogance, but wonder.


16 posted on 06/07/2018 11:35:54 AM PDT by Avalon Memories ( Proud Deplorable. Proud born-in-the-USA American Dreamer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Avalon Memories

That’s correct. Also — it is a noteworthy statement because it indicates a surprise finding.


18 posted on 06/07/2018 11:38:48 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Avalon Memories

Could be, I just read it one way. I guess the climate change scientists have given me a negative view of the professional scientist.


44 posted on 06/07/2018 12:24:15 PM PDT by Repealthe17thAmendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson