Posted on 05/03/2018 8:06:25 PM PDT by Beave Meister
This is just my take on the entire Q Anon situation. I attempt to break down what Q Anon is, who created and who took it over.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
I'm sure you did and the hoaxter hosting the video is laughing all the way to the bank with his subscriber hits.........
P.T. Barnum was way ahead of his time........LOL!
Really? Well that's what people do to ‘hook’ others. Then they tell you you're privileged to know such things over everybody else...and finally that you need to hang out with just those who seek what you 're seeking....they'll even create 'safe places' for you to go..
Spin spin spin. The Olympics we’re going on
But you didn’t know they were discussing denuclearization
It was a yes or no question, but as usual you just attack and insult like a 4th grader, sounding a lot like David Hogg.
I pretty much expected that from you—it’s your trademark. You try to act humorous, but it really doesn’t work. This isn’t your safe space Qook thread. Your cheerleader accolyte echo chamber-fu is not strong here.
But I do hand it to you—you are smart enough to duck the question, as you know you don’t believe that Q-CIA-NK-nuke crap, right? But (like Corsi), you can’t publically laugh at your Q tribe and their truly crazy conspiracy ideas or you will lose the helium ego mojo that keeps you pumped up. There’s a lot to be said for being a big fish in a small (special ed) pond. Driver of the short bus has its priveledges, eh?
Behind the scenes, though, you don’t believe the CIA controls North Korea, and developed nukes over there.
Do you? Yes or no?
It’s not a complicated question, and even us non-Q believers can understand “no.” Which is what you would have to actually say.
I trust you will duck it again, and insult again. If you show at all.
So your proof that you aren’t a troll is the opinion of a different troll on a different board. LOL ok
That was fascinating—thanks for the breakdown. I once incited a lynch mob by merely pointing out that Q doesn’t talk about ‘our savior,’ the way Christians do. Q is certainly not who it’s claimed to be.
Yeah, you want to truly trigger the Qooks?
Tell them Pizzagate is a Hoax.
(It is.)
No, it's OK, but just above average.
Although you can be half-witty.
Tsk....
WTH are you talking about? I quoted YOUR presentation of the Q-drop regarding the carrier battle groups in the Pacific. Then I (no one else) explained why the Q-drop was inaccurate and highly misleading. If you are having trouble comprehending such a simple and obvious example of Q-cult incompetence then no one will ever be able to help you people.
First you deny Q. Then you deny my superior assholery. Now I know you're just saying shit to be saying shit. You are a science denier.
Although you can be half-witty.
I like that one.
Bagster
Have you seen what happens if their isn't a Q dropping for a few days on the "friendly collaborative" thread? The Qers start turning on one another, generally resulting in one or more storming off to go watch Netflix or American Idol because one of their pithy "jokes" was misunderstood.
Oh, I’ve seen the Qers turn on each other. They can plunge into internecine warfare very quickly if the conditions are right. Two of them [that I know about; there are probably many more] left never to return.
There’s a wellspring of smoldering hostility over there. They need threads like this one that allow them to to vent their spleens on skeptics; otherwise the pressure builds to a periodic intra-Q beatdown.
Not the David Hogg card. Both hurtful and culturally relevant. Your burns exist on several planes all at once.
Your cheerleader accolyte echo chamber-fu is not strong here.
I beg to differ, sir. My cheerleader, acolyte, echo chamber-fu is both deadly and unstoppable. Your David Hogg-fu style is no match. You have never meet the like of my gung fu style and will likely never again. Not on this earth. Only Laz can hope to survive the encounter. And you are no Laz.
you know you don’t believe that Q-CIA-NK-nuke crap, right?
You know you don't know what I know. Capisce?
Behind the scenes, though, you don’t believe the CIA controls North Korea, and developed nukes over there.
I wasn't there for the meetings or conversations. How could I possibly know? And neither were you. So how could you possibly know. But you strut around with your superior attitude as if you do. Why?
I would believe the CIA and the deep state, in the form of Obama and the Clintons and others, gave nuke and missile tech to NK before I believe that those dummies developed it on their own.
And I would believe that the CIA, representing a global cabal has propped up the NK failed state to be used as leverage against nation states in the area and the west before I believe they have acted totally independently.
The fact that China is finally brokering the stand down of NK tells me that, though they have used NK as well, they are not the only puppet masters. The fact that Eric Schmidt of Google travelled to NK tells me something. The appeasement by the Clintons tells me something. The denial by the deep state media of the gains in NK tells me something. The deep state dems and rinos denying and even being pissed off at Trump's success tells me something. John McCain's warmongering tells me something. Don't all those things tell you anything?
Yes. I believe the deep state/cabal has controlled North Korea in a sense. Not in the child-like way that you put it, of course. Realpolitik is more complicated than perhaps you are capable of understanding. Hence, your denial of Q.
Does that answer your yes or no question?
Go back to your noodlings. The grownups are in charge.
[Iran] is next.
Bagster
Ooohhh, you think someone else wrote that? rofl, you really are a clown. That was my own off-the-cuff commentary on the ineptitude of Q’s misuse of the US carrier group deployments. No other “board” consulted or needed, thank you. Straight out of my own lil non-Q head right now, just minutes ago. The fact that you and everyone else in the Q-cult has been so oblivious to the obvious errors and blunderings of “Q” has contributed to the animosity. Not to mention the fact that you guys never want to learn anything that does not further your Q-cult narratives. Sorry to upset you.
Haha. Did I piss you off, carload?
Bustin' on my poor peepers now?
tsk tsk.
Simmer down. I still like ya'.
Bagster
Have you ever been “debunked” by a Q person? I was debunked last night. Ouch!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.