Replies

Even the little hints that are being dropped turn my stomach.

I do hope it isn’t true.

I haven’t been wanting to go too far off in that direction just in case it isn’t.

It seems very possible though if you think about spirit cooking “artist” and the cannibal club restaurant.

Those things are right out in the open.

I conclude there must be large numbers of THEM and if they are bold enough to do that out in the open, little telling what goes on behind closed doors in dark places.

And little telling what they might do if they aren’t stopped and feel threatened by total exposure.

some points Re: fake picture.

1. Yes, it was fake, but there are similar things out there that are NOT fake. If you want to see some really creepy “art” do a search to find out what kind of art the Podesta brothers have in their homes. I forget whether it was John or Tony or both. The Washington Post FEATURED it in the Sunday magazine section a few years ago and people acted like it was perfectly fine and if you didn’t like it you were stupid and uncultured.

2. Be aware of this manipulative propaganda technique: If they want you to disbelieve some horrible thing, they will try to conflate it with something else that is provably false and also horrible or preposterous. The idea is that once they prove that ONE of the things is false, the vast majority of people will assume BOTH things are false.

Example: They will put out memes/articles, etc that say something like “I saw politicianX having lesbian sex with bigfoot”. So if there are rumors flying around that politicianX is a lesbian and they don’t want you to know that, they figure you will focus on the unlikelihood of bigfoot’s existence and just ignore the whole thing because you assume the person who wrote it is a kook and that the whole thing is wrong.

I have been watching (from as much a distance as possible) the stories of pedophilia. I don’t think that every dirty politician is a pedophile. But I believe that some are. I predict that they are going to try to throw out the charges against some of them by proving that others are not or by proving that auxiliary crimes are false. They will try to make us look stupid for believing some PART of the story that we get wrong and then try to invalidate the entire thing.

I’m not saying that no one has tortured children or any of the other horrific things that are being claimed or hinted at. I have no idea and the thought of it is so horrifying that it is hard to believe. (But people didn’t believe they were gassing the Jews in WW2 either, because it was so horrifying that it was hard to believe.) But just remember that just because ONE part of the accusation turns out to be false (or unprovable) doesn’t mean that ALL of the accusations are false.