Posted on 02/12/2018 3:56:31 AM PST by ransomnote
Edited on 02/13/2018 7:01:59 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to share information and opinions about Q Anon content. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3630912/posts?q=1&;page=1>
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
All Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following link:
You can locate my prior Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference:
A FReeper list of acronyms used in Q Anon "drops."
Please private message me to report trolls. The Admins have limited time to deal with requests regarding trolls and I'm hoping to reduce abuse reports from this thread from multiple persons into one set of requests.
If you are new to Q Anon trolls, you may find the following thread useful.
Q Anon: Increasing levels of disinformation and trolling
LOLOLOL
Dude, you are on FIRE tonight. Preach on, brother.
Read great grandfather. He goes into long detail and it’s contemporary.
http://www.iment.com/maida/familytree/burnett/lincoln.htm
On Mary Surratt and the stories that were already circulating:
“But as illustrating still further the malicious representations that followed this trial, let me recall to your minds the letter of Mrs Jane Swisshelm, published in the New York Tribune of September 16th, 1873. In this letter she gives the impression that Mrs Surratt was manacled in court during her trial, and vividly pictures how on one occasion she (Mrs Swisshelm) was present in the court, and gave public exhibition of her suffering and indignation at this outrage and cruelty. The Washington Chronicle, noticing this letter of Mrs Swisshelm, addressed a note to Mrs Surratt’s counsel, Mr Aiken, making inquiry as to the fact. He replied as follows:
“I have your letter of this date, inclosing the letter of Jane G. Swisshelm, published in the Tribune, the 16th inst. and asking me, ‘Is her statement true that Mrs Surratt was manacled during her trial?’ Without reference to any other fact, or to any of the details of the case of that most unfortunate lady, I have to say in reply that at no time during her unlawful trial was Mrs Surratt manacled, either on her wrists or her ankles, while in the presence of the court. I not only speak from my own absolute knowledge, but from recollections of Mrs Surratt’s oft-repeated statements to me that she was not manacled.”
“The Chronicle adds, “Now can any fair-minded person, however prejudiced, come to any other conclusion than that the garrulous lady had willfully and maliciously misrepresented the facts, for the mere purpose of glorifying herself?”
“I must agree with this conclusion because I know personally that Mrs Surratt was not manacled, and that no such scene as Mrs Swisshelm described ever took place in the courtroom. But this letter of Mrs Surratt’s counsel did not put underground the falsehood that she was manacled during her trial — periodically it reappears, fresh and vigorous.”
Interesting note. The trial was transcribed by the Pittman of Pittman Shorthand.
Nor do many people read books, especially the techno crowd. But put it on the internet and make it a detective like game, and all of a sudden, the kids are playing and learning.
_____________________________________________
A MMPOG? One that bleeds over into the real?
The designers of such games are known as puppetmasters.
They tend to emphasize This Is Not A Game, as, IIRC, Q has also said. Everyone knows/thinks it is an actual game, but the object is to suspend disbelief so everyone acts as though TINAG.
To wake the young masses:
Set up a MMPOG.
Arrange for it to bleed into the real.
Use the players to accomplish tasks in the real.
Call it....oh, I don’t know...Mastermind?
And remember: TINAG.
My ‘Q is real” meter just pegged. Think about all the research going on. People/places/times ID’d. Forgotten history resurrected. Principals tracked by thousands, so there’s nowhere to hide.
Who needs a digital AI when you can run an analogue one on a digital platform?
If you’re right, this is not only real, it’s freaking brilliant. Everyone collectively educates everyone, in real time. By the time things come to a head, we’re all aficionados of the Cabal. And, BTW, that includes anyone who might be called to a civilian jury. Might be that the defendants scream for a change of venue and there will be no place left partial to them. Which means the donk party is extremely marginalized.
I lose track of how many birds with this stone....a entire flock of them.
More to the point is they are attempting to make the case that circumstantial evidence can NEVER be believed, that only concrete evidence should be used, even it has been made impossible to be produced and that destructive act can be shown as part of the circumstantial case against those who destroyed the hard evidence. No matter how overwhelming the circumstantial the case, they want absolute proof.
HMMMMMM
It comes in liquid form. If it were a powder we could make pills out of it. Maybe it’s possible for it to come in a solid form, but they don’t because of dangers of overdose by ingestion if it were more available? A liquid can be integrated into a patch.
The patch form works because fentanyl is fat-soluble. Fat-soluble drugs are able to cross barriers, like the skin and cell membranes. Druggies don’t want the patch form, per se, they want the rush. So they have to put a hot pack over a patch or something like that to get the drug out faster. Injection satisfies the rush much faster, so liquid is going to be much more valuable on the street. The only thing going for patches is availability. You can steel them from grandma rather than from a pharmacy.
33 lb of fentanyl = 15 kg = 100 mcg (standard injection vial size) x 150 million doses.
Let’s say someone staged an attack using fentanyl. The standard treatment for known opiate overdose is Narcan (naltrexone). If it’s an unknown cause, a ‘coma cocktail’ would include Narcan anyway because opiates are such a likely cause for someone to come in unconscious. If they’re breathing alright on their own, you don’t have to give Narcan, you could just support them (probably need fluids too for blood pressure support) and wait it out, but respiratory depression would definitely push for Narcan. If you ran out of Narcan, another option would be Intralipid or the fat component of transparental nutrition (when you feed someone through an IV). Injecting fat rapidly increases the volume of distribution for the drug. The hospitalists at my training program had rapid results for all sorts of drug toxicities using that.
I think Q is incorrect on some of this big pharma stuff. Look at post 690.
Make sure the list of resignations remains updated.
Important.
When does big pharma make money?
Curing or containing?
Cancer/AIDS/etc.
Mind will be blown by chain of command.
Q
The answer is neither curing nor containing. The answer is that they make their money while the patent is still good! They have 20 years from the time a drug is invented or patented before other companies can start making generics. This time is shortened by spending 8 years getting FDA approval before the medication even reaches the market. Sometimes a drug company gets around this by reformulating a drug (this happened with the change of the insulin Lantus to Toujeo, which is just a higher concentration form). Sometimes a drug company avoids the competition simply because manufacturing the drug is too difficult. Sometimes generics just aren’t reliable (they are supposed to have at least 90% efficacy compared to the parent). Sometimes a drug is used so little that no one bothers making a generic (they won’t make any money either) and there’s a risk that a valuable medication might be discontinued by the original manufacturer. Etc. But for the most part, they make their money in that window.
That’s why assertions that the drug companies are hiding cures for things are bogus. They are under high pressure to research things quickly and get them to market before the opportunity is lost. Someone coming up with a cure for cancer or AIDS or whatever would stand to make a huge amount of money AND would destroy the income their competitors derive from selling drugs that only contain a disease.
Trump’s proposal during the SOTU speech, that patients be able to use experimental drugs more easily when nothing else works, actually widens the window drug companies have to sell their new medications under patent. They stand to benefit from this financially and wouldn’t have anything against Trump here.
a tall, elegant black woman in a long blue dress—the canvas is enormous, eight feet by ten feet—calmly staring down the viewer. In one hand, she holds a knife. In the other, a cleanly severed brunette female head. “It’s sort of a play on the ‘kill whitey’ thing,” Wiley says. pic.twitter.com/v1QMz01SIV— Joe Biggs (@Rambobiggs) February 13, 2018
The timestamp is 12:15:20, not 15:15:20
_________________________________________
Looks like your eyes cleared up! Good job!
I like how you think!
You’re not getting what I’m saying, so never mind. Sorry.
nothing like a good old war to kill off our good young men.....look at Viet Nam....the country has not recovered from the wars in the 20th century in good husband/father material..
What’s weird to me about the red shoes is that they are all the SAME red shoes.
And that’s creepy about wanting to show them to the Pope.
Yes, one of the top uses for a “Q” type operation would be to dis-inform the enemy. Make them jump and watch what they do, where they go, who they call, what they try to bury...
Well there is plenty of concrete evidence. The problem is figuring out what it all adds up to. It’s like putting a puzzle together. If you don’t try to put the pieces together you can’t say there is no puzzle on the grounds that I don’t see how it fits together.
Wow, you said a mouthful. Thanks for that. Very educational. Yu did leave out one thing. Can personal people on the street manufacture fentanyl? Like they can for meth? Or does it ONLY come from legit drug manufacturers. I’m looking to understand Q’s statement about an “attack on big pharma.” Does he mean an attack on fentynol distribution like some are saying or is it something else. Something bigger. Some legislation or something.
While watching Obama speak he used the word Fly 3 time.Referring to his wife”She is fly”Then he said it 2 more times in a different context.He professed his love to her as his artist cut off female’s heads.Michelle explain how hard it was to be a black.She explained how hard it was for a black to walk into the oval office.So the black artist promptly made her Mexican.
Both of us eagerly apologize for all unwarranted hurt, offense, insult, and the like--way back many years ago or whenever.
We would like you to understand and realize that Qx's opus was a sacrificial effort (of his FR membership) trying desperately to provoke Jim out of his increasingly self-defeating behavior toward major donors for relatively shallow reasons. Qx could not handle the thought that Jim was going to end up blowing himself and FR out of the water by such increasingly frequent self-defeating actions.
He knew that no one else would dare try to speak tough enough and provocatively to jar Jim out of that pattern of behavior. Qx realized it had a low probability of success but he felt that Jim was dear enough and FR crucial enough that Qx had to try, regardless of the costs to himself.
Qx knew that normal calm language, persuasions and pleas would have NO influence on Jim at all. That's why he had to come up with such a startling sort of verbal slap upside the head to try and get Jim to shake himself loose from the self-destructive rut he was in and try something different with regard to the big donors and to some degree--members in general.
Qx still greatly loves Jim and still prays for him persistently. He realizes (and realized beforehand) that probably few to no one on FR would understand why he did what he did. Thankfully, God knows. He is grieved that the FREEPATHONS take almost the whole 3 months now. That's sad for Jim and for FR.
He has prayed and racked his brain to try and come up with some suggestions as a way out of that current routine but he hasn't come up with anything.
Don't know what else I can add. Both of us want relationships that are cleared and forgiven and forgiving between us and everyone--whether either side is guilty of whatever or not.
WE are both much more mellow and humbled from 15-20 years ago. We have never claimed to be flawless or perfect or saintly. But we have also not been near as evil and ugly as some have made us out to be.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.