Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Q drop #29: Reason for cryptic format, North Korea is "directed", pedophiles
qcodefag.github.io ^ | Oct 31 2017 | Q Anon

Posted on 01/20/2018 11:17:32 PM PST by ransomnote

Q drop #29

Oct 31 2017 23:13:10
Anonymous
ID: grTMpzrL
147452214
Some things must remain classified to the very end. NK is not being run by Kim, he’s an actor in the play. Who is the director?
The truth would sound so outrageous most Americans would riot, revolt, reject, etc. The pedo networks are being dismantled.
The child abductions for satanic rituals (ie Haiti and other 3rd world countries) are paused (not terminated until players in custody).
We pray every single day for God’s guidance and direction as we are truly up against pure evil.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: believeanything; bigfoot; bs; fake; funny; gibberish; gullible; larp; nonsense; northkorea; pedogate; pedophiles; pedophilia; q; qanon; qrap; qtards; schizophrenia; silly; trafficking; ufos; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 381-389 next last
To: bagster

Do you seriously not know who James Baker is?


101 posted on 01/21/2018 3:08:03 AM PST by WayneS (An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: WayneS
Do you seriously not know who James Baker is?

Seriously. Sorry.

I know who the Reagan chief of staff James Baker is. But this one is a more modern era James Baker.

I wish I was smart like you, but I'm not.

Tell me. I like to learn.

102 posted on 01/21/2018 3:14:34 AM PST by bagster (Even bad men love their mamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

What are tendies?


103 posted on 01/21/2018 3:15:40 AM PST by bagster (Even bad men love their mamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: bagster

How do you know James Baker one is a “more modern era” James Baker? Who told you?


104 posted on 01/21/2018 3:18:30 AM PST by WayneS (An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Correction:

How do you know this James Baker is a “more modern era” James Baker? Who told you?


105 posted on 01/21/2018 3:19:55 AM PST by WayneS (An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate
How about if it’s the Democrat Party?
_______________________
Ask yourself would the DNC be able to do what it's doing (done already) without the blessing of the CIA? Could Obozo have become ‘president’ without the blessing of the CIA? Could the CIA have done what it has done without the blessing of the Deep State/Globalists?
106 posted on 01/21/2018 3:21:55 AM PST by iontheball (lLL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: WayneS
I found Williams’ “oh bs” statement to be just as valid and compelling as the author’s:

I know you're just saying that to make a point. You really don't believe that.

The author surrounded his statement with other thoughts and, whether you believe it or not, reasoning for his statement.

Poor old simple William simply ran in, shouted "Oh BS" and ran out. There was no justification for his statement. No logic, no reasoned argument. That I could at least respect and respond to.

But it's okay, 'cause here you are. Representing the "Oh, BS" consortium. I appreciate the mature manner in which you enter the debate. I surely am not the most articulate representative of the Qbirds, but I'll take a shot. Neither do I know all there is to know.

Ready?

107 posted on 01/21/2018 3:22:09 AM PST by bagster (Even bad men love their mamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

Comment #108 Removed by Moderator

To: WayneS
In my opinion, this “Q” character should either tell what he knows in plain factual language or he should STFU.

Not me. I hope he keeps yapping in any manner he sees fit. I'm sure he has his own reasons for his methodology and it's none of my business. I'm grateful for any information I can get.

At the VERY least, he is encouraging dialogue and shifting attention to important topics. He is, by having the public ask questions, applying pressure to politicians and people in power who would normally ignore these things.

In affect. He is waking us up. And by us, I mean the American people, not freepers in particular, though some of us could use a kick in the anus.

109 posted on 01/21/2018 3:40:35 AM PST by bagster (Even bad men love their mamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek
Well, who?

Asked and answered.

The theory is the deep state and the CIA. The case is laid out in this thread.

I'm not fully on board with this one, but am willing to listen.

110 posted on 01/21/2018 3:43:06 AM PST by bagster (Even bad men love their mamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: WayneS
Wayne, are you saying that you don't believe in the "deep state?"

I thought that was commonly accepted. Especially around these parts.

111 posted on 01/21/2018 3:44:43 AM PST by bagster (Even bad men love their mamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: WayneS
How do you know this James Baker is a “more modern era” James Baker?

a.) Because of the context of the list. It is supposedly a list of people who had private email addresses in the Obama administration and surrounding government.

b.) I vaguely remember hearing of a James Baker in the Obama administration in the not too distant past.

Are you trying to pin me down Wayne? To what purpose?

112 posted on 01/21/2018 3:49:07 AM PST by bagster (Even bad men love their mamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Jeb?


113 posted on 01/21/2018 3:50:48 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: bagster

Maybe I’m too cynical, or maybe I’ve seen too many bogus conspiracy theories, to be taken in by someone who comes forward making vague, veiled, claims with little to no factual evidence.

I am immediately “turned off” by people who use the “I know secrets but you can’t handle knowing them” style of reporting. I prefer facts, rationally presented as one adult would convey them to another adult.

It’s got nothing to do with timidity - I’ll be gladly do whatever is necessary to bring down corrupt politicians, but the burden of proof for me involves more than anonymous sources releasing cryptic information on the internet.


114 posted on 01/21/2018 3:58:17 AM PST by WayneS (An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: bagster
I am not trying to pin anyone down.

Since you are the one who included his name in your post, and you are the one who told me he was not the same James Baker with whom I am familiar, i was hoping you would know something about him, or that perhaps in your pursuit of the truth you would have looked him up.

It’s okay, though, I can do my own research.

115 posted on 01/21/2018 4:05:47 AM PST by WayneS (An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: bagster
Are you sure the name you heard associated with Obama was not Peter Baker.
116 posted on 01/21/2018 4:08:50 AM PST by WayneS (An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: WayneS
Maybe I’m too cynical

We all are. It comes from being lied to by our government and the press for our entire lives. We are conditioned to reject even the truth when we see it.

I prefer facts, rationally presented as one adult would convey them to another adult.

In the America that should be, that would be the ideal. We do not live in that America, though. Now we have a corrupt government infested with domestic enemies. What would happen to a government official who tried to leak out information of this sort in the way that you would prefer. At the very least, he would no longer have the access he honce had. And much worse consequences than that are possible, as we all have seen. Think Seth Rich and the Clinton death list.

No, Wayne. I don't blame you for your cynicism. I just ask you to keep an open mind and consider the possibility that not all "conspiracy theories" are a hoax. It takes a lot for me to throw off my own cynicism, given that I have been conditioned the same as you all my life.

this one feels legit to me. So I'm taking a chance.

If it turns out to be BS, I have lost nothing. But there is so much to gain by supporting it and spreading the word if it turns out to be true.

117 posted on 01/21/2018 4:11:17 AM PST by bagster (Even bad men love their mamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: bagster

James Baker was the FBI’s General Counsel (top lawyer) who was ‘reassigned’ when Wray took over. That James Baker leaked stuff to David Corn.

The much older James Baker III (Bush acolyte) was also friendly with Obama and hates Trump.


118 posted on 01/21/2018 4:12:26 AM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Ask yourself--how did NK get ICBM capability so quickly during Obama's 2nd term, when we were assured by the CIA that it was years away from happening?

The HIC memo is one thing, but the arming of NK to use against America by Obama and the cabal is quite another.

Yes, you read that correctly.

Obama/CIA/Google were arming NK to be used against the US to start a war, which Hillary would have presided over, to damage the US and to make the cabal a ton of money in the process.

119 posted on 01/21/2018 4:12:52 AM PST by exit82 (The opposition has already been Trumped!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
“The DIA report represented inconvenient facts that threatened President Obama's North Korea “strategic patience” policy – a policy to do nothing about North Korea

"All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"

120 posted on 01/21/2018 4:14:26 AM PST by rawcatslyentist ("All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 381-389 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson