Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2018 Detroit Auto Show: Achates, Aramco Launch 37-MPG Pickup Engine
Trucks.com ^ | 01/15/2018 | John O'Dell

Posted on 01/15/2018 4:49:20 AM PST by taildragger

2018 Detroit Auto Show: Achates, Aramco Launch 37-MPG Pickup Engine

John O'Dell
January 15, 2018
Auto Shows, Detroit Auto Show
Achates Power and Aramco Services have outfitted a Ford F150 with Achates' new compression-ignition, gasoline powered, opposed-piston engine the company says will deliver 37 mpg fuel economy without hurting truck's working capabilities. (Photo: Achates)

The developers of a gasoline-engine pickup on display at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit hope to enter the national conversation on fuel efficiency and emissions reductions.

Achates Power, a California-based engine developer, and Aramco Services, the transportation-focused U.S. arm of Saudi Arabian Oil Co., or Aramco, will be jointly testing the truck, a Ford F-150 outfitted with the Achates engine.

The goal is to demonstrate that the truck’s unique 2.7-liter, opposed piston, compression-ignition gasoline engine indeed delivers the 37-mpg fuel efficiency, 270 horsepower, 429 pound-feet of torque and 50 percent emissions reduction that Achates claims for it.

Those numbers, if substantiated in real-world testing, would make the Achates engine a revolutionary powerplant for full-size and light-duty pickups, which today average around 21 mpg.

Federal regulations — which still are subject to change — presently require light-duty pickups to average 33 mpg by 2025, a target the Achates gasoline engine beats by 12 percent.

“If every light truck had our engine, which represent about 40 percent of the market today, the fuel savings and the related reduction in emissions would be the equivalent of eliminating half of all passenger car production, cutting to about 5 million cars a year from 10 million,” said David Johnson, Achates’ chief executive.

“People are looking for reliability, good performance and efficiency, and if you can offer that you have a good chance,” said Michael Held, a Detroit-based automotive industry analyst with AlixPartners.

This is a good time to bring a new engine design into the market, Held said.

Auto companies, especially those with light trucks, “are going through heavy retooling and redesigning, especially in powertrains, to make sure they can meet future standards” for fuel efficiency and clean emissions, he said.

Saudi Aramco, which has a stake in continued use of fossil-fuel engines, is increasing its activities in the passenger vehicle segment and recently invested in Achates as part of the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative. The industry group is an alliance of major oil companies, including Aramco, BP, Shell, Norway’s Statoil, Spain’s Respol and Mexico’s Pemex.

Achates and Aramco plan a series of opposed-piston engine development projects, Johnson said.

The pickup demonstration is the first of the projects. The engine being used was developed by Achates under a $9-million grant from the federal Department of Energy.

The Achates opposed-piston engine can be configured to run on a number of fuels, including gasoline, diesel, natural gas and various biofuels, Johnson said.

It uses the heat from tremendous compression of the fuel, rather than a spark from an electronic ignition system, to explode the fuel and drive the pistons.

In its diesel configuration, the same 2.7-liter, three-cylinder opposed-piston engine being demonstrated in the Achates-Aramco pickup would deliver 42 mpg, Johnson told Trucks.com.

Hood of demonstration truck on display at Detroit Auto Show is cut open to show off Achates' engine.

Hood of demonstration truck on display at Detroit Auto Show is cut open to show off Achates' engine. (Photo: Achates)

The engine places two pistons in each cylinder. Each is connected to its own crankshaft. The design, based on the Atkinson-cycle engine developed in 1882, eliminates cylinder heads and valve trains, reducing engine complexity and cost while improving efficiency.

The Environmental Protection Agency has estimated that it will cost about $1,700 per vehicle in additional technology to meet the 2025 federal Corporate Average Fuel Economy requirements for light trucks. The Achates engine can help light-duty trucks meet the 33-mpg goal for less than half that amount, Johnson said.

The engine can be scaled up and down. One project underway is development of an Achates generator for commercial power plants in conjunction with Fairbanks Morse Engine, Johnson said.

Achates also is developing a high-efficiency diesel engine for the U.S. military in conjunction with engine giant Cummins Inc., and is doing additional engine programs for other vehicle manufacturers, Johnson told Trucks.com.

The military engine is a 1,000-horspower, 14.3-liter diesel for military fighting vehicles that also could be modified for use in heavy-duty commercial trucks, he said. It could also be scaled so small — a single two-piston cylinder model displacing about 0.5 liters — that it could be used as an on-board generator in range-extended electric vehicles, said Johnson.

The Achates-Aramco project involves continued refinement of the engine. Each company will be working in separate facilities — Achates in San Diego and Aramco Services in Novi, Mich., outside Detroit. Additionally, the two will jointly test the single pickup that’s been outfitted with a working engine, Johnson said.

The testing and ongoing refinements, coupled with work Achates is doing with several other vehicle manufacturers should result in commercial sales of Achates-engine equipped vehicles “in a couple of years,” Johnson said.

Johnson did not disclose the other partners.

Achates, founded in 2004, has attracted more than $150 million in financing, including private and government investment and payments from project partners, he said.

The private company’s most recent infusion was a $28.9-million investment in October from a number of private entities, including an undisclosed amount from the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: achates; engine; fueleconomy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

1 posted on 01/15/2018 4:49:20 AM PST by taildragger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: taildragger
Note, this is the compression ignition version running gasoline. Wrap your head around that one!
2 posted on 01/15/2018 4:51:42 AM PST by taildragger ("Do you hear the people Singing? Singing the Song of Angry Men!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taildragger
Apparently they are way beyond paper or vaporware here, production intent (IMHO) prototype in the dyno...


3 posted on 01/15/2018 4:54:11 AM PST by taildragger ("Do you hear the people Singing? Singing the Song of Angry Men!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taildragger
IF you are not familiar with the concept this is a Junkers ( aircraft ) type engine, i.e. two crankshafts with 2 pistons sharing a common bore and total elimination of the valve train. Externally scavenged ( source of air for the "intake" ) via a "Roots" type Supercharger / Blower.


4 posted on 01/15/2018 4:57:53 AM PST by taildragger ("Do you hear the people Singing? Singing the Song of Angry Men!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taildragger; Red Badger

Red, Diesel engine ping list please, their are diesel versions in the works as well 1000hp Military version!


5 posted on 01/15/2018 4:59:22 AM PST by taildragger ("Do you hear the people Singing? Singing the Song of Angry Men!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Ping.


6 posted on 01/15/2018 5:00:07 AM PST by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Compression ignition ping.


7 posted on 01/15/2018 5:00:08 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

I am extremely impressed with my 2014 Ram. I regularly get 21 mpg on the highway with this 400 HP V8. It’s the multi displacement I suppose.

I love the power when I need it. And not smoke and mirror high reving low torque tiny engine kind.


8 posted on 01/15/2018 5:02:58 AM PST by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

“will deliver 37 mpg fuel economy without hurting truck’s working capabilities.”

Yeah, as long as it is ‘working’ to deliver no more than a box of feathers.


9 posted on 01/15/2018 5:04:00 AM PST by Beagle8U (Wake up and smell the Covfef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

Have you researched the Junkers engines and what they powered? Large aircraft, DC-3 class, way ahead of their time, it takes torque to fly a prop plane that big. Roots Blowers = Low End Torque, which this engine uses for an air supply. I’d love to see a torque curve on this puppy, long, and flat as Kansas, but gobs of it, is my guess...


10 posted on 01/15/2018 5:10:27 AM PST by taildragger ("Do you hear the people Singing? Singing the Song of Angry Men!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

No, I don’t know anything about them.


11 posted on 01/15/2018 5:16:36 AM PST by Beagle8U (Wake up and smell the Covfef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

Opposed pistons sounds very negative.

I suppose they are opposed to everything along with each other.


12 posted on 01/15/2018 5:20:05 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

>>Red, Diesel engine ping list please, their are diesel versions in the works as well 1000hp Military version!

One of the submarines I served on had a diesel generator engine in this configuration. 5 cylinders and 10 pistons.


13 posted on 01/15/2018 5:20:08 AM PST by Bryanw92 (Asking a pro athlete for political advice is like asking a cavalry horse for tactical advice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

>>Yeah, as long as it is ‘working’ to deliver no more than a box of feathers.

The article says 429 lb-ft of torque.


14 posted on 01/15/2018 5:22:53 AM PST by Bryanw92 (Asking a pro athlete for political advice is like asking a cavalry horse for tactical advice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92
"The article says 429 lb-ft of torque."

Years ago I read somewhere an engine guy of note said Torque is a way to gage how efficient the air pump is, since an ICE is an air pump. 270 hp maybe 300 lbs of torque, but 429, makes this in a class of it's own. I wonder if the lack of a valvetrain and all its' friction drag is adding to the torque. Also I believe this style of engine has greater thermal efficiency, given 2 pistons are using one cylinder, that heat is staying their and utilized, not each individual one needing to be cooled.

15 posted on 01/15/2018 5:31:54 AM PST by taildragger ("Do you hear the people Singing? Singing the Song of Angry Men!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

I’m wondering the same. I have a 2012 F250 with the 360 hp V8 and I sometimes pull near 10 tons on a machinery trailer. It ain’t easy going up steep hills but it gets the job done.


16 posted on 01/15/2018 5:34:34 AM PST by Neoliberalnot (MSM is our greatest threat. Disney, Comcast, Google Hollywood, NYTimes, WaPo, CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: taildragger
Okay... thanks for the graphic. You really think this might make it to production vehicles like say, the F-150? In a couple of year, really?

I assume the manufacturers would acquire license to develop and build their own proprietary versions? Or maybe not?

17 posted on 01/15/2018 5:39:44 AM PST by OKSooner (Joan Rivers, RIP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

It doesn’t much look like an Atkinson design to me, no valves. Wow, opposing pistons, timed to compliment each other in the combustion cycle and operating in a single cylinder. Now why didn’t I think of that?


18 posted on 01/15/2018 5:39:48 AM PST by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92

“The article says 429 lb-ft of torque.”

Put that into layman’s terms. Will it pull a 3 bottom plow through cement?


19 posted on 01/15/2018 5:40:01 AM PST by Beagle8U (Wake up and smell the Covfef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

Two stroke? Will it sound like an old motor boat, or lawn mower? I bet it has a unique loud sound that they wrestle with regarding noise. A boxer engine is also notorious for vibration.


20 posted on 01/15/2018 5:42:22 AM PST by WeWaWes (When I look in the mirror I see an elephant--a bad ass elephant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson