Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TRUMP'S 13! #QAnon #Clinton #Indictments #CBTS (Review of 12/21/2018 EO Annex)
youtube.com ^ | 1/13/2018 | Youtube vlogger: The Right Media

Posted on 01/13/2018 7:11:16 PM PST by ransomnote

Youtube video 22:55 minutes in length.

Well organized, informative review of the 13 names listed on the Annex attached to President Trump's Executive Order dated December 21, 2018.

The vlogger concludes by offering his opinion that the EO Annex appears to identify 13 individuals which serve to indirectly target Clinton (i.e., Clinton was the original target but Trump intentionally veiled his target with the names on the list).


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: clinton; clintoncrimefamily; humanrights; indictments; qanon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Full text of Trump's Dec 21, 2018 Executive Order Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-blocking-property-persons-involved-serious-human-rights-abuse-corruption/

I thought the vlogger was great. He mentions at the start of the video that the EO allows assets to be freezed not just of the 13 persons named but those who donate to them.

The vlogger doesn't mention that one of the names, Dan Gertler, has his own foundation. When the EO was released in December of '17, a review of Gertler's foundation donors included Bill and Melinda Gates and the Clinton foundation as well as a few other recognizable large organizations. Checking the foundation website today with the intention of posting a link, I see that info has been scrubbed.

1 posted on 01/13/2018 7:11:17 PM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: admin

May I impose upon you to correct a date typo in the title of this post? The last few characters in the title I have written ‘2018’ when it should read ‘2017.’ Thank you.


2 posted on 01/13/2018 7:15:10 PM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Who are the13? Some would be obvious, some not.


3 posted on 01/13/2018 7:23:49 PM PST by BigEdLB (To Dimwitocrats: We won. You lost. Get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB

ANNEX

1. Mukhtar Hamid Shah; Date of Birth (DOB) August 11, 1939; alt. DOB November 8, 1939; nationality, Pakistan

2. Angel Rondon Rijo; DOB July 16, 1950; nationality, Dominican Republic

3. Dan Gertler; DOB December 23, 1973; nationality, Israel; alt. nationality, Democratic Republic of the Congo

4. Maung Maung Soe; DOB March 1964; nationality, Burma

5. Yahya Jammeh; DOB May 25, 1965; nationality, The Gambia

6. Sergey Kusiuk; DOB December 1, 1966; nationality, Ukraine; alt. nationality, Russia

7. Benjamin Bol Mel; DOB January 3, 1978; alt. DOB December 24, 1978; nationality, South Sudan; alt. nationality, Sudan

8. Julio Antonio Juárez Ramírez; DOB December 1, 1980; nationality, Guatemala

9. Goulnora Islamovna Karimova; DOB July 8, 1972; nationality, Uzbekistan

10. Slobodan Tesic; DOB December 21, 1958; nationality, Serbia

11. Artem Yuryevich Chayka; DOB September 25, 1975; nationality, Russia

12. Gao Yan; DOB April 1963; nationality, China

13. Roberto Jose Rivas Reyes; DOB July 6, 1954; nationality, Nicaragua


4 posted on 01/13/2018 7:25:50 PM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB

Foreign nationals. No EO would target American citizens like this, as citizens are entitled to full due process. Or at least as much as they can afford.


5 posted on 01/13/2018 7:29:28 PM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Thanks. Pther than GAO Yan, nobody is familiar. I want to see some well known names.


6 posted on 01/13/2018 7:31:14 PM PST by BigEdLB (To Dimwitocrats: We won. You lost. Get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

I’ve read some opinion that since the EO declares a “national emergency” due process entails, or can entail, military tribunals without the civilian processes with which I am more familiar.


7 posted on 01/13/2018 7:32:12 PM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB

The text of the EO said donors to these individuals can have their assets frozen. This must have frozen the assets of Clinton Foundation and the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation and I found that most encouraging.


8 posted on 01/13/2018 7:34:47 PM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Again, does not apply to US citizens. National emergency CONNECTED TO HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS enables an EO to use specific laws passed by Congress that have such a specific condition. These are described at the beginning of the actual EO.


9 posted on 01/13/2018 7:40:39 PM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

We disagree. In reading over the EO again, I still see references to foreign persons and people who support them. The people who support them do not have to be foreign. Sections iii and 4 for example.


10 posted on 01/13/2018 7:49:17 PM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Americans holding money for them would have that money confiscated. And Americans are prohibited from financial dealings with them. But any *prosecution* of Americans would be normal American due process.

The USA is under at least 30 different states of emergency. The one Jimmy Carter declared because of the Iranian hostage crisis is still in effect. If any old ‘national emergency’ involves official suspension of normal due process, President Trump wouldn’t have needed to declare this one at all.


11 posted on 01/13/2018 7:57:28 PM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Thanks for the link.

Under that video is a list of other videos....Trump, London trip, Julian A.

This particular one might be of interest - IIRC, heard just today that the President will NOT be going to London in February as planned.

Anonymous: World Holds Breath After Julian Assange Agrees To Trumps Terms
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XY1GJ4O-RqE

Thanks, again.


12 posted on 01/13/2018 8:22:57 PM PST by V K Lee (Anyone who thinks my story is anywhere near over is sadly mistaken. - Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: V K Lee

Interesting video. So, the deep state was going to assassinate Trump in London with drones and blame it on ISIS?


13 posted on 01/13/2018 8:36:44 PM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle

That’s the claim! Catch the part about Russia bombing the Hell out of those who were a part of the planned attack? Putin is NOT a Deep State lover. Seem to remember in the past week or so that news released about Russia’s bombing these dirty rotten scoundrels but no particular interest at the time and info was flushed.

The Chess play was discussed on an earlier thread about two days ago here at FR.


14 posted on 01/13/2018 8:51:21 PM PST by V K Lee (Anyone who thinks my story is anywhere near over is sadly mistaken. - Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

So is it confirmed TRUMP is going to pardon Assange for his evidence it wasn't the Russians??!!
15 posted on 01/13/2018 8:56:13 PM PST by KavMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Bkmrk Qanan 13


16 posted on 01/13/2018 9:23:09 PM PST by ptsal ( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V K Lee

WOW! Thanks for the link. My head is spinning. SOunds airtight but I wonder if it’s true?

I understood ‘MI’ from Q posts was Military Intelligence and that it was working for Trump against Deep State. Another post said 90% of military. I reasoned this was why there was a strange ceremonial display on Trump’s inauguration day. When Trump went to the podium to speak. UNsmiling representatives from each branch of the military stepped down off their dias and stood shoulder to Shoulder with Trump while he delivered his address and then when he stopped speaking, he returned to his chair and the unsmiling phalanx of uniforms went back to their places - no explanation given.

At the time I asked a FReeper military person what it meant and the mil said Trump was indicating that he had the military. Later Trump chose to surround himself with generals - it looked like good support.

But the Annonymous posting sounds like Navy MI and the video certainly has a good explanation and timeline. Q posted a picture of George Washington crossing the Deleware Dec 25, indicated patriots moving into harms way and went dark. Q followers checked into the image and found that Washington returned with prisoners and goods. So it was believed Assange would be freed that night or soon. They saw the Navy Julian Assange as confirmation because they believed POTUS had the military. WHy wouldn’t Trump be able to fire whoever he wanted in Navy Intelligence to clean that out.

What is most disturbing of course is the info re Syria planning to kill Trump on his visit. Had you heard the Russians were just attacked by that kind of drone and had losses? Believable. Disturbing. According to Q NK is CIA proxy and I assumed they had a big bunker there. Wonder what to think. Great link. Thanks.


17 posted on 01/13/2018 10:55:11 PM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Had you heard that Julian was made a citizen of Ecuador?

This happened about two days ago (heard this on one of the many news casts) Just Googled and found I’d heard correctly.


18 posted on 01/14/2018 2:17:54 AM PST by V K Lee (Anyone who thinks my story is anywhere near over is sadly mistaken. - Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: V K Lee

Yes. Goal was to let him leave country under Ecuadoran passport but CIA made UK refuse to accept the passport as legit (i.e., he’d be arrested if he left embassy).


19 posted on 01/14/2018 2:20:19 AM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: V K Lee

Very interesting indeed.


20 posted on 01/14/2018 4:15:09 AM PST by misanthrope (Sinister deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson