Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Falcon Heavy raised on pad 39A for first time
spaceflightnow.com ^ | December 28, 2017 | Stephen Clark

Posted on 12/28/2017 9:01:16 AM PST by BenLurkin

SpaceX’s first Falcon Heavy rocket, made up of two previously-flown Falcon 9 boosters and a beefed up central core stage, made the trip to launch pad 39A at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida and was raised vertical Thursday for testing ahead of its first liftoff next month.

The fully-assembled 229-foot-tall (70-meter) rocket will be the most powerful in the world when it blasts off, and Thursday’s arrival atop pad 39A marks a major step toward readying the Falcon Heavy for flight.

SpaceX engineers are expected to conduct a fit check and complete other tests at pad 39A this week, followed by a hold-down firing of all 27 first stage engines some time after New Year’s Day. The company has not set a target date for the Falcon Heavy’s first liftoff, but officials say the launch is targeted in January, some time after the hold-down hotfire test.

...

When it blasts off next month, the heavy-lifter will generate about 4.7 million pounds of thrust at launch. Musk said the first Falcon Heavy’s engines will be throttled to 92 percent of full power.

That will make the Falcon Heavy the most powerful rocket flying today, exceeding the European Ariane 5 launcher, the world’s leader in liftoff power at 2.9 million pound of thrust from two segmented solid rocket boosters and a core engine. SpaceX’s new rocket will produce more thrust than any launch vehicle since the space shuttle.

The Falcon Heavy will also be able to carry more payload into orbit than any other rocket in the world, a more important measure of the rocket’s lifting capacity.

(Excerpt) Read more at spaceflightnow.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: falconheavy; spacex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 12/28/2017 9:01:16 AM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

As an aside, the Saturn V was 363 ft tall and weighed 6.2 million pounds.

Of course it had a target much farther away.


2 posted on 12/28/2017 9:08:53 AM PST by mountn man (The Pleasure You Get From Life, Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountn man

The Saturn V had twice the lifting capacity of this one.

140 tons to low-earth orbit vs 140,000 lbs.


3 posted on 12/28/2017 9:23:42 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Let hope they don’t screw the puppy


4 posted on 12/28/2017 9:35:09 AM PST by al baby (May the Forceps be with you Hi Mom Its a Joke friends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountn man

I thought 39A had been demolished.


5 posted on 12/28/2017 9:39:25 AM PST by IronJack (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Saturn V (first stage) had 7.5 million pounds of thrust from its five Saturn engines. But it wasn’t trying for mere orbital velocity; it had to push a payload to escape velocity.


6 posted on 12/28/2017 9:41:18 AM PST by IronJack (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Musk keeps on delivering...


7 posted on 12/28/2017 9:43:03 AM PST by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

https://spaceflightnow.com/2017/08/05/shuttle-era-structure-dismantled-piece-by-piece-at-pad-39a/

Apparently, just a certain structure.


8 posted on 12/28/2017 9:44:26 AM PST by mountn man (The Pleasure You Get From Life, Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

Based on a couple of earlier posts, how can they clam the Falcon Heavy is the most powerful ever? I don’t get it.


9 posted on 12/28/2017 9:52:49 AM PST by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mountn man
As an aside, the Saturn V was 363 ft tall and weighed 6.2 million pounds.

Dang! Three and a half football fields high! I had forgotten how big this puppy was.

10 posted on 12/28/2017 10:01:18 AM PST by bubbacluck (America 180)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bubbacluck

Not quite. 63 ft. taller than a football field.


11 posted on 12/28/2017 10:22:24 AM PST by brooklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bubbacluck

You were playing on short football fields then.

363 FEET not yards.


12 posted on 12/28/2017 10:24:28 AM PST by mountn man (The Pleasure You Get From Life, Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

That’s actually not correct. The Saturn V only had to get the package up to about half the altitude of today’s Space Station, where it then spent about 2 hours in orbit before firing it’s third stage engines to escape earth. And during that orbit evolution, it was traveling about the same speed as the space shuttle.

And now they claim the SLS that comes on line in about a year or so will be heavier lift than a Saturn V.


13 posted on 12/28/2017 10:24:46 AM PST by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ... we.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

payload to lunar trajectory is about 17,000 kg

Mars is 16,000 kg

Saturn V had 50,000 kg to lunar


14 posted on 12/28/2017 10:26:44 AM PST by njslim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mountn man

Oops! Still big. More coffee on the way.


15 posted on 12/28/2017 10:37:12 AM PST by bubbacluck (America 180)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cymbeline

Most powerful operational rocket at the present time, not most powerful ever.


16 posted on 12/28/2017 10:56:26 AM PST by Campion (Halten Sie sich unbedingt an die Lehre!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bubbacluck

363 FEET = 121 YARDS


17 posted on 12/28/2017 11:02:44 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Isn’t this carrying the Tesla Roadster?


18 posted on 12/28/2017 11:15:40 AM PST by Colo9250
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colo9250

Supposed to, I guess. Musk thinks he can get it up to escape velocity.

I wonder if it’s really just the chassis and body.


19 posted on 12/28/2017 11:34:53 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

It is really astonishing how much is and has been going on in this area of endeavor. Wikipedia’s article on “Commercial Crew Development” makes this clear, although parts of the article are in need of updating...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commercial_Crew_Development


20 posted on 12/28/2017 11:51:16 AM PST by Paul R. (I don't want to be energy free, we want to be energy dominant in terms of the world. -D. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson