Posted on 10/23/2017 10:03:32 AM PDT by drewh
When conservative author and talk radio host Laura Ingraham sits down in the anchor chair on Oct. 30 for the first time as a host on Fox News’ evening lineup, the cable network will be making a multi-prong bet. The first is that its audience will gladly stomach another evening hour of ardent Donald Trump boosterism.
Already, there are signs of trouble. A number of Fox staffers are dreading the possibility of working for Ingraham, who, even among the healthy egos that populate America’s cable newsrooms, has built a reputation as overbearing. According to numerous sources, Ingraham has been,
Laura is not on board the Cheap Labor Express.
Most of Fox News is, that’s the problem.
Fake news.
Seems like they’re going out of there way to find something wrong.
This means obviously she is successful, that she doesn’t go with the Fox libRINO flow, and that she will kill it in the ratings.
Good grief. More fake news from the Left.
Trying to spike the show before it even starts.
Always enjoyed her commentary, but would not be surprised if it’s true that she’s not very nice behind the scenes.
I noticed a change in her on-air demeanor/persona, after her radio show “took off” around 2004 or so, and subscribers started to boost her income significantly.
exactly Laura is a threat to the globalist swamp!
Few remember that once Beck left Fox, Laura briefly got a 5pm show on Fox. It was awful. She started each show with what was supposed to be humorous observations on the day’s used. They weren’t very funny at all. And her stiff personality didn’t help.
I think she’s matured a bit and will be successful with the new show.
Laura is a threat to the globalist swamp!
Personally I expect Laura to have a hugely successful show on Fox. For me it will be Must Watch TV.
Laura had a show way back I think on MSNBC or something. It was a good show, but it was on before noon during the week and no one watched it because of its time slot.
The Daily Beast???
You know Chelsea Clinton is on their board.
I would not waste time with the Daily Beast.
“Overbearing” = “pushy.” How sexist of this article-um-er-propaganda piece.
She is doing this for the good of the country not to climb the celebrity ladder like me-again Kelly
Notice this hit piece makes it through three quarters of the article with unsourced attacks on Laura’s character, then finishes up with a few named proponents. Crap writing.
if Laura was a man, would they have written this using the word “overbearing”.
Daily Beast war on women
If she’s rich, then why did she have trouble paying her bills earlier this year?
According to numerous sources, Clinton has been, occasionally, a verbally abusive boss, who will not hesitate to scream at employees if something goes awry. Two former employees of her tenure in office recounted to The Daily Beast separate instances of Clinton hurling objects at staff members in displeasure.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.