News 3 Las Vegas interview with Cliven's Attorney.... (Cliven Bundy-BUNKERVILLE STANDOFF)

You Tube ^ | 9/28/2017 | JGrady

[Nextrush]

(At :20 News 3 Reporter Reed Cowan)....Cliven Bundy threw up his hands in the air and said he wanted to represent himself in this case against him by the federal government.

Well that made his attorney Brett Whipple file papers in federal court here behind me saying his client had requested that. The judge denied that request.....

(At :45 Attorney Brett Whipple)....He felt frustrated that he couldn't get his viewpoint out.....

(At 1:00)...Everybody thinks its about money. It has nothing to do with money it has to do with who was to receive the money. See, Cliven is of the position there are other folks who agree with him that it belongs to Nevada......

(At 1:22 News 3 Reporter Reed Cowan).....the public led to believe Bundy didn't want to pay grazing fees. His attorney though, says Bundy has paid them to Clark County, Nevada....

(At 1:28 Attorney Brett Whipple)...He has paid Clark County.....

(At 2:02)....He's had his freedom taken away from him for over a year and half and he has no privacy and no freedom and no ability to move about and its driving him crazy....

[Nextrush]

So there you have it. Cliven Bundy is willing to pay grazing fees and he's even sent the checks to Clark County, Nevada instead of the federal government over the years.

THIS CASE IS NOT ABOUT CLIVEN BUNDY NOT PAYING GRAZING FEES......

Cliven took the position Nevada owns the land after the federal government used the Endangered Species Act to drive his neighbors out of ranching decades ago while Cliven decided to carry on.

Cliven Bundy and six others (Ammon Bundy, Ryan Bundy, Ryan Payne, Pete Santilli, Eric Parker and Scott Drexler) are set to go on trial next Tuesday October 10th at federal court in Las Vegas.

Parker and Drexler will be tried for the third time while the others face their first trial.

[DoodleDawg]

So there you have it. Cliven Bundy is willing to pay grazing fees and he's even sent the checks to Clark County, Nevada instead of the federal government over the years.

Sending money to the wrong department is not an excuse.

THIS CASE IS NOT ABOUT CLIVEN BUNDY NOT PAYING GRAZING FEES......

Yeah it is, because I'm betting that Clark County didn't cash his check.

Cliven took the position Nevada owns the land after the federal government used the Endangered Species Act to drive his neighbors out of ranching decades ago while Cliven decided to carry on.

Turns out he was wrong.

[Texas Fossil]

Bunkerville Was Never About The Cows

https://itmattershowyoustand.com/2017/09/bunkerville-was-never-about-the-cows/

Dan Love Will Not Be Prosecuted

https://redoubtnews.com/2017/08/dan-love-not-prosecuted/

Agent (Love) no longer with BLM following Burning Man probe

https://www.ksl.com/?sid=45818361&nid=157&title=agent-no-longer-with-blm-following-burning-man-probe

BUNDY RANCH: Prosecutors Once Again Found Holding Back Information As Defense Attorneys Prepare For Upcoming Trials

http://thepetesantillishow.com/bundy-ranch-prosecutors-once-again-found-holding-back-information-as-defense-attorneys-prepare-for-upcoming-trials/#disqus_thread

The Western View: Bundy Trials

http://agnetwest.com/western-view-bundy-trials/

Bunkerville Standoff: Make This Case Go Away!
https://redoubtnews.com/2017/09/bunkerville-standoff-make-case-go-away/

FR Comments: https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3591112/posts

Fighting for the 1st Amendment in the Bunkerville Trial
https://redoubtnews.com/2017/09/1st-amendment-bunkerville-trial/

FR Comments: https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3591117/posts

[kiryandil]

I see the Big Government “conservatives” on Free Republic are on this thread defending the .govbullies...

[i_robot73]

>
Cliven took the position Nevada owns the land after the federal government used the Endangered Species Act to drive his neighbors out of ranching decades ago while Cliven decided to carry on.
>

Oh, he’s CORRECT, but not necessarily for the wrong reason(s).

Course, the ‘court’ doesn’t care about the Constitution, let alone A1S8, or another other Amendment(s).

[DoodleDawg]

Oh, he’s CORRECT, but not necessarily for the wrong reason(s).

Not really, no.

Course, the ‘court’ doesn’t care about the Constitution, let alone A1S8, or another other Amendment(s).

What you mean is that the Courts don't agree with your interpretation of the Constitution. Especially relating to Article IV, Section 3.

[i_robot73]

>
Oh, he’s CORRECT, but not necessarily for the wrong reason(s).

Not really, no.

Course, the ‘court’ doesn’t care about the Constitution, let alone A1S8, or another other Amendment(s).

What you mean is that the Courts don’t agree with your interpretation of the Constitution. Especially relating to Article IV, Section 3.
>

Humm, which comes first? A1S8 or A4S3? Another ‘Commerce Clause’ trumps all else theory?

The courts don’t ‘agree’ w/ the plain English of the CONSTITUTION; but damn if THEY are the ‘final arbiters’. We the People are, have been and always will be.

Forts, postal roads (setup) and the like. Not difficult to read and understand, except for a Leftist.

[DoodleDawg]

Humm, which comes first? A1S8 or A4S3? Another ‘Commerce Clause’ trumps all else theory?

That's like saying the Third Amendment trumps the Fourth Amendment. All Articles, Sections, and Clauses stand alone and equal in the Constitution. Position is meaningless.

The courts don’t ‘agree’ w/ the plain English of the CONSTITUTION; but damn if THEY are the ‘final arbiters’. We the People are, have been and always will be.

What makes your interpretation right and their interpretation wrong?

Forts, postal roads (setup) and the like. Not difficult to read and understand, except for a Leftist.

So...national parks? Unconstitutional. National highway system? Unconstitutional. Air Force bases and the Air Force itself? Unconstitutional. Air traffic control network? Unconstitutional. Is that what you're saying?