Posted on 07/08/2017 3:18:47 PM PDT by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
Sara Carter at about 7:30 am this morning raised the possibility that Russia might have interfered with the election to help Hillary NOT Trump.
I know that many FREEPERS have thought this since last year but what besides common sense being rare explains the paucity of this suggestion in the news?
I'd suggest that the left merely has to suggest the possibility of something and everyone runs it without question. On the right, if you don't have evidence that would hold up in court, you get attacked for even mentioning anything. Trump has experienced this already with the birth certificate debate.
Anyone else have any theories as to why the common sense things like duh, intel has been politicized so maybe we question this? Or, humm, Clapper and Brenner are the main people saying this, and their credibility is on par with Susan Rice...huh. Or even TRUMP thought Hillary would win. Wonder how the Russians picked the winning side on this? Why is no one asking this?
Here is my common sense argument to support this.
*************************
Russia DID try to influence the election but they did so to help HILLARY get elected, not Trump.
The people whom you have evidence of illegality on are the ones that you TRY to get elected. For example, China-Clinton. The Trump-Russian narrative doesn’t support this.
None of the deleted or damaging Hillary emails besides DNC or Podesta ones have surfaced suggesting people that have them like the FBI or enemies want to leverage them.
Didn’t she delete over 30,000 of them? I am going out on a limb her but I think Russia HAS these deleted emails. If they were trying to damage her, why didn’t they leak them?
But think of other Russian interests.
They would like us to remove tactical nukes from Europe.
They would like us to let the military deteriorate.
They would like us to NOT develop our energy resources. A drop in oil price would have a massive impact on Russia economically.
They would not want us to build up our military intelligence.
They would not want us to develop our military technology.
They would not want us to be secure from terrorist attacks.
On each and every one of these issues, the candidate the Russians would NOT want to get elected would be Donald Trump.
I think most people who believe this story was falsified by a politicized intel community instinctively know this, but I think it is worthwhile to state it unequivocally.
Also, who do you think Russia thought would GET elected?
Almost all news including Fox thought Hillary had an 85% or higher chance. Putin doesn't have his own people taking polls so he relies on ours.
Wouldn't it make more sense to get the goods on her and wait until she is elected before rocking the boat?
Owning DJT? No so much!
Of *course* Vlad wanted ILLary to win.That's why Obola didn't utter a word when he learned of their "interference".
Hillary has already sold out the USA to russia and would again in the future. Putin knows this, why would they help Trump?
Why would Russia oppose the election of a candidate who was compromised up over her freakin EYELIDS..?
“We’re pretty sure, Hillary, that you should abolish say...90% of your arsenal. My videotape of you with Huma also thinks so.”
“How soon do you need that..?”
Maybe I’ve missed some reporting of this possibility...
You seen this ANYWHERE on the news?
No, I have not seen it in the news at all. I just thought it myself all along.
Maybe Vald was tired of pulling up in a 20 big black SUV motorcade and wanted to go back to driving himself in a Lada. Because that is what cheap oil as a result of Trump’s energy policies are going to do for him.
Any enemy of the United States would have wanted Traitorhillary to have been elected, especially those enemies of the United States to whom Traitorhillary has given aid and comfort.
Of course Putin wanted Hillary to win...she was selling him uranium for starters, and Putin could threaten to disclose stuff if she didn’t dance to his tune coz’ I’m sure he had her emails, too. Prez. Trump is a different kettle of fish.
Sara Carter has been on Hannity extensively the last several months and works for Circa News.
I’ve said this many times. Russia already had an in with Hillary and her husband Bill. So why would they endanger that to get Trump elected. There is no reason, and Russia was not behind Trump at all.
Pretty much a duh no-brainer. I assume Putin doesn’t like Hillary, but a Hillary Presidency would have served his and Russia’s personal interest, if nothing else the energy/oil issue and the further gutting of our defense issue. Also, as many have said, we assume Putin has those 30,000 emails that are rife with blackmail possibilities - one of the main reason I said way back that Hillary just cannot be President on the blackmailability issue alone.
What, besides common sense?
COMMUNIST sense, that’s what!
That title has already been proven, yet Rosenstein, Mueller, and huge donators to Hillary are trying to find Trump-Putin Connection.
Do you have a link I can cite?
Rosenstein seems to be a worthless beltway careerist looking out for his own resume. Had he shut this down Mueller’s witch hunt would have never got started.
Trump used the Birth Certificate to shut down a controversy that was damaging to conservatives. He “accepted” the posted B.C. that he knew was a forgery to shut it down because he knew that the truth could never get established generally due to the impenetrable secrecy involved.
As have I and at least several others. Yours lays it out in the best and most succinct format. I am saving it.
Russia certainly invested a lot of money in the Clinton project.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.