[\/\/ayne]

Expecting a liberal Supreme Court Justice to do the right thing?

[wastoute]

Certainly there should be some consistency. If the courts can rule his EO unconstitutional “because of his remarks” then she needs to step out.

[miss marmelstein]

She won’t. Sessions has already done the stupidest thing imaginable.

[ThePatriotsFlag]

Ginsburg = Do the right thing .... Not!

Ginsburg = Do the left thing ...Pribably.

[Steely Tom]

All that recusal stuff is just politics, like everything else. Republicans get shamed into “doing the right thing,” and the Left wins again.

Democrats sneer at the idea, flip us the bird, and the MSM loves it.

[wiseprince]

If Trump​ tweets this wouldn't that automatically mean half the country will perceive a bias? He won't tweet about it and she won't recuse

[arthurus]

There is no enforceable requirement for her to recuse and she won’t. The Bench is a power position to be used for the advancement of her ideology. Recusal is being a traitor to her ideology.

[John O]

Pray for her, and for the rest of the liberals on the court. Psalm 109:8

[thoughtomator]

Ginsburg should have been compelled to resign in disgrace the day after she wore her “dissent collar” to protest the election outcome.

[dirtboy]

She will rule with the lower court, deliberately oblivious to her own double standards in the matter.

[Lazamataz]

“...no, Mr. Bond, I expect you to die.”

[upchuck]

“Now it is time for us to move to New Zealand” if Trump won, to the New York Times

A question for y'all: has there ever been a liberal who swore to leave the USA if so-and-so happens and then left when so-and-so happened?