WSJ is not allowing me to read more of the article. Is the conclusion anything like the title of the piece?
That is exactly correct......the world was not designed for multiculturalism mumble jumbo.....God is a God of distinctions for a reasons that are good for mankind...and so are we.........man without God is trying to dismantle and destroy them at every level.
This is all well and good. The moslems need to convert or kill the entire planet for their savior to return. Islam means submit. Moslems mean, submit or die. War has begun, we engage and defeat, or children, grandchildren or great grandchildren are tortured, raped and murdered by the hordes. I say, kill ‘em now, kill ‘em all.
How so, like this?: “Nation states formed an alliance and destroy every Muslim mosque, university, and philanthropy. There was resistance but the troublemakers we fed to the pigs.”
Bookmark
A constitutional amendment is needed. The constitution should never be construed to give protection to sharia.
Mass murder is an awful concept but so is worldwide slavery. A collision between Western values and Islamic beliefs is not just inevitable but is long underway.
Islam is guided by a holy book that calls for the murder of those who do not believe. This is why bombs are exploding. Most Muslims treat Islam as a normal religion and worship without controversy but some few go too far.
Altering the book could solve the problem but Muslims won’t hear of it. Their position is that the Qur’an is divinely written and completely infallible, so not one word may be changed. That’s a big problem. There can be no Reformation, no “redemption” of Islam, without deleting the calls to murder.
Muslim fanatics treat murder like a duty, divinely given. We treat it as a crime. At what point does patience run out and the victim goes on offense? And what would such an offense look like except mass murder?
Most of the article is good, but this is nonsense.
We should treat everyone the same, regardless of their religion, or lack of religion.