Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Stentor

Because he didn’t use chemical WEAPONS this is so stupid thier attacking Spicer

A bullet or an explosive is legitimate combat weapon.. chemical weapons are prohibited. And that retaliatory attack on a Assad was over using chemical weapons not Conventional Weapons

If you want to equate chemical weapons vs Conventional Weapons to the Holocaust.

Are people really trying to say that if the NAZI had just machine gunned ( a conventional weapon) the people in the fake showers instead of using gas in the fake showers then the extermination of the six million people would of some how been better??!!!!???

This is most asinine thing I’ve ever seen

Equating the Holocaust to the ban use of chemical weapons in combat is putting Hitler (who was gassed in WWI) on some kind of morally Higher Ground because he would then be a victim of gas first by the allied powers in WW1


12 posted on 04/12/2017 3:26:25 PM PDT by tophat9000 (Tophat9000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tophat9000

Actually, both sides used incendiary bombs during WWII which could have technically been classified as “chemical weapons”.


15 posted on 04/12/2017 3:29:25 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson